SUPERNATURAL LIARS
(PART 2)
5. —“God … soul… exists”–
Gods(accountants) and souls (debt/credit accounts), are supernatural (false), fictional (false), euphemisms (analogies) we use for terms that correctly describe human intuitions of cooperation in the continuous competition between reciprocity (merit) and proportionality (necessary to maintain group cohesion), an a real, and natural world, where authorities (Rulers, Governors, Judges, Warriors, soldiers, Owners, Adult Men) are as selfish, predatory, parasitic, and dishonest, as the common people that they manage.
Gods are a system of measurement for cooperation within a group strategy within a series of polities sharing that strategy.
This system of measurement requires no ‘education’ (and is therefore a favor of the ignorant) other than intuition, since our intuition in relation to cooperation is merely a measurement of our success and failure at acquisition within the limits of our willingness not to defect or fight (proportionality).
So the reason for anthropocentric, anthropomorphic systems of measurement is that they can be taught to toddlers or people with even 60 or lower IQ (most of our history) without the need to engage in LOGIC and EVIDENCE in COMPETITION before PEERS in a COURT before a JUDGE who does so.
Anthropocentrism, Anthropomorphism, Supernaturalism, Idealism, sophism, pseudoscience, are all means of lying.
If you can’t say it in operational language you don’t know what you’re talking about. You’re just a trained monkey. A semi-domesticated animal we have released from slavery and serfdom in the hope that normative, economic and legal institutions can provide you with sufficient incentives to contribute to the polity rather than drag the rest of us back in to dysgenia, ignorance, poverty, and suffering with you in your natural state.
Hence why we must rule (fully humans), and you must be ruled (undomesticated semi-humans.).
I DON’T ERR – That’s my RECORD. I don’t ERR. Because I don’t make claims (put forth formal arguments) that I can’t construct as formal arguments (proofs) using all eight dimensions perceivable by man.
I just can’t afford to invest this heavily in correcting the lies of every addict that seeks to preserve his malinvestment in network of lies, rather than learning how to translate that network of lies into truthful speech.
Cheers.
IN REPLY TO:
@curtd
SUPERNATURAL LIARS ALL – A SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF DEITIES AS SYSTEMS OF MEASUREMENT I don’t make errors. It’s my job. My job is to articulate the law that prevents liars (or technically, addicts who lie) from further harm to the population by creating false narratives, of false debts, and false causes. My principal challenge is in collecting enough errors from an individual that I can thoroughly falsify is or her methods of lying by identifying (a) means of lying, (b) motive for lying (c) opportunity to engage in the lie – where opportunity is simply demonstrated by the act of attempting to argue with me. 1. Define “Scientism” “The cosmetic application of science in unwarranted situations not amenable to application of the scientific method or similar scientific standards.” or “In the philosophy of science, the term scientism frequently implies a critique of the more extreme expressions of logical positivism” or” an uncritical eagerness to accept any result described as scientific” (taken from wiki – those are the three criteria that I know of. None of which claim scientific claims do not defeat fictionalisms, but that science (social science in particular) may make false or trivial or irrelevant claims.) That is not the case in the distinction between the supernatural and the natural, but between variations in the natural, and normative. 2. —“accept … god exists”– If one does not place faith in the existence of a deity for which there is no evidence other than human fictionalism. Where as like all ancient anthropocentric, and anthropomorphic pretense of knowledge has fallen to falsehood rapidly under scientific investigation. In other words, if a theory is anthropocentric, and anthropomorphic, and unbound by naturalism (itself counter to anthropocentrism and anthropomorphism), then it corresponds MOST with ignorance, error, wishful thinking, fictionalism and deceit (lying). All such claims are false. We can find NO such claims that are NOT false. 3. —“science”– Science consists of warrantied due diligence by the exhaustive, systematic, falsification of human tendency to engage in justification of ignorance, knowledge pretense, error, bias, wishful thinking, suggestion, loading, framing, obscurantism, fictionalism(sophism, pseudoscience, and supernaturalism) fraud, and deceit. 4. —“empirical facts”— You did not present empirical facts (theory of an observation of measurement.) You offered opinion on correlation. You did not state the operational causation for the correlation. You CANNOT prove anything, only falsify the alternatives leaving the most competitive solution (parsimonious, consistent, correspondent, operational, rational choice, reciprocal, complete, limited, fully accounted, and coherent (collectively internally consistent). All non-trivial statements are open to falsification by greater parsimony under realism and naturalism (absent the fictionalisms). (continued…. in part 2)
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102445769725073371
