Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553263056 Timestamp) I mean, if you have to choose to imitate abraham, mohammed, jesus, buddha, lao tzu, confucius, aristotle, jefferson, or aurelius the question’s aren’t very difficult. It’s when you don’t make that choice that you’re a danger to the rest of us.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553304905 Timestamp) There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in indo european gods, heroes, myths and scientists. But there is a vast difference between value and existence.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553266239 Timestamp) ISLAM CANNOT REFORM AS DID CHRISTIANITY and JUDAISM by JWarren Prescott A very important distinction between Islam and judaism/christianity, is that j/c can reform themselves – Islam, by its very tenants cannot reform because it is the final, complete and perfect word of allah. The western apologists for islam are just delusional to think that Islam can “come into its own like christianity did”. Islam is permanently fixated in a time in human history where there wasn’t even a germ theory of disease. It is a stagnant, iron age cesspool of the ravings of an epileptic warlord. (CurtD: I Question whether judaism can reform, since its tenet is parasitic, just as islam’s tenet is predatory)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553304905 Timestamp) There is value in semitic gods, prophets, and myths the way there is value in indo european gods, heroes, myths and scientists. But there is a vast difference between value and existence.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553354426 Timestamp) Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1553354426 Timestamp) Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.

  • (FB 1553711347 Timestamp) Heathen Humor

    (FB 1553711347 Timestamp) Heathen Humor….

  • Competitors vs Cooperators. Hence the number of ‘dead gods’ and ‘lost peoples’

    Competitors vs Cooperators. Hence the number of ‘dead gods’ and ‘lost peoples’.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-26 19:21:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1110622938204721153

    Reply addressees: @hbdchick

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1110343879054843905

    IN REPLY TO:

    @hbdchick

    why on earth adopt agriculture at all?: the neolithic egypt version of the question. from A History of Ancient Egypt: From the First Farmers to the Great Pyramid (https://t.co/UkmroyvcnX) (here on el omari: https://t.co/wmyi1PIObE) https://t.co/I3DsO04BmV

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1110343879054843905

  • David Carr —“Curt, I would like to draw your attention to a historical curiosi

    David Carr

    —“Curt, I would like to draw your attention to a historical curiosity. Some time between 600 and 800 AD all the nations that comprised Western Civilization at the time gave up their unique writing systems and accepted an “innovation” from Holy Rome that replaced the traditional legends of symbols with a phonetic reaction ethic. This appears to have given us an edge in the realm of creative daring, at the expense of societal cohesion and discipline as a social standard.”—

    Um. This is an false narrative. The Futhark was an invention in response to other writing systems, sometime after 300. We do not know where it originated. There are stories of migration of leaders from the caucuses. But trade was common and it come from general contact. It is most similar to Linear B, early Greek, and Etruscan – though simplified for carving. It’s less similar to Roman, Phoenician, or Cuneiform, which were for writing (roman, phoenician), or stamping in clay (cuneiform) more so than carving.

    Latin and Greek were the written language of literate peoples. And remained so until printing, with german literature dating back to the Carolingian period (700).

    The vocabulary and ideas in greek and latin, vocabulary and ideas in french, and vocabularies and ideas in german were as tehy are today, vocabulary and ideas of the classes.

    I disagree with your position. The reason they remain ‘cohesive’ is because they have not been invaded, and are too far behind the curve of adoption of modernity.

    —Societies that retain their legends of symbols (Hebrew, Arabic, every Asian language, etc) do not have our modern problems. They remain fairly cohesive, avoid suicidal ideologies, generally operate as societies.

    Might it be time to return to our roots, and establish a Legend of symbols within the Anglophone paradigm?”—

    you call chinese and arabic peoples cohesive? indian? No, they are just backward.

    We are in the lead, we experiment. we adapt, and sometimes we adapt poorly.

    This time, it’s because of semitic influence just like it was in the imperial period.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-25 15:57:00 UTC

  • Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement

    Under P-Law, “God Wills It” is an anthropomorphic but True statement.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-23 15:20:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1109475043975798784