http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/mar/05/five-hundred-fairytales-discovered-germany
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 09:50:00 UTC
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2012/mar/05/five-hundred-fairytales-discovered-germany
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-25 09:50:00 UTC
ALL INCREASE IN THE INTEREST IN LIBERTY HAS BEEN IN CLASSICAL LIBERALISM: BECAUSE IT”S MORAL, AND LIBERTINISM (ROTHBARDIANISM) ISN’T
(reposted from a comment to Boettke)
As far as I know, all movement toward the libertarian spectrum over the past decade has been toward the Classical Liberal values, which are of psychological and normative construction, rather than toward the anarchic, economic and empirical.
Morals move political orders, not utility. If utility moved political orders the protestant countries would have spent, not engaged in austerity. But humans will suffer great losses to punish the immoral. We could not have evolved as a species otherwise.
Economic universalism was one thing under homogenous polities. But, particularly after Rawls, and the postmodern assault on the west, academia, in no small part because it appealed to the new broader customer base, and its willingness to pay for access to universities, proposed universal morality instead of recognizing that moral codes reflect reproductive strategies, and that no universal moral code is expressible in politics across morally heterogeneous peoples. Not unless we invert Pareto and simply agree to punish the most moral people and fund the least moral peoples. (Which is what we do, which is why redistribution is dysgenic, and politically factionalizing.)
So until economics re-incorporates morality into the study of political economy, economics (particularly the aggregation ‘dishonest socialism’ of the Keynesians) will remain a tool of state expansion and friction creation rather than a ‘science’ which corresponds to long term reality.
We do what we measure. A fortune 1000 company can burn its brand value for short term profits. A people an burn its normative capital for short term consumption. But in the end, the ability both the brand and the polity to survive competition long term is harmed by that consumption of accumulated capital.
We have to put morality back into economics.
This is what Mises got wrong – or at least, never managed to get right.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-24 04:17:00 UTC
“You’re not a true libertarian” = “You do not believe in the one true god.”
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-21 14:07:00 UTC
Adam, do you know of any (academic and secular) comparisons of buddhist and stoic thought and practice? Differences in verbal skills required? Perhaps suitability for social classes? Do you have any ideas or opinions on that contrast? -Thanks in advance.
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-21 04:54:00 UTC
HAPPY TEMPLARS DAY!!!!! FRIDAY THE 13TH!!
Source date (UTC): 2014-06-13 07:51:00 UTC
[C]onvenient. Isn’t it? You can feel good that you’re a beta, but you don’t have to do anything about it except whine. Feed the internal social status junkie? Just like progressives feed it by conspicuous consumption of other people’s wealth? (Nuff said?) If you’re not a beta. And you’re not a coward. And you’re not a free-rider, and you desire liberty in practice rather liberty in fantasy, come over to Aristocratic Egalitarianism. Liberty for alphas. No pussy-tarians allowed. Liberty is obtained against the will of free riders at the end of pointy objects. Property rights are obtained in exchange for insuring the property rights of others who do the same. www.propertarianism.com ht: Chris Lavan
[C]onvenient. Isn’t it? You can feel good that you’re a beta, but you don’t have to do anything about it except whine. Feed the internal social status junkie? Just like progressives feed it by conspicuous consumption of other people’s wealth? (Nuff said?) If you’re not a beta. And you’re not a coward. And you’re not a free-rider, and you desire liberty in practice rather liberty in fantasy, come over to Aristocratic Egalitarianism. Liberty for alphas. No pussy-tarians allowed. Liberty is obtained against the will of free riders at the end of pointy objects. Property rights are obtained in exchange for insuring the property rights of others who do the same. www.propertarianism.com ht: Chris Lavan
Sorry. But I like church. I like monumental architecture. I like Catholic pageantry. I like Protestant ceremony. I wish we still ‘stood and voiced our minds’. I prefer the heroic pagan ethos to that of christian suffering. I prefer the historical narrative of Athens to that of Babylonian mysticism. But mostly I like the whole listening and singing and chanting together thing – because for a few minutes each week I get to feel part of an enormous extended family – a big, safe, pack. It has never bothered me that some people do not distinguish between mystical allegory and historical fact, while others fail to grasp the value of mystical allegory as more accessible, less subject to human error, and less fragile than reason. The reason that religion can be a problem is because we can, especially under democracy, use government to apply violence based upon on mythological principles, rather than use religion as a means of including others in our manners, ethics, morals, myths and rituals so that we extend kinship trust to those who are not our kin, and to ostracize those who will not adopt those manners, ethics, morals, myths and rituals. Not because myths and rituals are true, but because the cost of observing those myths and rituals is evidence of one’s commitment to his moral kin. Secular ratio-scientific education provides us with myths, but few and infrequent rituals, and ignores the necessity to pay costs to demonstrate and adhere to kinship trust that facilitates the extension of kinship trust. Consumerism is a nice temporary alternative to kin, but it’s a devil’s bargain. We are lost and lonely at the end of that selfish satisfaction.
Sorry. But I like church. I like monumental architecture. I like Catholic pageantry. I like Protestant ceremony. I wish we still ‘stood and voiced our minds’. I prefer the heroic pagan ethos to that of christian suffering. I prefer the historical narrative of Athens to that of Babylonian mysticism. But mostly I like the whole listening and singing and chanting together thing – because for a few minutes each week I get to feel part of an enormous extended family – a big, safe, pack. It has never bothered me that some people do not distinguish between mystical allegory and historical fact, while others fail to grasp the value of mystical allegory as more accessible, less subject to human error, and less fragile than reason. The reason that religion can be a problem is because we can, especially under democracy, use government to apply violence based upon on mythological principles, rather than use religion as a means of including others in our manners, ethics, morals, myths and rituals so that we extend kinship trust to those who are not our kin, and to ostracize those who will not adopt those manners, ethics, morals, myths and rituals. Not because myths and rituals are true, but because the cost of observing those myths and rituals is evidence of one’s commitment to his moral kin. Secular ratio-scientific education provides us with myths, but few and infrequent rituals, and ignores the necessity to pay costs to demonstrate and adhere to kinship trust that facilitates the extension of kinship trust. Consumerism is a nice temporary alternative to kin, but it’s a devil’s bargain. We are lost and lonely at the end of that selfish satisfaction.
http://www.propertarianism.com/ROTHBARDIAN LIBERTARIANISM: A RELIGION FOR BETAS.
Convenient. Isn’t it? You can feel good that you’re a beta, but you don’t have to do anything about it except whine. Feed the internal social status junkie? Just like progressives feed it by conspicuous consumption of other people’s wealth?
(Nuff said?)
If you’re not a beta. And you’re not a coward. And you’re not a free-rider, and you desire liberty in practice rather liberty in fantasy, come over to Aristocratic Egalitarianism. Liberty for alphas. No pussy-tarians allowed. 😉
Liberty is obtained against the will of free riders at the end of pointy objects. Property rights are obtained in exchange for insuring the property rights of others who do the same.
www.propertarianism.com
ht: Chris Lavan
Source date (UTC): 2014-05-15 07:16:00 UTC