What is the difference between Dayus Pitar, Thor->Odin, Zeus Pater, Jupiter, and Sol Invictus or even Zoroaster’s benevolent authoritarianism (indo europeans)? And the gods of semites (afro-asiatics) Egypt, babylonians, levantines?
I study and define the grammars. That means, the means of continuous recursive disambiguation, the logic, semantics, and permissible dimensions of speech acts in all their forms.
Just as serialization and disambiguation prohibit conflation and deceit by it, study of the grammars of civilizational argument prohibit conflation and deceit by false association, and inference therefrom.
These grammars are just as traceable as genetics, parables, myths, and legends. Because they are unconscious to all but those who study comparative civilization rather than drill down obsessively in ignorance upon their own.
Abraham was a semite. Jesus was a semite. Although increasingly likely a son of roman soldier and a jewish prostitute. Saul was a semite. The rabbis were semites. they wrote in semitic grammar (logic, dimensions, semantics), regardless of the language(Vocabulary) they wrote it in (hebrew, aramaic, greek, or latin). They did not write in CONTRACT LAW they wrote in divine authoritarian command. That is what distinguishes western philosophers and thinkers from semites, is the use of false proxies between low trust endemically lying people with false threats, rather than the common good in the contract law (reciprocity) between aristocracy (equals in responsibility for the commons).
Augustine and Aquinas did their best to combine both but they failed, leaving the west forever vulnerable to the semitic means of argumentation and lies, until we began our revolt against semitic lying with the empirical, literary, protestant, constitutionalist, and finally scientific revolutions.
I’m just continuing that tradition of eradicating semitic grammar and the endemic lying and vulnerability that results from continuous exposure to those lies in all their forms.
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
CHRISTIANITY WAS *NOT* A HELLENIC RELIGION The claim that it’s hellenic is not true. It’s one of *the big lies*. Hellenes under alexander (a Macedonian barbarian) Conquered the Anatolian > Semitic > Persian > west indian civilizations … for a time. They spread their technology in all its forms. That does not make Conquered people ‘greeks’ or ‘hellene’s any more than it makes Chinese Japanese and Koreans europeans for having adopted their technology under british-american imperial control of world patterns of law, finance, transport, and trade. Hellenes (Greeks) were CONQUERED by southeast european (illyrian), Anatolian, and Syrian members of the Bosporus state – which was neither roman (latin) or greek (hellene) but a combination then as today of ruled peoples, providing taxation to rome given the asymmetry of eastern vs western Mediterranean trade. These “Christians(jews)” killed the philosophers, closed the schools, forcibly converted the communes to nunneries and monasteries, destroyed the monuments statues, arts, and literature, and drove off, paid off, or killed off the aristocracy, and overturned or raided the trade routes (muslims) that destroyed western mediterranean trade while the west was attempting to survive the migration period brought about by Rome’s Celtic Holocaust, leaving a power vacuum in central europe that was easily filled by germanic-scandianvian migration. There is nothing Hellenic about the middle east or Egypt other than it was conquered and governed by greek aristocracy, who spread literacy the way jews, christians and muslims spread illiteracy and superstition and poverty. Claiming otherwise would be like saying that the present population of western european civ, that is governed by proxy by old families and jewish families, is in turn jewish. Because people write in greek or latin or any given language does not make them culturally or cognitively a member of the group who originated that language any more then that it does now. People the world over speak english but does that change their cognition, values, traditions, logic, rhetoric? Of all the thinkers plato is the only one who even approaches semitic supernaturalism with his idealism. Gods, demigods, ad heroes we trade with and are as frail as human families vs gods and demons we beg mercy from, are omnipotent, omniscient, and to whom we must submit. Epicurus vs Zeno, Aristotle and Socrates vs Plato, western geometry vs semitic algebra, greco roman history vs semitic mythology, greco-roman engineering vs semitic astrology, Archimedes vs (no one), greco-roman-germanic truth vs semitic face and endemic lying, greco roman Germanic trust vs semitic inability to produce trust. greco roman professional bureaucracy vs semitic inability to produce a professional bureaucracy. (continued…)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102424742095465130