Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Religion is just sh-tty law, worse litterature, and bad education. Heathenism is

    Religion is just sh-tty law, worse litterature, and bad education.

    Heathenism is just thanking one another, our ancestors, and nature for bringing us into being.

    Debts. It’s just debts.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 00:15:00 UTC

  • LACK OF CONVICTION AND SIGNIFICANCE There are strong christians and weak christi

    LACK OF CONVICTION AND SIGNIFICANCE

    There are strong christians and weak christians; good christians and bad christians; honest christians, and dishonest christians; committed christians and convenient christians.

    We represent: the truth, a constitutional reformation, and insurrection to demand it, is terrifying to bad christians.

    Why it confronts their insignificance and lack of conviction to do what is required to be significant.

    If you won’t fight you are insignificant. You have no conviction only cowardice.

    The truth is enough, but you can’t bear it. You can’t bear it because you can’t bear the shallowness of your conviction and the absence of your significance.

    The compromise is Truth in Faith and Truth in Law, or defeat of faith.

    The compromise is a christian nation or a christian minority.

    The compromise is a rule of law monarchy or no strongman.

    The compromise is a rule of law nationalism, or predatory socialism.

    The compromise is a rule of law market for classes, or pretense of democracy.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-26 00:11:00 UTC

  • Now, you just cherry picked a few thinkers each of whom was his generation’s fir

    Now, you just cherry picked a few thinkers each of whom was his generation’s first convert to aristotelianism. Spinoza was kicked out once he read european thought. Mendelssohn was trying to modernize in REACTION to western thought’s progress, and Von Neumann and Einstein were part of the first few generations of jews tolerated in europe – both having integrated into aristotelian thought and all but converted to christianity.

    The reintroduction of greek thought into europe was produced by a series of waves from the crusades, the transition of islam to ‘closure’, and the retaking of spain.

    Jews were the most literate people in europe for almost a thousand years and what did they accomplish other than setting the record for being purged for crimes against the people? Any literature? Any art? Any science? Any technology? Any medicine? Any legal system? Any Country? Any polity other than the pale for which they were justly punished by the locals?

    So you engaged in precisely the form of lying that christianity and judaism and islam teach, and which I expose and fight against.

    And so, why didn’t you mention Marx, Boaz, Freud, Lenin, Stalin, Adorno, Derrida, the ACLU, the Southern Poverty Law Center, The Hollywood Leftist machine, The NYT et al,, the finance industry and the pornography industry?

    Why didn’t you mention the 100M dead because of marx, the jewish bolsheviks, and the crisis of fascism in order to stop them? The pseudoscience of boaz and freud that destroyed our soft sciences. The utter fabrications of adorno and the frankfurt school? The warfare against our people by adorno and derrida, selling lies and destruction to the first mass generations of women in the academy?

    The total suppression of western thought from ww2 forward?

    NO MORE LIES. NO MORE PILPUL. NO MORE CRITIQUE.

    The enemy is among us and the Christian gives that system of lies constant nurturing and support.

    NO MORE LIES.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 23:10:00 UTC

  • CULT!!!!! “THE GIFT OF THE FROGS.” —“I found the secret of the natural law whi

    CULT!!!!! “THE GIFT OF THE FROGS.”

    —“I found the secret of the natural law while on a hike in the Carpathians in western Ukraine. They were impressed on some thick ceramic panels, written in early latin. And sealed inside a ceramic urn, inside a stone box, wrapped in reeds and leather. I had found this enormous rotting ancient tree stump covered with very loud little green frogs. And when I jokingly asked them why they were so loud, they startled and scampered, and in the dirt and leaves, under the heart of the tree, I saw the corner of the box.”–

    … lolz …

    (Updated)

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-25 15:16:00 UTC

  • THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Re

    THE RETURNS ON INTOLERANCE

    End Christian Tolerance as cheap Virtue Signaling. Restore The VIrtue of Intolerance – and the high cost of intolerance. The returns on tolerance are suicidal. The returns on intolerance eternal.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 15:07:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1099687211270897665

  • The Generations of European Thought: Gen1: Heathen (ancestral, seasons, nature)

    The Generations of European Thought:

    Gen1: Heathen

    (ancestral, seasons, nature)

    (ALL)

    Gen2: Aryan

    (exhaustive heroism and excellence)

    (UPPER)

    Gen3: Aristotelian

    (exhaustive naturalism, science, law)

    (MIDDLE)

    Gen4: Christian

    (exhaustive forgiveness and charity)

    (LOWER)

    I would be Aryan, Aristotelian, Heathen, Christian in my priorities.

    Kind of wonder what other priorities others feel.

    HEATHEN …………………….CHRISTIAN

    |………………………………………………….|

    |………………………………………………….|

    |………………………………………………….|

    |………………………………………………….|

    ARYAN…………………….ARISTOTELIAN

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 14:10:00 UTC

  • NAILING THE CHRISTIAN QUESTION —Curt Doolittle you nailed the Christian questi

    NAILING THE CHRISTIAN QUESTION

    —Curt Doolittle you nailed the Christian question for me. I try to imitate Christ as best I can, and believe it as “true”…in the sense of a way to live, an archetypal truth and not necessarily the literal kind. It doesn’t matter to me whether it all literally happened, I have no way of knowing that.”—Zach Matto

    Which is the optimum interpretation.

    It is hard to be a better ‘average person’ than by imitating ‘christ’. I suspect there is none better.

    You will be a better person doing so than any other character you might imitate. Because it is the optimum prisoner’s dilemma strategy for every single human as well as for any human group. That’s just science.

    But if it must be ‘true under law’ instead of an archetypal optimum (perfection really) then we cannot end the people who destroy our people.

    I sort of look at it this way: demandit it to be true is demanding others to do for you what you want.

    Demanding it to be the optimum means of conducting your own life is demanding you do for others.

    This is my understanding of Christianity:

    0) the life of piety: all life is sacred until proven otherwise.

    1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart.

    2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin.

    3) the demand for personal acts of charity and personal cost, 4) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    My ‘ask’ is to limit this charity to ingroups in order to prevent virtue signaling by failing to take care of those neighbors you look down upon.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 13:47:00 UTC

  • (from elsewhere) —…it is very hard for much of the world, and in particular

    (from elsewhere)

    —…it is very hard for much of the world, and in particular the muslim world, to grasp the function of ‘heroism’ and ‘truth before face’. It is contra-ethical to their intuition. It is however what makes us adapt and innovate thru continuous competition – and them not.—CD

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:55:00 UTC

  • AFAIK book Q is lost. This draft produced an oral tradition. The oral traditions

    AFAIK book Q is lost. This draft produced an oral tradition. The oral traditions spread and was modified and added to.

    The ability to rally the underclasses by it to violence against the romans and greeks spread revolutionary insurrection and resistance just like did Marxism in the present world using the same false promises.

    This new religion provided a revolutionary vehicle, and people piled onto it in revolt.

    Judaism > Revolt against the agrarian and metalsmithing peoples (fertile crescent empires).

    Christianity > Revolt against greeks and romans. By undermining the minority aristocracy of the west.

    Islam > revolt against ALL aristocratic civilizations – justifying destruction, conquest, and stealing everything not nailed down.

    Marxism > Libertarianism > Postmodernism > Feminism > Neoconservatism > Islamism : Revolt against ALL the great civilizations – in a desperate attempt to restore underclass rule.

    One continuous dysgenic, decivilizing, revolt against the indo europeans and their expansion, and their conversion from feminine underclass to masculine aristocratic rule.

    The war will continue until we name the war for what it is, and end it one way or another.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 12:26:00 UTC

  • CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion) Curt Doolittle: Well. I mean, you’re

    CULT (Religion) VERSUS CULT-LIKE (devotion)

    Curt Doolittle:

    Well. I mean, you’re saying I’m a cult leader and the work is religious. I am saying I would like to see if it is possible to produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law. To some degree the law already is a secular priesthood.

    So in essence I am agreeing with you – by analogy.

    Heather Joi:

    [GSRM DELETED]

    So what you’re saying is…..

    … that you acknowledge that you are: (in your own words)

    “searching for a religion of the law”

    “produce the equivalent of a cult – but of the law.”

    ”a secular priesthood.”

    Curt Doolittle:

    Well, I’ll just say that you forced me to look at the question from your perspective, and from your perspective, I agreed.

    What I’d assumed you’d meant was that the law was nonsense, and that I am positioning myself as some sort of leader rather than a teacher of leaders who will be the antithesis of the frankfurt school’s defeat of our people.

    (So if you call the frankfurt school a cult then we are talking the same language. if not then we are not.)

    But you are right, I am trying to to build a law, and if possible develop a secular occupation of ‘cult like devotion’, wherein the law is sacred (inviolable regardless of self interest.)

    I think I am pretty clear that I”m trying to separately find a way to convert our set of religions back to something european rather than semitic, and that’s the ‘cult’ (religion) I am looking to produce.

    So if you think I’m being dishonest, I’m just looking for the truth and your general argument helped me do so. And as I have defined it I don’t disagree.

    Cult (reform our religion) vs Cult-like (Sacredness of the law). ANd I agree with both. I just don’t CONFLATE THEM in order to lie.

    So in this sense yes I want to produce a cult (religion without priests) and cult like occupation (secular priesthood of the law).

    (And yes I do understand that you tried to engage in CONFLATION(AMBIGUATION) and that I (as usual) engaged in DEFLATION(DISAMBIGUATION).)

    In other words, you were lying. But within that lie was enough truth that I agree with the truth content.

    One is not guilty by word-association. Sorry.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-02-24 10:24:00 UTC