Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Temples Functioned as Banks

    October 9th, 2018 9:45 AM [T]he only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person. Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece. We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.

    The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above. Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction. EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors. The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.

  • No, The Abrahamic Dark Ages Are Something We Survived.

    October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.

  • No, The Abrahamic Dark Ages Are Something We Survived.

    October 9th, 2018 7:47 PM NO, THE ABRAHAMIC DARK AGES ARE SOMETHING WE SURVIVED. [I] don’t make mistakes. It’s my job to not make the mistakes others have made, no matter how frequent. No, the abrahamic dark ages destroyed all the great civilizations of the ancient world. Yes, it was the combination of plague and raids that weakened the roman empire. Yes it was the byzantine conquest of the west, and violent imposition of christianity that prevented the west’s restoration. Yes, islam destroyed all the mediterranean trade routes which vastly reduced trade. But Islam could not cross the sahara well, could not displace hinduism in india, the chinese would have none of it as they still will not, and by the time the muslims made it into europe by the eastern route they had so exhausted the capital of all the great civilizations and reduced them to dysgenia and ignorance that they could not adapt to and compete with modernity. The abrahamic dark ages destroyed every one of the great civilizations – all of them. We were just lucky in europe to SURVIVE THEM thanks to the north’s revolt against the corruption and nepotism of the church, and a reserve of northern peoples late to forcible conversion. We are currently in the second abrahamic dark age, and the second counter-reveolution against western civilization: Rousseau > Kant > Marx/Freud/Boas/Cantor/Adorno > the french postmodernists and feminists. This abrahamic dark age is just using pseudoscience, pseudo-rationalism, and outright denialism to accomplish in the modern world (manufacturing of ignorance, spreading a cult of economic and political promise, forcing immigration and displacement) that were practiced in the ancient world using sophomoric supernaturalism. ( I answered colonialism in another post: www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10156694322992264 ) I don’t expect other peoples to thank us for dragging them kicking and screaming out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, starvation, hard labor, child mortality, early death, disease, and the vicissitudes of nature, but then I don’t expect them to lie to me and cast our forcible lifting of them from semi animal state in to modernity – whether I in the greco-roman world or this anglo-germanic one. We had, at least until Burke, hoped the rest of mankind was able to join the aristocracy but they have not. And the 20th century was an interesting but failed experiment. This is why authoritarian governments are returning now that the USA as the inheritor of the british empire can no longer pay them for their conformity to the anglo empire. We return to nation states, nationalism, national socialism, and managerial government. The rest of the people of the world are insufficiently developed to operate by rule of law of reciprocity (natural law). They need their falsehoods. Just as you need yours. Cheers.

  • UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY As far as I know the Shroud of Turi

    UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY

    As far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 14:08:00 UTC

  • DEATHS FROM PLAGUE VS WARFARE VS RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY Plague is a disease (Bubon

    DEATHS FROM PLAGUE VS WARFARE VS RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY

    Plague is a disease (Bubonic Plague) spread by the bacteria Yersinia Pestis originating it what appears Pakistan in less virulent form?, spreading to china, and as usual, becoming virulent in china, and from china via overland and ships to persia, mesopotamia, the Levant, to the black sea, to the bosphorus to europe. The Plague is responsible for almost as many deaths (100-200M). With the Spanish Flu (50M), Small Pox (500M), Tuberculosis (Billions?), Malaria (Many Billions – mostly urban) providing comparisons. Plague deaths at 100-200m, were almost as deadly as deaths caused by islamic fundamentalism(750M) and jewish communism (100M), and european decimation of the native american population (unknown, but conservatively 50M).

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 13:27:00 UTC

  • NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHI

    NO THE BYZANTINES WEREN’T ROMAN AND THE EASTERN ROMAN EMPIRE HAD LITTLE IF NOTHING TO DO WITH ROME OR EUROPE.

    CHRISTIANITY IS JEWISH, SYRIAN, AND GRECO-ANATOLIAN

    Ethnically, culturally, organizationally, they were Anatolians and the greek aristocracy (european conquerors) of the athenians and spartans lost. We treat old europe (southeast europe) as european (atlantic+scandinavian + germanic+ celtic+ italic ) but this is just a convention. The balkans were old europe (anatolians), and remain anatolians (I haplogroup), and were not european, or roman, merely a ROMAN CONQUEST of the western Greek Empire.

    The holy roman empire was neither holy nor roman. The byzantine empire was neither european or roman, but anatolian/syrian. The balkans and greece today are still Anatolian and Muslim, and poor, and low trust, and corrupt.

    The boot of italy is still ethnically anatolian (greek), and that is why italy consists of two countries: germanic north and greek south. There are no Itals any more than there are Etrus, or Hellenes.

    There never were romans in Constantinople. There were merely greeks, balkans, anatolians, and syrians that held onto the roman name the way the germans held onto the roman name, and the church held onto the roman name: for status.

    Roman Empire was, as all european peoples, a religion of the Hearth and Land (“Heathen”). The jews, syrians, and greco-anatolians manufactured this false religion, and imposed it upon the european peoples in order to destroy the aristocratic recovery of rome after the invasion and the plague – a plague given to the west via byzantium.

    1 – INDO EUROPEAN EXPANSION BEGINS THE GREAT SHIFT

    2 – MESOPOTAMIAN EMPIRES EVOLVE SUMER->ACADIAN->ASSYRIAN (AND LATER ->BABYLONIAN) which appear to have been a locally originating subrace, and Sumerian neither semitic nor indo-european.)

    2 – HITTITES(EUROPEANS) AND EGYPTIANS EXHAUST EACH OTHER FIGHTING OVER THE TRADE ROUTES.

    3 – ASSYRIANS(MESOPOTAMIANS) CONQUER HITTITES (AND LEVANT/ANATOLIA)

    4 – THE SEA PEOPLES (EUROPEANS) RAID AND DEFEAT ALL OLD WORLD CIVS EXCEPT EGYPT BY COLLAPSING WORLD TRADE (but egypt never recovers).

    5 – ELAM(West Asians)->PERSIANS(EASTERN INDO EUROPEANS) ESTABLISH THE ACHAEMENID EMPIRE AND THREATEN GREECE

    6 – GREEKS CONQUER ANATOLIA TO PERSIA TO EGYPT. (Macedon) (“Greece” is not the peninsula alone but the peninsula and the lands around the aegean, including the peloponnese, islands, and western anatolian coast.

    7 – ROMANS CONQUER GREEKS. (Rome)

    8 – GREEKS RE-CONQUER ROMANS (Bosphorus-Constantinople) by imposing middle eastern cults and religio-administrative rule in the Persian and Egyptian model.

    9 – SELJUKS CONQUER ARABS, THEN EVENTUALLY GREEKS (Bosphorus -> Balkans and enter old europe)

    10 – GERMANICS (Europeans) CONQUER SELJUKS, ARABS – THE NEW WORLD, AND ASIA

    11 – JEWS AND MUSLIMS STAGE THE SECOND RECONQUEST OF EUROPA: MARXISM-SOCIALISM-POSTMODERNISM-FEMINISM AS AN INTELLECTUAL VANGUARD, WITH MUSLIMS PRACTICING RAIDING, TERRORISM, AND IMMIGRATION TO THE POINT OF FAILURE.

    THAT’S HISTORY. THATS HISTORY IN A NUTSHELL.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 12:17:00 UTC

  • The only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b)

    The only historic facts we know are that (a) someone seems to have existed, (b) the fact that temples functioned as banks necessary for trade, and the uprising at the temple, (c)the prosecution and crucifixion of this person.

    Every other aspect appears to have been produced by the fictionalization and incorporation of other myths, that like all of judaism, began either in mesopotamia, persia, egypt, or greece.

    We can document and have the evolution of each of the myths, from the first evidence in anatolia, to the spread throughout the fertile crescent.

    —

    The fact that most muslim scholars support the story of mohammed against all historical evidence. The fact that most christian scholars support the story of jesus against the historical evidence. And the fact that most jewish scholars support the existence of each of the characters and events, despite the evidence, tells us nothing. Truth is not determined by democracy, or by opinion, nor by historical authorship, but by evidence that survives falsification of all of the above.

    Someone named jesus seems to have lived. However, the only evidence we have that does not have origin in other myths and religions, is (a) uprising at the temple, (b) prosecution, (c) crucifiction.

    EVERYTHING ELSE was intentionally imported from prior religions synthesizing Seneca the Younger’s Stoicism, Greek Neo Platonism (idealism)/Authoritarianism, and Jewish pro roman reformation authors.

    The origin of the ‘risen after three days’ is most interesting because it actually refers to the morning star which, in the jewish tradition, was not just Horace but Lucifer.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 09:45:00 UTC

  • 4) Because Rents on the productive obtained by sophistry and false promises of r

    4) Because Rents on the productive obtained by sophistry and false promises of reward in the afterlife or post-revolution provide cheaper returns than facing the reality of one’s low sexual, social, economic, intellectual, political, and military market value.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-09 03:47:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1049506647213821953

    Reply addressees: @NoahRevoy @jordanbpeterson

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657

    IN REPLY TO:

    @NoahRevoy

    Many on the left think that @jordanbpeterson has become too divisive to continue as a university professor. At this point no outcome is acceptable therefore I publically call on Peterson to step aside so that a less divisive person can be appointed to teach his courses.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1048916888997318657

  • Um. Shroud of Turin Is a Nice Forgery. Sorry

    October 9th, 2018 2:08 PM UM. SHROUD OF TURIN IS A NICE FORGERY. SORRY [A]s far as I know the Shroud of Turin was produced for profit (a forgery) after the Fourth Crusade, as was common for all religious artifacts of the era. (Every little church wanted one as it provided an excuse for pilgrimage (vacationers). It is produced on fabric from the crusade period. The pattern of the weave was not produced in the origin period (not even sure it COULD be produced), which usually consisted of simple two-way weave. It appears likely that the cloth was of medieval Indian origins. The blood artifacts on the shroud are neatly applied not fitting splatter or settlement patterns. The posture appears to have been of a sculpted figure, not natural. The sculpture itself is medieval in technique (a knight) not ancient (a soldier or nobility). The coloring itself and its iron oxide can be produced relatively easily by wetting with organic compounds and laying on a relief sculpture and placing it in the sunshine to dry (uv radiation), thereby oxidizing (‘rusting’) the organic compounds. In other words all that was necessary was to find a relief sculpture common on a crusader burial of the period, to wet it with any number of organic materials (speculation on which was used isn’t clear), rub those organic compounds while on the sculpture, and to dry it in the intense regional sunshine. The problem we face is that so many people have come in contact with it, that other than the oxidation (Stains), we can’t trust any of the micro particles we’ve pulled from it since they contain everything from europe to the levant. In any event, as someone with a lot of experience with dead bodies, who has done rubbings of ancient 3d arts from all over the world, it looks like an obvious forgery, and it’s pretty hard for me to imagine anyone would think otherwise. But then I have an education in ancient art history, in identifying are methods, and as a consequence, art fraud, and my family is in the ‘burial’ business so maybe I’m just more informed by accident of circumstance.

  • Plague and Disease vs Religion

    October 9th, 2018 1:27 PM DEATHS FROM PLAGUE VS WARFARE VS RELIGION VS IDEOLOGY [P]lague is a disease (Bubonic Plague) spread by the bacteria Yersinia Pestis originating it what appears Pakistan in less virulent form?, spreading to china, and as usual, becoming virulent in china, and from china via overland and ships to persia, mesopotamia, the Levant, to the black sea, to the bosphorus to europe. The Plague is responsible for almost as many deaths (100-200M). With the Spanish Flu (50M), Small Pox (500M), Tuberculosis (Billions?), Malaria (Many Billions – mostly urban) providing comparisons. Plague deaths at 100-200m, were almost as deadly as deaths caused by islamic fundamentalism(750M) and jewish communism (100M), and european decimation of the native american population (unknown, but conservatively 50M).