Theme: Religion

  • GODS AS UNITS OF MEASURE —“Curt, when you say ‘A GOD is a unit of measure’, wh

    GODS AS UNITS OF MEASURE

    —“Curt, when you say ‘A GOD is a unit of measure’, what do you mean? This idea hit me strictly from the judeo christian “god made man in his image”. Like a blue print. But i have found that referring to god as a unit of measure only seems to offend christians jews and muslims. My point was never meant to insult. Yaweh , Allah, Odin, even Satan are units of measure. Where as men we are meant to measure ourselves against as to see how and where we need to grow to become better. …i had to quit talking about this at work.”—

    First, while most people consider the big ideas, very few people think very deep thoughts. And the vast majority who try (like anything else) fail catastrophically. I tend to avoid such conversations unless others start them and make some error that I feel they would benefit from, or the commons would benefit from, correcting.

    And then, it might be better to say that a god or gods function as a system of measurement, by which people of the same god, make the same measurements (judgments), because those measurements are commensurable (compatible).

    Different gods require different sets of measurements, producing different judgements, that are internally commensurable (compatible) but externally not. So in this sense it’s a system of measurement we are referring to.

    And that is because anthropomorphism is much easier for we simple human animals to work with that reason science, and calculation.

    There are some relatively universal traits among all gods, but there are many differences. Particularly when ‘gods’ are ‘spirits’ or ‘ancestors’ rather than fictional characters.

    Those gods we ‘thank’ and persist their investments in us (ancestors), those gods that are like fickle humans and fickle nature for us to thank for the good, and outwit for the bad (european), those gods that provide wisdom (buddha), those gods that are slave-owners (abrahamic), each function as a system of measurement by which we understand, judge, and act in response to the universe and gods and politics and each other.

    The western Method of math, logic, Science, Economics, Law, History and Literature is a better system of measure – for an aristocracy of the middle class and higher. It does however require a great deal more training for a great deal longer, than children’s stories and anthropomorphic systems of measurement.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-05 13:13:00 UTC

  • Right(M)=conservative=empirical (truth) Left(F)=consumptive=ideal (fraud We are

    Right(M)=conservative=empirical (truth)
    Left(F)=consumptive=ideal (fraud

    We are out of the period of family due to AMPF (Abrahamism, Marxism, Postmodernism, Feminism) and as such no longer ‘a people’ but Males and Females in Competition.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-04 14:56:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1069968643390431233

  • JUSTIFICATION FOR GROUPING —“The Abrahamic program’s second revision (Marx, Fr

    JUSTIFICATION FOR GROUPING

    —“The Abrahamic program’s second revision (Marx, Freud, Boaz, Cantor, Mises, Rothbard, Strauss) has been catastrophic. “—CD

    —“That’s a pretty unintuitive grouping, what’s the justification for it?”— Trent Fowler

    Method of argument. Just like we have math, logic, rationalism (formal, kantian), empirical, and scientific, we also have sophistry(pseudo-rationalism), pseudoscience, and mysticism. The abrahamic method turns out to be as perfect a method of lying as the scientific method is of telling the truth.

    So, the abrahamic method consists of (but is not limited to ) (a) false promise (b) baiting moral hazard (c) creating opportunity for parasitism or undermining, (d) using Pilpul (sophism, justificationism), Critique (straw manning criticism without supplying operationally possible alternatives,), Heaping undue praise, and reputation destruction, by means of loding, framing, suggestion, overloading, psychologizing, moralizing, half truths and outright deceits.

    Now, I’ve spent a lot of time on it, but you have to ask yourself, why, if mathematical, logical, empirical, operational, rational, reciprocal, arguments with tests of scope, completeness, and coherence exist, why it would be that you would argue by any other means.

    I suspect you’re referring to either mises or rothbard, and the work is here if you want to go through it (as well as hoppe).

    https://propertarianism.com/2018/10/28/propertarianism-for-for-libertarians/


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-03 15:42:00 UTC

  • AXIS: Prophet, Philosopher, Law Giver. Difference?

    AXIS: Prophet, Philosopher, Law Giver.

    Difference?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-01 19:33:26 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068951222454009858

  • AXIS: Prophet, Philosopher, Law Giver. Difference?

    AXIS: Prophet, Philosopher, Law Giver.

    Difference?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-12-01 14:33:00 UTC

  • In other words, without the COMPETITION between rational distance from your emot

    In other words, without the COMPETITION between rational distance from your emotions, and pursuit of achievements in life, all one does is recreate abrahamic and buddhist detachment from reality. This produces no excellences, only defenses – submission to circumstance.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 19:54:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231755142967296

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231754333470721


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    But what troubles me when I survey your (collective) approach, which is the imbalance between defensive self help and detachment – the trap fallen into by the Buddhists – and disciplined self-authoring in the excellences (‘virtues’), and in achieving one’s life’s goals (change).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231754333470721


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    But what troubles me when I survey your (collective) approach, which is the imbalance between defensive self help and detachment – the trap fallen into by the Buddhists – and disciplined self-authoring in the excellences (‘virtues’), and in achieving one’s life’s goals (change).

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231754333470721

  • But what troubles me when I survey your (collective) approach, which is the imba

    But what troubles me when I survey your (collective) approach, which is the imbalance between defensive self help and detachment – the trap fallen into by the Buddhists – and disciplined self-authoring in the excellences (‘virtues’), and in achieving one’s life’s goals (change).


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 19:54:31 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231754333470721

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068231753406517253


    IN REPLY TO:

    Unknown author

    Those polities are superior because they are less dependent upon falsehoods to govern. So the direction of the Stoic Restoration has more than trivial importance to me, and to them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231753406517253


    IN REPLY TO:

    @curtdoolittle

    Those polities are superior because they are less dependent upon falsehoods to govern. So the direction of the Stoic Restoration has more than trivial importance to me, and to them.

    Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1068231753406517253

  • Religion is just law … in fictional form

    Religion is just law … in fictional form.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 18:08:35 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1068205092535443456

  • TESTING THE THEORY FALSIFIES IT —“Jesus and his Philosophy are the Foundation

    TESTING THE THEORY FALSIFIES IT

    —“Jesus and his Philosophy are the Foundation of Western Civilization, not Christianity.”—Dan Cox

    They are the foundations of christianity and that is all. If that were not the case, other christian sects would produce the same categories of outputs and conditions that western peoples do.

    Christian communities tend to produce higher trust. That’s true. THat’s all. And for the reasons I’ve stated.


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 17:58:00 UTC

  • THE CHOICES OF SOCIAL ORDER GOVERNANCE …………..Force —– Religion ——

    THE CHOICES OF SOCIAL ORDER GOVERNANCE

    …………..Force —– Religion —— Trade (anglo)

    Control Violence and the Law (Law)

    Force……..X………………………………………..

    Force……..X……………….X…………………….

    Force……..X…………………………………..X…

    Force……..X……………….X………………..X…

    Control Education, Inclusion, Exclusion (Norms)

    Religion………………………X…………………….

    Religion…..X………………..X…………………….

    Religion………………………X……………….X….

    Religion…..X………………..X……………….X….

    Control Money and Credit ( Consumption )

    Trade……..X………………………………………..

    Trade……..X………………..X…………………….

    Trade……..X…………………………………..X….

    Trade……..X………………..X……………….X….

    We evolved Force (aristocracy) > Administrative | Administrative (Religion) > Trade (commercial) because it was necessary.

    We should note that the middle east did NOT follow the same route, and developed Religion > Force(kings) > Priest-Kings > Centralized government and production > Then Trade. Never rule of law.

    This is why the fertile crescent was both a benefit and a curse. Just as resource curses are always a double edged sword.

    Means of Decision on the Organization of Production and Choice of Commons:

    ………………Monarchy .. Oligarchy .. Rule of Law . Democracy

    Auth……..: ……X

    Rentiers…: ……………………..X

    Markets…:………………………………………..X

    Socialism.:…………………………………………………………….X

    See?


    Source date (UTC): 2018-11-29 17:43:00 UTC