Theme: Religion

  • @JqhigginsIII @voxday I’m waiting for the woodshed. Hell. I’m waiting for some w

    @JqhigginsIII@voxday I’m waiting for the woodshed. Hell. I’m waiting for some wood. I mean. Even, say a popsicle stick. So far all I see are flacid little christian boys wishing they had a couple inches of wood. lol


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 23:40:05 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107765013258088704

  • @no_slunk @veraticus @voxday Again. You’re proving my point that abrahamism teac

    @no_slunk@veraticus@voxday Again. You’re proving my point that abrahamism teaches you to claim knowledge you do not have, to lie, and to socially construct falsehoods.

    Can you testify that I’m not just covered in sweat from the summer heat, and inability to regulate my body temperature becasue I lack a thyroid, and take a number of allergy medicationst that exacerbate the problem?

    No, you can only lie.

    You lied. I know you are going to lie. Because christianity is a lie and all abrahamic religion consists of is a vast compilation of lies, using the female means of lying and denying using pilpul, gssrm, critique, social construction, lying and denying.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 21:41:40 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764547609755200

  • @RenegadeScoutr @Snidely_Whiplash @voxday You just lied again by 1) equating dev

    @RenegadeScoutr@Snidely_Whiplash@voxday You just lied again by

    1) equating devotion (religion) to trust (science)
    Faith (religion) > Belief (Philosohy) > Trust (Action (economics, law))

    2) equating science(testifiable) to a faith(specifically because its untestifiable)

    3) equating the absence of trust in the untestifiable (science) with faith(religion) in the untestifiable specifically because it is untestifiable.

    4) science consists of the application of testimony outside of the field of its origin in the law. In the adversarial marketplace to falsify competing statements, that which survives falsification is the truth candidate. This is not true of faith (social construction of a falsehood). Instead, that which is desirable survives and propagates. Not because it is true – but because it is false and desirable. Why? We only need to know what is true in order to resolve conflicts. We can invent truth, falshood, fraud, and deceit in order to coerce others in to giving us what we want.

    This is why abrahamic religoin spreads: its a lie simple people want to be true. Because it means they are good by social constuction not by the evience of their actions in life.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 20:11:13 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107764191934489504

  • @TheMakhairaofTruth @Autisticone1 @voxday Thank you for confirming that only lia

    @TheMakhairaofTruth@Autisticone1@voxday Thank you for confirming that only liars fail to make arguments, and instead state the pretense of having made one.

    Again, Abrahamic religions are constructed by the female use of false seduction by false promise of freedom from the physical, behavioral, and evolutionary laws of the universe, by the use of social construction of falsehoods, using storytelling, fictionalism, deceit, and denial, but … as you’ve just demonstrated … pretense of knowledge that is not and cannot be demonstrated.

    That ist he meaning of faith: pretense of knowledge that isn’t, cannot be, demonstrated, as a means of social constructon of falsehoods (Frauds) to sedate the inferior from the psychological pressures of there inferiority given the accumulated genetic defect that they demonstrate by every display word or deed.

    You should not argue with me. The correct response to any qusetioning of faith is and only every can be “I choose to have faith regardless of the evidence, because faith is a construct of the mind, not the evidence’.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 18:34:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763811971300041

  • RE: CREATIONIST TAKING WISDOM LITERATURE SERIOUSLY @AngeloJohnGage I understand.

    RE: CREATIONIST TAKING WISDOM LITERATURE SERIOUSLY

    @AngeloJohnGage I understand. However, for the edification of others, I’ll state that (a) mythologizing is the Middle East’s equivalent of Chinese stories, poems, sayings, and self contradiction, versus the West’s sequence of (testable) structured, logical, clauses. This spectrum mirrors the sequence of development from childhood to adulthood: empathizing-imitating, following rules, making evidentiary decisions. And again, ths spectrum mirrors the sequence of development from childhood to adulthood by imitation ethics, then rule ethics, then outcome ethics. And this mirrors the evolution of the sciences from analogistic, to empirical, to operational. So the middle east was compensating for the low level of development of very primitive people using the language and logic of children. There is an evolutionary reason for this becuase it mirrors (implements) the mother’s means of maintaining seduction of children by pretense of caretaking by telling them stories that encourage them to keep trying to mature and learn despite their weakness, inability and ignorance. It means fundamentalism is an attempt to seduce the weak into permanent infantilism.

    There is more content in that paragraph than is apparent on first reading.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 17:07:35 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763469849207289

  • @AngeloJohnGage I understand. However, for the edification of others, I’ll state

    @AngeloJohnGage I understand. However, for the edification of others, I’ll state that (a) mythologizing is the Middle East’s equivalent of Chinese stories, poems, sayings, and self contradiction, versus the West’s sequence of (testable) structured, logical, clauses. This spectrum mirrors the sequence of development from childhood to adulthood: empathizing-imitating, following rules, making evidentiary decisions. And again, ths spectrum mirrors the sequence of development from childhood to adulthood by imitation ethics, then rule ethics, then outcome ethics. And this mirrors the evolution of the sciences from analogistic, to empirical, to operational. So the middle east was compensating for the low level of development of very primitive people using the language and logic of children. There is an evolutionary reason for this becuase it mirrors (implements) the mother’s means of maintaining seduction of children by pretense of caretaking by telling them stories that encourage them to keep trying to mature and learn despite their weakness, inability and ignorance.

    There is more content in that paragraph than is apparent on first reading.

    Cheers.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 17:06:36 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763466039804098

  • Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious fol

    Boost of @AngeloJohnGage Creationists (who are a dying minority of religious folks) refuse to realize their “holy books” are not meant to be taken literally; that goat-herding, sand-dwellers 2000 years ago, literally got everything wrong, and we can objectively verify those things to be wrong with several fields of science, so much so, that the majority of Christian scientists accept evolution: one because it is a fact, and two, because it has literally nothing to do with the existence of God, or how life began on Earth (that is abiogenesis)—evolution is simply how life evolves. But because Creationists take their “holy books” literally, they cannot accept a single fact, and must deny everything, in the face of proof, otherwise they think that God doesn’t exist, or the Bible is false, when it is obvious that the Bible, and other religious texts, are manmade and have no bearing on whether God, or any gods, exist. One can easily be religious and accept the FACT of evolution, by understanding that if God exists, he created self-replicating life that evolved into everything he wanted it to, including humans.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 16:13:54 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107763466529715495

  • @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done t

    @voxday There is zero chance you’re smarter than I am. Zero chance you’ve done the math. And an absolute certainty you’re quoting a Yale professor of theology who also claimed he’d done the math. And both of you proving that the function of Abrahamism is to teach adherence to lie so that they can engage in social construction of falsehoods, in order to collectively obtain false confidence is by false pretense of sexual, social, political, economic, military, status, explaining their evasion (or failure) of evolutionary adaptation, precisely because they lack that status by demonstrable means other than social construction of falsehoods.

    The female means of lying by undermining truth and social construction of falsehoods: Judaism > Christianity > Islam … Marxism > Neo-Marxism > Postmodernism > PC-Woke.

    Same tactics (female undermining of truth) same strategy (social construction of a falsehood that attempts to deny evolutionary superiority) and same result (Dark Age of Ignorance and Superstition).

    That’s the truth of why you lie, the history of why you lie, and the technique by which you lie, and the evolutionary origin of how and why you lie, in the female means of anti-social behavior, economic, political, cultural, civilizational warfare, because the female is weaker, and must seduce with false promises (lie) and undermine with disinformation (lie) by fomenting insurrection (war) because of her (your) weakness.

    Period. End of Story. So, Accusation Submitted. Argument Presented. Judgment Presented. Conviction Issued. The only question is the sentencing and the punishment for your crimes against humanity.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 14:45:08 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107762909718064410

  • @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham

    @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760742308253663

  • Boost of @curtd @voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: A

    Boost of @curtd@voxday A painful truth. If there is a devil we know his name: Abraham.


    Source date (UTC): 2022-02-08 05:33:56 UTC

    Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/107760744363252054