Theme: Responsibility

  • I can in fact warranty my claims. I can warranty them with my life, property, or

    I can in fact warranty my claims. I can warranty them with my life, property, or money. I can testify that the supernatural is falsified already.That you don’t know this is a matter of knowledge not opinion. And you have means, motive, and opportunity to lie despite ALL evidence.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-07 15:24:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358436384239927297

    Reply addressees: @FL1420

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358434026168664065

  • Then its rather pointless. A pointless moral effort without consequences is one

    Then its rather pointless. A pointless moral effort without consequences is one thing. A pointless moral effort with consequences is another. And it’s pretty clear from the past few days that someone is trying to make a career win by fabricating some case against me.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 19:34:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358136991368495105

    Reply addressees: @_Akhaten

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358136218605785089

  • They are consistent in the false promises of freedom from formal, physical, beha

    They are consistent in the false promises of freedom from formal, physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe. And consistent in throwing the problem of their non-compliance over the wall to men.

    And it’s pure instinct. They have no idea they’re just animals.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 18:20:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358118346248638472

    Reply addressees: @Imperius__13 @ThruTheHayes @Airmanareiks

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1358117956245475335

  • @tisawarem No. I just believe it is a moral obligation for those of us with abil

    @tisawarem No. I just believe it is a moral obligation for those of us with ability to try to drag the horse to water frequently enough there is a chance it might drink and save itself from dehydration – even if we fail.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-06 04:28:43 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105682417929842881

  • WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA FOR A KIND AND MORALLY DECENT PERSON? —“If people think

    WHAT ARE THE CRITERIA FOR A KIND AND MORALLY DECENT PERSON?

    —“If people think you are a kind and morally decent person, then they are much more likely to find your arguments compelling. That’s why the fight against illiberalism should be conducted with as spirit of fairness and cordiality. It’s the best weapon we have.”—Bo Winegard

    —“Can we start by defining what a ‘kind and morally decent person’ is? If it’s too complicated to explain then surely it’s too complicated to serve as a source for ‘compelling arguments’? Where do we acquire this (objective?) knowledge and who delivers the training? When a large portion of people equate “kind and morally decent person” to “someone who thinks exactly like I do,” it’s little wonder why they’ll find their arguments more compelling.
    @JohnFMiller86

    Easy. A Moral Person Demonstrates:
    1) sovereignty of every individual’s demonstrated interests
    2) reciprocity in display word and deed
    3) truth before face regardless of cost.
    4) seeking to understand not agree
    5) exhausts opportunity for recirpocal compromise
    6) exhausts defense of private and common
    7) exhausts opportunity for charity
    That’s the definition of ethics and morals.
    8) fitness, manners, grace, and taste
    That’s what result.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-02 22:13:34 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105663955868929038

  • Valor Virtue and Character don’t exist in young men who a) virtue signal w/o dem

    Valor Virtue and Character don’t exist in young men who a) virtue signal w/o demonstrating it b) signal pride without earning it c) want a jesus or a hitler to save them but won’t lift a finger d) cower at the state e) don’t show when asked f) when they do show are ass clowns.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-02-01 23:00:21 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356376873207558144

    Reply addressees: @QuintusCurtius

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1356374760960225280

  • No the Jews Always Had Choices – They Chose

    —“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer

    You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure). The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females. This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload. We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful. As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains. The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do. As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.

  • No the Jews Always Had Choices – They Chose

    —“It’s not an accident that Jews in Europe excelled at financial endeavors and professions: it was all they were allowed to do, so characterizing it as “parasitism” is unfair. Every human economic activity can be characterized as “parasitic.”— @KCDefenseLawyer

    You haven’t stated why it’s all they were allowed to do (record of conspiracy against the population), or why they were able to do it (non-payment for ore responsibility for defense, institutions, commons, territory), or why they were allowed to do it (the nobility lacked bankers until the Templars), or what the rate of interest was (300%+), or why they charged that rate of interest (baiting into seizure), or what they did if it couldn’t be paid (seizure). The Jewish group evolutionary strategy is ‘avoiding the cost of territory, commons, rule, and defense, by creating a state within a state, by undermining by baiting into hazard while escaping warranty and liability and maintaining plausible deniability’. This is the group strategy of human females. This is why I am concerned that reforming our laws to prevent this method of fraud made possible by our first right of self-determination isn’t enough – because it’s a genetic strategy and they manifest feminine cognition, verbal ability, speech, method of argument, workload. We don’t think of it this way but females are more aggressive than males. Jews and Arabs are more aggressive than Europeans. This has something to do with sensitivity to status signals (lower neoteny) and is likely related to the Jewish and Arab and all south Eurasian tendency to lie by face before truth even when unnecessary and to treat deceit as cunning and prideful. As for claiming people are generally parasitic, that’s false. All cooperation under reciprocity is non-parasitic – and it’s disproportionately productive. There is no other action that is more beneficial than cooperation. Adaptive cooperation is the most beneficial which i why we can afford these expensive brains. The purpose of the common natural law is to incrementally suppress parasitism. There is a unique vulnerability in western civilization because we use adversarial meritocratic markets in every aspect of life, under the principle of self-determination by sovereignty. This means we do not defend the population against scams like other peoples do. As in all things the west is an engine of natural selection but only if it continues to suppress methods of irreciprocity no matter how complex.

  • So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and

    So in simple terms, you’re a social tax evader. Failing to pay the normative and behavioral tax of truth before face regardless of cost, that is necessary for the jury, for rule of law, for democracy,and for the high trust society that produces disproportionate economic velocity.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-30 15:38:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355540954904735750

    Reply addressees: @nicholaspiccari @drvolts

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1355539406241882113

  • That part of the conversation is either unstated or talking past me. The net is,

    That part of the conversation is either unstated or talking past me. The net is, as a judgment of law, the question is one of volition, not one of reciprocity or testimony.

    Not my job. Or the court’s. Politics is for you folks.
    You choose. You pay the price or reap the rewards.


    Source date (UTC): 2021-01-26 02:13:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353888755615215617

    Reply addressees: @torinmccabe @FedorLives @JFGariepy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1353881710761488384