RT @RachelBock9: Many have asked me how I can have a science background and be called to faith, especially after spending my whole adult li…
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 15:22:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185214551249375235
—“”God is love” (1 John 4:8) is bullshit pilpul that really means “love is God,” which is euphemistic code for envy-based care/harm fundamentalism that punishes the strong for being strong and celebrates the weak for being weak.”—Predmetsky Rosenborg
via Michelle German
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 14:18:08 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1185198378793213954
—“”God is love” (1 John 4:8) is bullshit pilpul that really means “love is God,” which is euphemistic code for envy-based care/harm fundamentalism that punishes the strong for being strong and celebrates the weak for being weak.”—Predmetsky Rosenborg
via Michelle German
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-18 10:17:00 UTC
—“In all systems of theology the devil figures as a male person. Yes, it is women who keep the church going.”— Don Marquis
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-17 01:11:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184637975495430144
—“In all systems of theology the devil figures as a male person. Yes, it is women who keep the church going.”— Don Marquis
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-16 21:11:00 UTC
So in other words, this book demonstrates the second Abrahamic (sophomoric) attempt to undermine western civlization: Monotheism in the old world, then Marxism, Feminism, Postmodernism, and ‘Denialism’ now – more embarrassing by far than pretense of religious dogma.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 22:00:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227517340762113
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1184227516552302593
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
I mean, this is another use of Female Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Suggestion, Obscurantism, Sophism and Critique (straw manning) completely ignoring both truth vs falsehood and the necessity of cooperative exchange vs gender specific ideals.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227516552302593
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
I mean, this is another use of Female Gossiping, Shaming, Ridiculing, Moralizing, Psychologizing, Suggestion, Obscurantism, Sophism and Critique (straw manning) completely ignoring both truth vs falsehood and the necessity of cooperative exchange vs gender specific ideals.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1184227516552302593
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8hb5UpTiNo”A LETTER FROM CURT TO THE CHRISTIANS” (so to speak)
~35min. Explaining Prop. Objectives for Religion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8hb5UpTiNoUpdated Oct 15, 2019, 4:48 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 16:48:00 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8hb5UpTiNoNEW VIDEO: “A LETTER TO CHRISTIANS”
~35 Minutes. Explaining Objectives.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8hb5UpTiNoUpdated Oct 15, 2019, 4:40 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 16:40:00 UTC
—“”I can believe in natural law in itself because I see evidence of it all around me. That’s what I attribute all the beauty of creation to.””—@[1655513331:2048:Martin Štěpán] via Alain DwightUpdated Oct 15, 2019, 2:15 PM
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-15 14:15:00 UTC
@rasterman I don’t know enough from what I can gather there, but islam is not good for people at all either. So while he’s practicing bias, and error, he’s not using GSRRM or baiting into hazard, or sophism or any other abrahamic technique.
Source date (UTC): 2019-10-14 22:46:24 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102963162946021975