(Customs: Westerners treat dogs as members of our family. Muslims hate them, and Asians eat them. We do not seem to take into account the difference in cleanliness and disease between cold-sparsely populated, temperate-loosely-populated, and hot-densely populated climates.)
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 17:22:00 UTC
DEFINITIONS: “INVETERATE” (ABRAHAMIST)
in·vet·er·ate
[inˈvedərət]
ADJECTIVE
having a particular habit, activity, or interest that is long-established and unlikely to change.
–“he was an inveterate abrahamist, practicing pilpul, critique, shaming, rallying gossip and reputation destruction instead of truthful, dutiful, reciprocal, argument.”–
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-11 06:55:00 UTC
October 10th, 2018 9:02 AM
Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
October 10th, 2018 9:50 AM
—“Could we come up with a better term than ‘tribalism’ please?”— Marginal Revolution
OMG….. How about we use operational (scientific language) instead of postmodern (pseudoscientific language)? I mean, is economics a science or a pseudoscience? The world doesn’t need more sophisms. |PACK| Family > Kin > Clan > Tribe > Nation > Civilization > Race = Markets for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law, trade policy ameliorating differences in purchasing power), producing universal EUGENIC reproduction. –versus– |HERD| Individual > Corporation > Universalism = NO MARKETS for signals, values, frames, norms, traditions, Laws, Institutions, and group evolutionary strategies REGULATED by the natural law of reciprocity (international law), instead involuntary transfers between groups producing UNIVERSAL DYSGENIC REPRODUCTION. Economics if anything consists of the full accounting of costs. NOT THE CHERRY PICKING OF RETURNS INDEPENDENT OF COSTS. I don’t make mistakes such as these. The reason is that I don’t engage in cherry-picking (Pseudoscience) Justificationism (sophism) and Postmodern (denial and deceit) “empty verbalism” for the purpose of producing frames that perpetuate the frauds of involuntary transfer, and the spread of dysgenia. Simple facts: those groups that practiced eugenic reproduction under manorialism (east and west) succeeded precisely because of those eugenics, and those that did not, and still do not, are those that struggle. And those that were sold the false promise of universalism whether in the ancient world (the Abrahamic Dark Age and the destruction of all great civilizations of the ancient world), and in the Modern world (marxist-libertarian-postmodern-feminist destruction of the modern world) but lacked the reserve capital (europe, east asia), were sufficiently distracted by the false promise of pseudoscientific sophism, that they have missed the window for using the industrial and technological revolution to organize their societies for eugenic middle class reproduction. Reductive Explanation: The HERD (Universalist) doesn’t know it’s a HERD, but the PACK (Nationalist) knows it’s a pack, and the herd a herd. Selective use of economics to justify an instinct is just pseudoscience. Either you engage in full accounting or you don’t.
October 10th, 2018 9:02 AM
Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly.
THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD.
October 10th, 2018 11:21 AM
—“None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions: …”Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly. THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD. -CD…”—
1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to. 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria. 3) We can train physical abilities, intuition-emotion, reason, and skills of transformation. We have developed ritual, religion, stoicism, and philosophy to train intuition & emotion and intuition, and developed calculation for reason, and techne for skills 4) Semitic argument consists of the sophisms of pilpul, critique, false promise, moral hazard, monopoly control of information, using threats of ostracization, disapproval, shaming, gossip, rallying and reputation destruction to impose a monopoly by suggestion and intimidation. 5) We call this combination of sophism (psuedo-rationalism), supernaturalism (occult), false history (pseudoscience) ritual indoctrination, false promise (fraud) to create a monopoly of conformity to falsehoods a “Religion” even though doing so is unique to the Semitic Religions. 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction. 7) So just as the Romans invented empirical law with the help of aristotle and zeno, the Greeks invented idealism and ideal argument, the semites invented the sophistries of pilpul and critique and threats of ostracization thus weaponizing the female group strategy in argument. 8) meanwhile the west produced hero-worship, civic ritual, the cult of the empirical law of tort, reason, rationalism, empiricism, science as an evolution of their criteria of decidability: individual sovereignty, with disputes resolved by law of tort, and a MARKET for ideas. 9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
October 10th, 2018 11:21 AM
—“None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions: …”Universalism. Universalism. Monopoly. Monopoly. Communist monopoly, libertarian monopoly, neocon monopoly = abrahamic monopoly. THE HERD DOES NOT UNDERSTAND IT IS A HERD. -CD…”—
1) I don’t make mistakes. It’s my job not to. 2) Each social order (Wisdom literature), whether legal(western), rational(chinese) theological(Semitic), or literary(Indian), relies on criteria of decidability and method of argument in support those criteria. 3) We can train physical abilities, intuition-emotion, reason, and skills of transformation. We have developed ritual, religion, stoicism, and philosophy to train intuition & emotion and intuition, and developed calculation for reason, and techne for skills 4) Semitic argument consists of the sophisms of pilpul, critique, false promise, moral hazard, monopoly control of information, using threats of ostracization, disapproval, shaming, gossip, rallying and reputation destruction to impose a monopoly by suggestion and intimidation. 5) We call this combination of sophism (psuedo-rationalism), supernaturalism (occult), false history (pseudoscience) ritual indoctrination, false promise (fraud) to create a monopoly of conformity to falsehoods a “Religion” even though doing so is unique to the Semitic Religions. 6) This form of argument like mathematics, logic, writing, language or any other technology, is traceable throughout history as the incremental evolution of a technique of deception. It is used to produce natural neurochemical (opiate) responses and functions as an addiction. 7) So just as the Romans invented empirical law with the help of aristotle and zeno, the Greeks invented idealism and ideal argument, the semites invented the sophistries of pilpul and critique and threats of ostracization thus weaponizing the female group strategy in argument. 8) meanwhile the west produced hero-worship, civic ritual, the cult of the empirical law of tort, reason, rationalism, empiricism, science as an evolution of their criteria of decidability: individual sovereignty, with disputes resolved by law of tort, and a MARKET for ideas. 9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine
DEFINITIONS: “INVETERATE” (ABRAHAMIST) in·vet·er·ate ADJECTIVE having a particular habit, activity, or interest that is long-established and unlikely to change.
–“he was an inveterate abrahamist, practicing pilpul, critique, shaming, rallying gossip and reputation destruction instead of truthful, dutiful, reciprocal, argument.”–
DEFINITIONS: “INVETERATE” (ABRAHAMIST) in·vet·er·ate ADJECTIVE having a particular habit, activity, or interest that is long-established and unlikely to change.
–“he was an inveterate abrahamist, practicing pilpul, critique, shaming, rallying gossip and reputation destruction instead of truthful, dutiful, reciprocal, argument.”–
9) It’s not that I don’t understand religion. It’s that I understand it completely; how to replace its falsehoods completely; and that abrahamic religions were responsible for the dark ages, and the destruction of all the great civilizations in the ancient world – and modern.
Source date (UTC): 2018-10-10 15:16:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050042383604289539
Reply addressees: @weltmord
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984
IN REPLY TO:
@weltmord
@curtdoolittle None of these three ideologies has anything to do with abrahamic religions.
THE DOOLITTLE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND HE IS WRITING HIMSELF INTO NOT EVEN A SHALLOW BUT UNSUBSTANTIAL CRITIQUE OF RELIGION
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1050034352137129984