Theme: Responsibility

  • NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE —“It’s not an accident that Jews i

    NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE

    —“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer

    You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure).

    The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females.

    This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload.

    We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful.

    As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains.

    The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do.

    As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.

    (Original Post)
    gab.com/curtd/posts/105616705074710248


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 13:59:09 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105616713213825777

  • NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE —“It’s not an accident that Jews i

    NO THE JEWS ALWAYS HAD CHOICES – THEY CHOSE

    —“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer

    You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure).

    The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females.

    This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload.

    We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful.

    As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains.

    The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do.

    As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 13:57:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105616705074710248

  • The problem is sorting high function vs low function. High function are responsi

    The problem is sorting high function vs low function. High function are responsible for disproportionate intellectual competitive innovation. In effect high functioning is the next step in evolution. Low function a disaster. Same for psychosis and any frontal development failure.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-25 03:21:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353543555244023809

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353540835992723456

  • We think in terms of control, but they think in terms of undermining. It’s hard

    We think in terms of control, but they think in terms of undermining. It’s hard for us to step into their shoes because fundamentally they avoid all responsibility and accountability and always preserve plausible deniability. So it’s less about power and more about tearing down.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 20:47:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353081953252216837

    Reply addressees: @TruthQuest11

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353081244347736065

  • Sanctions will hurt whites not blacks. The only thing we can do is use the russi

    Sanctions will hurt whites not blacks. The only thing we can do is use the russian method of ‘responsibilty for our kin’, and say that if they can’t protect european south africans then it is a failed government and we will have to take on the job


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-23 00:32:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352776131104141312

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352757414399856641

  • It’s possible to fix demographics. Not reproduction w/o (a) ending community pro

    It’s possible to fix demographics. Not reproduction w/o (a) ending community property, limiting marriage to power of attorney (b) restoring fault in divorce (c) restoring liability for interference in marriage (d) ending child support, alimony, welfare (e) eugenic sterilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-21 18:44:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352326142145998850

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1352324807031836673

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Notes on a speech by Yual Harari

    “We limit ourselves to Property(Permission) and Range(Duty,Responsibility)” “Fictions or Narratives create a paradigm (system of measurement) of property(permission) and range(duty), creating a system of cooperative rules” “Human rights are a fiction” … that’s not really true. Those Human rights that are Natural Rights are an extension of life and phenotype. They are in fact a universal paradigm and measure. We can separate out natural rights (true) from fantasies (false). “everybody believes in money” not really true. everyoe believes in acquisition and money is the most frictionless resource for use in acqusition. “Money has no objective value”. That’s not really true. Money has no resource (commodity) value that can be directly consumed without exchange for a resoucre(commodity) that can be consumed or transformed. What does Liberalism mean: “Individualsm”… No. its self determination. the philosophy and strategy of aristoracy, and the west promised everyone the opporutnity to join it – because the west has been eugenic for its entire history. So no, it’s not individualistic. It’s rapid evolution by rapid meritocratic adaptation – and equal suppression of reproduction. It’s not liberty (permission) but self determination (reciprocity0. We believed our own promise of an aristocracy of everyone was made possible by the industrial ervolution. It wasn’t. We opened the franchise without completing the project of an aristocracy of everyone. No he doesn’t understand liberal politics. Instead if forces continuous empirical adaptation for forcing thepeople to make choices, and gain the benefits or consequences. OMG this guy is a liar or an idiot. No the highest authority is’t the customer, it’s that making erros forces changethroughut the polity. It’s continuing natural selection.  Note how he keeps making use of the word authority – showing he does not understand it. OMG he talks about duchamp. But duchamp was forcing the jewish marxist revolt against western aesthetic. that’s not liberlism. That’s jewish marxists attack on western aesthetics. Ethics: the priest determines ethics – as an authority. No that individualism judgement of aesthetics was jewish marxist introduction, not a ueropean one. “Edcaton”… the student is the highest authority. No. we are forcng them to  adapt to the laws of the universe. “Human rights a religion” No. human rights were invented to constrain postwar states to self improvement in order to prevent another world war. “China has little to offer the world” – no only jews try to offer the world with idoelogy and religion. The europeans try to EVOLVE the world materially. There are only two elites and jews are only elites because of european tolerance. “Islam has no alternative to liberalism.” No. There is no evidence that islam cannot go through a protestant reformation as they develop a middle class. I could do it. THey can do it. they have to have the NEED to do it.  

  • Why do you frame these questions as someone else’s responsibility not yours? Chr

    Why do you frame these questions as someone else’s responsibility not yours? Christianity? Democracy? What causes you to think the responsibility isn’t yours?

    Solve that problem and we solve the bigger one. 😉


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-14 19:19:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349798350330212354

    Reply addressees: @JarvisWitts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349797272352026625

  • You’re absolutely going to turn ‘never again’ into ‘again for certain’. Demonstr

    You’re absolutely going to turn ‘never again’ into ‘again for certain’.

    Demonstrate reciprocity between your people’s agents in Leftism, 70’s bombings, BLM, Antifa, ADL/SPLC, and the Soros collective, vs the Right’s patriots.

    I’ve been trying to stop it.
    You pour gas on it.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-13 18:09:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349418313374457860

    Reply addressees: @ezraklein

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1349414272787365893