Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 11:20:00 UTC
Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 11:20:00 UTC
There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in indo european gods, heroes, myths and scientists.
But there is a vast difference between value and existence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 01:35:28 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109267383326261248
There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in indo european gods, heroes, myths and scientists.
But there is a vast difference between value and existence.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 21:35:00 UTC
I mean, if you have to choose to imitate abraham, mohammed, jesus, buddha, lao tzu, confucius, aristotle, jefferson, or aurelius the question’s aren’t very difficult. It’s when you don’t make that choice that you’re a danger to the rest of us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 13:58:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109091882808811521
ISLAM CANNOT REFORM AS DID CHRISTIANITY and JUDAISM
by JWarren Prescott
A very important distinction between Islam and judaism/christianity, is that j/c can reform themselves – Islam, by its very tenants cannot reform because it is the final, complete and perfect word of allah.
The western apologists for islam are just delusional to think that Islam can “come into its own like christianity did”.
Islam is permanently fixated in a time in human history where there wasn’t even a germ theory of disease.
It is a stagnant, iron age cesspool of the ravings of an epileptic warlord.
(CurtD: I Question whether judaism can reform, since its tenet is parasitic, just as islam’s tenet is predatory)
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 10:50:00 UTC
I mean, if you have to choose to imitate abraham, mohammed, jesus, buddha, lao tzu, confucius, aristotle, jefferson, or aurelius the question’s aren’t very difficult. It’s when you don’t make that choice that you’re a danger to the rest of us.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-22 09:57:00 UTC
CAESAR’S LAW
I do not speak for gods, whether your god, mine, or any others’. I speak for Caesar: the Law. I do not speak of faith but law.
–“Render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”–
One speaks to god of faith. One speaks to Caesar of truth. If one cannot distinguish between that which is faith and that which is truth, and that which is unto caesar and that which is unto god, then one must refrain from that which he cannot speak without breaking either caesar’s or gods laws.
The spirit may choose to serve on god, many gods, or no gods. But one’s words and deeds exist in caesar’s world not your gods, another’s’, or any.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 15:43:00 UTC
Again. I talk to my god every day. Often. But it is an old god. And sky father, and odin are closer to the face of god I know than jupiter, or zeus, and have nothing whatsoever to do with jehova. And these gods give only advice (wisdom). I am a deist in that it is necessary for human cooperation across our peoples to understand deism. I am christian in the sense that science tells me I and others must be to be wise and good. I am not christian in the sense that I submit to anyone, any thing or any falsehood whatsoever. In that sense I am pagan and aryan: a member of the cult of non-submission. I am an aristotelian(truth), a pagan (aryan), a heathen(nature), and a christian (the good). And I can be nothing else.
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 15:54:00 UTC
Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 19:57:00 UTC
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_SxeO6JU-xg/54520023_10157056588382264_8996646653238706176_o_10157056588377264.jpg Skye StewartRather than spiritually Woke, many of these people are intellectually BrokeMar 18, 2019, 11:07 AMBill JoslinThe superordinant in Which we are all beholden (i.e. god) always distills down to nature. In this context feminine predilections to faith, care, redistribution (hypergamy and a long list of other things) and masculine predilections toward competition, heirarchy, objects, (and a whole long list of other things) exists as “GODS WILL” i.e. intrinsic nature to men and womenMar 18, 2019, 11:10 AMGreg HamiltonIf figure if the gods are so awesome they can take care of their will themselves.Mar 18, 2019, 12:21 PMPatrick SmythThis is why it is almost always impossible to talk honestly and accurately about politics among women.Mar 18, 2019, 1:15 PMNick HeywoodBefore any f’n Nimrod can even claim to be enacting “God’s will”? They’ve gotta be prepared to know truth. Or at least know or discover as much truth as ya can get.
Ya don’t get that criticizing someone else’s attempt!Mar 18, 2019, 2:45 PMSteve PenderGod’s will = man’s will, she just doesn’t know it.Mar 18, 2019, 3:12 PMAmanda HarveyThe real meaning of ‘get woke go broke.’Mar 18, 2019, 4:02 PMAaron NeelyWhen the atheist has a more biblical view of gender roles than the Christian.Mar 18, 2019, 5:25 PMChris TangemannMen do the fighting. Women may or may not help.Mar 18, 2019, 11:02 PMChris TangemannNever in the history of mankind has an army of women defeated even a tribe of men.Mar 18, 2019, 11:03 PMChris TangemannFor the intellectual, to endure politically correct speech is merely to patiently suffer the etiquette of degenerates and fools.Mar 18, 2019, 11:12 PMCurt Doolittlequoted, shared.Mar 19, 2019, 10:13 AMEric McGowanImagine not seeing God in that thought process.. wait, never mind, she’s a woman and you addressed that in your original thought.Mar 19, 2019, 11:07 AMMonica MarquezI see God in a microscopeMar 19, 2019, 12:22 PM

Source date (UTC): 2019-03-18 11:02:00 UTC