Theme: Religion

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.

  • Natural Religion: The Price We Must Pay

    P-Law will produce the wants of Reactionaries: “life, family, community, quality”. It will just do it using formal logic, law, and court as market for suppression of violators that is very difficult if not impossible to undermine, instead of mythology, philosophy, or religion.

    Groups must use organizations and generations that require an oppressive authority to indoctrinate values. If you have a ‘book’ that is not scripture but science, not wisdom but law, then religion to indoctrinate people will evolve within it, and that law will be absorbed by it.

    I’m not a storyteller but a formal scientist, and don’t see it as my job to produce mythology, religion, or indoctrination – that’s a creative enterprise, not a scientific one. My job, the P-Judiciary’s job, and P-Law’s job is to DOCUMENT the law of nature and nature’s god.

    So you may not see my work as religious but that’s because a religion of man, nature, and nature’s god need contain no lies, no false promises, no sophistry, nothing supernatural, and survives by the sheer ‘wonder’ of the universe that we are born to master, transform, and rule.

    So there need be no difference between truth, science, law, politics, and religion, if there are no human lies therein. And instead, our religion consists of the wonder of each of us cooperating by competing AND insuring one another as we revel in transcendence not resistance.

    There is only one price to pay for such a religion and that is regulation of the reproduction of the population at the bottom, and compensating them for their ‘loss’. Most religions – all Abrahamic religions – are today devolutionary instead. Anti-man, anti-evolutionary cults.

  • It’s not me that matters. It’s anyone. Your very question contains your failure.

    It’s not me that matters. It’s anyone.
    Your very question contains your failure.
    No one matters. You either have a plan or you don’t.
    This isn’t a religion


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 22:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323748280350740480

    Reply addressees: @MartianOrthodox @ThruTheHayes

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323746759324164097

  • Q&A: “Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”

    Q&A: “Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?” https://propertarianinstitute.com/2020/11/03/qa-curt-what-are-your-thoughts-on-godels-ontological-proof/


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 22:04:16 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323747853265719296

  • Q&A: “Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”

    —“Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”—ArguingFanatic @ArguingFanatic

    (a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
    (b) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
    (c) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions. 
    (d) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
    (e) Logic falsifies not justifies
    (f) And we must falsify BOTH words (consistency) and actions (operational possibility and resulting correspondence)
    (g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies. 


    It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism. (Scriptural ‘interpretation’)

    Philosophy is dead for truth. 
    Its limit is choice.

  • Q&A: “Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”

    —“Curt what are your thoughts on Gödel’s ontological proof?”—ArguingFanatic @ArguingFanatic

    (a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
    (b) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
    (c) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions. 
    (d) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
    (e) Logic falsifies not justifies
    (f) And we must falsify BOTH words (consistency) and actions (operational possibility and resulting correspondence)
    (g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies. 


    It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism. (Scriptural ‘interpretation’)

    Philosophy is dead for truth. 
    Its limit is choice.

  • That’s what frustrates me. Everything good in Xianity can be counted on the fing

    That’s what frustrates me. Everything good in Xianity can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And it’s SCIENTIFICALLY TRUE. But for some reason people feel this desperate need for woo that is just incomprehensible to the rest of us. Yeah. We need some kinda church. Not lies.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 21:33:11 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323740030800723969

  • RT @andrewtwalk: One thing that is certain regardless of tonight’s outcome: A ne

    RT @andrewtwalk: One thing that is certain regardless of tonight’s outcome: A new phase of White Evangelical Recrimination think-pieces, wh…


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 21:11:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323734540247015425

  • Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM By: @curtd (a) It’s not Godel’s it’

    Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM
    By: @curtd

    (a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
    (c) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
    (b) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions.
    (d) Logic falsifies not justifies
    (e) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
    (f) And we must falsify BOTH words and actions.
    (g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies.
    It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 21:05:59 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105148580089633992

  • The Ultimate Religion is not the religion of everyone. It’s the religion of ever

    The Ultimate Religion is not the religion of everyone. It’s the religion of everyone capable of it. The rest, frankly, they don’t matter.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-11-03 16:51:27 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1323669127215648768