That’s illogical since the principles preceded christianity.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-10 03:25:53 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822112105169928256
Reply addressees: @cryptohodler16
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822074323747700954
–“It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”–
Odd. Let’s examine:
It’s a question of priorities.
1. Physical Science (true)
2. Natural Law (good)
3. Christian Ethics (virtuous)
..are all compatible.
But only in that order.
Any other order requires you lie to yourself and others.
If you claim you are a christian with some other order of priorities, then I question your intelligence, ability, and opinion. And as such your value as a participant in political (formal) rather than personal and social (informal) decisions.
That does not mean you cannot equally preserve the supernatural heaven, hell, angels and god. It means that you, as directed by St Aquinas, render unto science, render unto law, and render unto god their due.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 23:36:01 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822054256716779520
–“It’s surprising that some Christians still follow Curt Doolittle.”–
Odd. Let’s examine:
It’s a question of priorities.
1. Physical Science (true)
2. Natural Law (good)
3. Christian Ethics (virtuous)
..are all compatible.
But only in that order.
Any other order requires you lie to yourself and others.
If you claim you are a christian with some other order of priorities, then I question your intelligence, ability, and opinion. And as such your value as a participant in political (formal) rather than personal and social (informal) decisions.
That does not mean you cannot equally preserve the supernatural heaven, hell, angels and god. It means that you, as directed by St Aquinas, render unto science, render unto law, and render unto god their due.
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 23:33:59 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1822053744504172545
RT @ThruTheHayes: THE SUBSTRATE CULTURE
You must study the substrate culture not the religion.
-@Michael_Yon
The substrate culture is co…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-09 16:55:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821953381532930222
sorry, but religion in the sense of supernatural religion has failed – it will continue its decline until it hits the margin of about twenty percent, most of whom will be women, because supernatural religion requires an empathic mind (not a systemic one despite the efforts of theologians), and the modern world cannot tolerate the supernatural and occult except at that margin, because it is systemically inconsistent with observed existence.
Supernatural Religion evolved to suppress neuroticism (negative thoughts) and spread by men who used it to regulate women and simple men.
It doesn’t work any longer.
China benefited from it’s retention of philosophy and evasion of abrahamic and hindu religion. It could tolerate buddhism which is more a way of life stated in pseudoscience than a religion.
Reply addressees: @23snakehead
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 19:56:24 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821636600331116544
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821635439838564660
THE PROBLEM OF MODERNITY AND THE REASON WHY RELIGION FAILED AND LEFTIST PSEUDOSCIENCE AND IDEOLOGY ARE THE NEW CULTS.
Most humans are cognitively simple. Very. Most cannot grasp more than one dimension of causality, and the vast majority cannot grasp even one logical negative within that one dimension. Largely humans imitate, they rarely think and reason in any sense of the term because they lack the ability to.
It’s a miracle that we survive in modernity at all.
If there is a relative monopoly of frames of reference, and that frame varies little from the physical (material), natural (cooperative), and evolutionary (genetic, cultural, institutional) laws, then the burden of reason is reduced by the vast distribution of knowledge production transportation and incentives.
The problem is that religion can do so but at very high cost of resistance to evolutionary, cultural, and institutional development – because religion on its face does and must counter these laws. So one can produce a monopoly that is trivially easy to grasp, trivially easy to practice, but also trivially easy to stagnate, produce dysgenia, and decline.
So we must produce the equivalent of a religion that is relatively easy to grasp even if it takes training, but does not diverge from the Physical and Natural, and Evolutionary Laws.
Cheers
CD
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-08 19:50:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1821635104294174720
RT @AutistocratMS: I don’t support assimilation in general but the premise centrists have about it is that religion and culture are differe…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-07 00:05:15 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820974447584518647
–“I learned a new word. “Shebrews”.–
(Humor)
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-06 16:07:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1820854289842970720
RT @ThruTheHayes: IT’S JUST BEYOND BELIEF
faith > belief > trust > confidence > certainty
Faith can be categorized as, short of belief. T…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-03 18:50:06 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819807974858366990
RT @ThruTheHayes: BE LIKE JESUS FLIP TABLES AND WHIP BANKERS
IMPROPER AND IRRESPONSIBLE IMITATION IS IMMORAL
Imitate Jesus. There wasn’t…
Source date (UTC): 2024-08-02 23:24:02 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1819514523683864592