2. (a)Eradication of hatred from the human heart. (b)The extension of kinship love to kindred, (c)The demand for personal acts of charity to do so. (d)The exhaustion of forgiveness in pursuit of cooperation, before boycott, ostracization, punishment, or war.
Theme: Religion
-
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfu
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfully ignorant, or addictively deceptive (in denialism).
1. Christian ethics can be stated scientifically and I have done so. … https://twitter.com/bishkebab4/status/1312791345015091200
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 19:30:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312837493360930818
-
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfu
0. I can’t figure out why this is so hard to understand, or if people are willfully ignorant, or addictively deceptive (in denialism).
1. Christian ethics can be stated scientifically and I have done so. … https://t.co/Zj0xxTsuff -
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear the cost of that payment it’s a good system of ethics – exhaustion of forgiveness will work. It does not scale AT ALL because the info is no longer available to us. ERGO leftism = disinformation.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:55:54 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828812649017344
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828555127123970
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bishkebab4 —” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”—
I answered that already, but I guess it didn’t stick. Apples and oranges. Ethics vs Politics vs Science. It’s a defense of interpersonal social relations that are rationally calculable from direct experience: And Not Commons.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312828555127123970
-
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear
Or more simply: If you can pay for it yourself, and judge that payment, and bear the cost of that payment it’s a good system of ethics – exhaustion of forgiveness will work. It does not scale AT ALL because the info is no longer available to us. ERGO leftism = disinformation.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”— I answered that already, but
—” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”—
I answered that already, but I guess it didn’t stick. Apples and oranges. Ethics vs Politics vs Science. It’s a defense of interpersonal social relations that are rationally calculable from direct experience: And Not Commons.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:54:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828555127123970
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828013537628162
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bishkebab4 2. These people were illiterate ignorant semi-humans on the edge of starvation and suffering.
3. The only logic that they knew of, and only moral language that they knew of was empathic and supernatural – they were primitive
4. The solution was correct: hyper-socialization.Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312828013537628162
-
” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”— I answered that already, but
—” a rational defence of modern leftist ethics,”—
I answered that already, but I guess it didn’t stick. Apples and oranges. Ethics vs Politics vs Science. It’s a defense of interpersonal social relations that are rationally calculable from direct experience: And Not Commons.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
2. These people were illiterate ignorant semi-humans on the edge of starvation a
2. These people were illiterate ignorant semi-humans on the edge of starvation and suffering.
3. The only logic that they knew of, and only moral language that they knew of was empathic and supernatural – they were primitive
4. The solution was correct: hyper-socialization.
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:52:44 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312828013537628162
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312827398128271361
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@bishkebab4 1. the (evil people) created a universal religion of undermining out of a need to providing solace/social order to the slave, serf, and underclasses. This is a legitimate problem that needed solving b/c aristocratic religions treated them as domesticated animals (proto-humans).
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1312827398128271361
-
2. These people were illiterate ignorant semi-humans on the edge of starvation a
2. These people were illiterate ignorant semi-humans on the edge of starvation and suffering.
3. The only logic that they knew of, and only moral language that they knew of was empathic and supernatural – they were primitive
4. The solution was correct: hyper-socialization.
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4 -
1. the (evil people) created a universal religion of undermining out of a need t
1. the (evil people) created a universal religion of undermining out of a need to providing solace/social order to the slave, serf, and underclasses. This is a legitimate problem that needed solving b/c aristocratic religions treated them as domesticated animals (proto-humans).
Source date (UTC): 2020-10-04 18:50:17 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312827398128271361
Reply addressees: @bishkebab4
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1312791345015091200