Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM By: @curtd (a) It’s not Godel’s it’

Boost of @BHaze SOPHISTRY FROM SCRIPTURALISM
By: @curtd

(a) It’s not Godel’s it’s just his most recent restatement.
(c) A proof is a test of internal consistency of its axioms not external correspondence or operational possibility.
(b) Proofs test axioms and words. Theories test premises and actions.
(d) Logic falsifies not justifies
(e) Actions are informationally more complete than words.
(f) And we must falsify BOTH words and actions.
(g) There are no such things as ‘ontological proofs’ in and of themselves that are other than meaningless tautologies.
It’s all just sophistry inherited from scripturalism.