Theme: Religion

  • THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Re

    THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE

    End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 10:07:00 UTC

  • If I was gonna have a cult, I’d do one that appealed to leftists, promised free

    If I was gonna have a cult, I’d do one that appealed to leftists, promised free stuff, indiscipline, free virtue signals, and threw parties – they get the easy chicks.

    (Oh…. wait. That’s burning man with political ambitions)


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 01:09:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099476345040629761

  • NICEA They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control

    NICEA

    They consolidated power in the most SEPARATIST religion they could control. They had ‘control’ over the jesus character, but not control over the god character. So they chose the most useful storyline: the one with no competitors, and such that they could ‘parasite’ upon existing ‘god’.

    ie: Jesus is a parasitic character on the narrative history of gods, taking his legitimacy from a god, but unbound by the previous (really horrible semitic) god.

    They couldn’t make him a god, but wanted him to have the power of a god. So they made a parasitic character dependent upon these gods.

    This provided the priests with the control they needed to displace not only the previous religions, but through mass militant adoption, the aristocratic peoples (military and law) with a priesthood.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 21:39:00 UTC

  • R.E. CHRISTIANITY SPECIFICALLY: by John Mark Christians need us. They cannot and

    R.E. CHRISTIANITY SPECIFICALLY:

    by John Mark

    Christians need us. They cannot and will not save themselves. (In the sense of producing sufficient resistance to the Left.) And they know the Left seeks to destroy them.

    This gives us leverage and the ability to garner their support: “We are the only ones who can save you. You will not have a “Christian-run nation” until Jesus comes back. You don’t have the power to make it happen. BUT together we can ensure you and our shared (family/conservative) values survive. On the other hand, if we don’t work together (if you don’t support our rule-of-law that punishes evil as the Bible commands), then Christianity as you practice it will be outlawed & you will lose everything you value. Work with us (support our solution), you survive, and our shared family/conservative values survive. Refuse to support us, and you lose everything.”

    We say this knowing that after the shakeout their religion will continue to die and will be the “crazy uncle” of the Right in the meantime. And the negative effects of their universalism will be nipped in the bud by Propertarian law.

    We can communicate this in a palatable manner: “We have many shared values. You can’t win on your own. Too many people will rebel against a “Christian nation”. However, a sufficient number of people will accept a “Propertarian nation” with no consumer interest, no corrupt politicians, no special interests controlling politics, rule of law enforcing reciprocity, many social policies determined more locally, etc.

    Your support is valuable to us in making this a reality and doing Romans 8 “punishing evil” better.

    Let’s do this.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 13:23:00 UTC

  • REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED. (core) Someone just sugges

    REPEATING – I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE – THE JQ ANSWERED.

    (core)

    Someone just suggested I reiterate. I don’t do hate on people, but on ideas.

    (Although I do a lot of anger and frustration, because I don’t suffer fools, sophists, supernaturalists, or the intellectually dishonest.)

    0. Propertarianism is a social science written in the grammars of law and economics. The product of that work is universal like all sciences. Any people can use it. It is easier for our people to use it because we have higher trust, lower corruption, and more experience under empirical truth and rule of law, because we have been a middle class or middle class organized polity for longer than all other peoples.

    1. I view the Ashkenazim as ‘ours’ – genetically they are half ours, and we’ve “bought and paid for their inclusion” in our polity so to speak over the centuries – at the costs of tens of millions of lives, vast abuse by extreme usury, undermining of every one of our nations, and cultures, and much of our great civil wars.

    2. But I view their problem as ours – our failure to adapt the law to prohibit parasitism upon the commons, false promise and baiting in to moral hazard, and the use of pilpul and critique, including the defense of all of the above by GSRRM.

    3. I view the problem of this kind behavior as relatively easily solved by law – law which I have produced, by accident really, as a byproduct of attempting to explain our own group strategy in scientific terms.

    4. I view the ending of the malincentives of the industries in which they employ false promise, baiting into hazard, pilpul, critique, and GSRRM resulting in continuous undermining of our civlization as relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    5. I view restoring our high trust society, the civil society, the family, and the market between men and women, definancializing our society, depoliticizing it, de-programming it, cleaning the academy, the media, the government, and business, finance, economics, and law, of this behavior relatively easy – using the law I have produced.

    I DON’T AVOID THE QUESTION – I SHOW YOU THE MIRROR

    So, I don’t avoid the JQ. I explain it. I answer it. I say how to productively solve it. And I do it without hating on anything except our traditional differences in group competition that like all differences must be ameliorated by incremental suppression of novel means of parasitism, by the incremental evolution of the common law of tort.

    IS THIS A CIVNAT POSITION?

    Well, I write LAW. Whatever government you want to produce, whether nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist, and no matter what economic model you may want to produce, you can do it with P-LAW as long as you do it truthfully and transparently, without fictionalisms, lying, and GSRRM. So it’s an ethno nationalist, civic nationalist, or globalist position.

    WHAT ABOUT ETHNOCENTRISM?

    My position is scientific: (a) ethnocentrism is always and everywhere the optimum group strategy, (b) it is the optimum international order always and everywhere (c) scale is only valuable for (i) suicide by debt expansion, (ii) use of suicide by debt expansion in the production of industrial (Gen 2 and Gen 3) warfare, in an age where hand to hand, and rifle, and mechanized infantry, have been replaced by supersonic autonomous nuclear weaponry – all but eliminating the utility of population and scale from the equation.

    WHAT’S MY PERSONAL OPINION?

    If you want my opinion (i) we are (at least our productive classes) incompatible with peoples who have practiced less self domestication (lower class size reduction, and neotonic evolution) without tragic cost to our future, to ourselves, and to our ancestors (ii) I ‘demand’ ethnocentric polity and (ii) no people or group of people have the right to deny it without conducting genocide, for which genocide is the only possible reciprocity. (iiii) I am willing to demand restitution for past and present lifetime crimes by those that attempt to make that decision for me and mine.

    PRODUCE INCENTIVES BY LAW – THE REST WILL FOLLOW.

    There are no other people other than east asians that are sufficiently compatible with us because they are the only other people more self-domesticated than we are. And there is no need for population, particularly underclass population, in an era where labor is no longer competitive in the international market therefore producing a deadweight cost burden on us for eternity.

    YOU DON”T NEED TO “BELIEVE” THE LAW

    People don’t have to believe in or agree with the Law. They just need to avoid it. They don’t need to be trained. Or educated. Incentives ripple through the economy and polity almost instantaneously. All that is required is incentive to report violations, and any violation of reciprocity that exposes anyone to risk provides incentive.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 11:18:00 UTC

  • “I want to ask a question … if you’d be so kind. Do you make the contention th

    —“I want to ask a question … if you’d be so kind. Do you make the contention that Christianity(Jesus) was a trick by the jews in order to shackle the goyim?”—Hugh McVey

    I make the contention that saul was trying to produce an heroic literature for the jews(christians) of his own sect, that could compete with Homer’s Iliad (the trials of achilles), which was the dominant ‘religious text’ of the greek world.

    I think that when the many ‘priests’ of the greek world were looking for a means of resisting greek (then roman) rule and thought, they found they could rally people with that text, and they all produced some version of it.

    I think once it became possible to use this movement as did marxists and postmodernists use the movement in the modern world – to obtain power – they did.

    I think that they did what they are doing today which is then destroying the academy, the arts, the letters, with this nonsense supernatural propaganda in the ancient world as with pseudoscience in the present.

    I mean, they TORTURED and MURDERED the greek philosophers in athens until all left. By 512 they’d outlawed teaching of philosophy, imprisoned, tortured, murdered, or banished every philosopher in athens.

    We are just in ‘christianity version two’ right now. and you’re trying to apologize for the first version – and the thousand year dark age we still have not shaken off our people.

    I think you’re ignorant and it’s not your fault. But once you are aware that you’re not only wrong, but harmful, it’s your responsibility to stop.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 10:44:00 UTC

  • NO MORE FAILURE REQUIRES NO MORE LIES It’s a truthful argument. The only valid c

    NO MORE FAILURE REQUIRES NO MORE LIES

    It’s a truthful argument. The only valid criticism of modern christianity is the statement that it is truth and history rather than wisdom and parable, and the lie is preserved by the abrahamic means of lying – that I illustrate daily.

    Christians have no choice. They’re headed to 25% evangelical in 75% atheist polity, where the polity will be conquered by jews and muslims like all in the past if we don’t stop it.

    If christians and conservatives and libertarians hadn’t failed for over a century then we wouldn’t be in our current position.

    No more failure requires NO MORE LIES.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 10:00:00 UTC

  • I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a yea

    —I mean. you don’t get it. The game is up. The goyim know. And it will take a year, but I will popularize this criticism of christians as the enemy of our people just as I have popularized other arguments. And all you can do is provide me with a continuous stream of evidence that I am correct. The ruth is the most devastating weapon. We must only pay the high cost of using it.—


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 09:18:00 UTC

  • AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT —“Propertarianism is a cult for people w

    AN EXAMPLE OF COMMON CHRISTIAN DECEIT

    —“Propertarianism is a cult for people who want to sound smart but aren’t.”—Kev Ahimsa

    —“Zero irritation, Jeremy. This is a lie. I ask simple questions.

    Then Curt gets angry and calls names and says (in many more words) “I don’t owe you a response, you’re not smart. My ego is bruised. Good luck in the civil war on your own, loser.”

    I’m open to seeing where I’ve been very irritated.

    If that happened, it’d have been a wrong response, and I’d own it. No reason to get upset over the internet.”— Noel Fritsch

    —“There are 2.2 billion Christians, do not alienate them Curt Doolittle, they could be useful allies”–…. This is almost verbatim from one of his posts. I’ve been following quietly for 2-3 years now, and do not chime in: “Hey Curt. I realize that the majority of American Jews are communists, but I would really like you to alter your philosophy to accommodate my needs. Just ignore the truth, ok? I am ostensibly looking for a better world for my family, but I would rather not upset the status quo, so just work that out for me. Stat. Just leave my religion alone.” What if there are in fact fundamental errors that need to be corrected?— Jeremy Bernstein

    (Thank you Jeremy Bernstein)

    Don’t be dishonest Noel.

    I get frustrated because you are trying to advance supernaturalism and the means of deceit it is communicated with, and I’m trying to end it – plus you engage in GSRM.

    So It doesn’t have anything to do with wit wisdom or quality of your questions, or depth of your criticism, or your character, it has to do with you’re WASTING my time. And you are wasting my time (just as you are now) because there is no ‘TRUTH’ argument for your cult – there is only ‘UTILITY’ argument.

    Well, there is utility argument for every excuse. Same argument EVERY cult, ideology, or philosophical disposition makes. It’s undecidable. Truth provides decidability. Utility only provides preference.

    Truth doesn’t unite into a monopoly (which is what you want – monopoly of lies) it unites on MARKETS under RULE OF LAW, where every little group gets whatever it wants in TRADE, without such horrors as Xian, Muslim, monopolies.

    So stop wasting my time. You and yours are the enemy of our people preventing the restoration of our people from the curse of supernaturalism and deceit.


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-23 08:47:00 UTC

  • so does that mean more than half of the people who identify as christian are not

    so does that mean more than half of the people who identify as christian are not – because they dont believe the nonsense but instead treat the mythology as wisdom lit?


    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-22 22:13:36 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099069723881410560

    Reply addressees: @MartianOrthodox @Friday13 @UnrankedChevron

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099069181763436546


    IN REPLY TO:

    @MartianOrthodox

    @curtdoolittle @Friday13 @UnrankedChevron The Nicene Creed must be espoused to be a Christian.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099069181763436546