1. the (evil people) created a universal religion of undermining out of a need to providing solace/social order to the slave, serf, and underclasses. This is a legitimate problem that needed solving b/c aristocratic religions treated them as domesticated animals (proto-humans).
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Theme: Religion
-
1. the (evil people) created a universal religion of undermining out of a need t
-
Let’s keep this going – although I’m busy at the moment. Christianity evidently
Let’s keep this going – although I’m busy at the moment. Christianity evidently works as an interim stage of development, if and only if it is offset by the martial empirical aristocracy and rule of law. My concern is not getting rid of it. It’s with replacing it w/ better.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
Let’s keep this going – although I’m busy at the moment. Christianity evidently
Let’s keep this going – although I’m busy at the moment. Christianity evidently works as an interim stage of development, if and only if it is offset by the martial empirical aristocracy and rule of law. My concern is not getting rid of it. It’s with replacing it w/ better.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 16:11:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312787531491139593
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312773075146997762
-
Again. Correct. Although my failing here is interpreting those words in the cont
Again. Correct. Although my failing here is interpreting those words in the context of the time, whereas that is not how Christians (or others) interpret them.
He’s solving the prisoners’ dilemma of zero trust, excessive familism and tribalism and continuous defection.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
Again. Correct. Although my failing here is interpreting those words in the cont
Again. Correct. Although my failing here is interpreting those words in the context of the time, whereas that is not how Christians (or others) interpret them.
He’s solving the prisoners’ dilemma of zero trust, excessive familism and tribalism and continuous defection.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 16:02:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312785161386426368
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312773075146997762
-
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), j
This is the net reason against theocracy (individual, personal, via-positiva), just as it is the net reason for rule of law (collective impersonal, via-negativa).
I suppose I should harden this argument analytically since as you’ve indirectly suggested it’s point of demarcation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 14:58:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312769190445621248
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312750542335041536
-
Truth about ourselves is obvious but no longer as important as the truth about t
Truth about ourselves is obvious but no longer as important as the truth about the enemy, what to do about them, and how to prevent another fall of the west by their abrahamic means of deceit.
Reply addressees: @BillCor57660237 -
Truth about ourselves is obvious but no longer as important as the truth about t
Truth about ourselves is obvious but no longer as important as the truth about the enemy, what to do about them, and how to prevent another fall of the west by their abrahamic means of deceit.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-02 23:11:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312168328954224641
Reply addressees: @BillCor57660237
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312151565742960645
-
4 – We are either an army or not. Without a militia we are no longer an army tha
4 – We are either an army or not. Without a militia we are no longer an army that puts REPORTING (empirical testimony) above all else, leaving sophistry, and religion for the weak and the women.
Until we have an army to join on a great mission we will fail.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-02 22:58:33 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312165101063921664
Reply addressees: @Emelianenko1889 @JFGariepy
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312164389273784323
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@Emelianenko1889 @JFGariepy 3 – Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig. The left needs only evoke impulse of being left behind. The right requires we teach a hierarchy of emotional, sophomoric, semi-scientific, egoistic males to sing.
Without an army we have no conductor.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312164389273784323