Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • If Christianity is so good, why can’t it survive in the market for meaning?

    If Christianity is so good, why can’t it survive in the market for meaning?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:49:00 UTC

  • Why did Christianity and Aristocracy fail, and Critical Theory (Cultural Marxism

    Why did Christianity and Aristocracy fail, and Critical Theory (Cultural Marxism) succeed?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:48:00 UTC

  • Why is christianity failing in the market for religions?

    Why is christianity failing in the market for religions?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:47:00 UTC

  • So is the avenue of attack then against paul and his lies, and in favor of Jesus

    So is the avenue of attack then against paul and his lies, and in favor of Jesus and his advice? (universalism)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:52:00 UTC

  • JESUS DIDN’T INVENT CHRISTIANITY, PAUL DID. by Steve Akins Jesus didn’t invent C

    JESUS DIDN’T INVENT CHRISTIANITY, PAUL DID.

    by Steve Akins

    Jesus didn’t invent Christianity, a Jew named Saul of Tarsus (who never met Jesus during his lifetime) started the cult of Jesus worship that became Christianity by claiming that Jesus was the “only begotten son” of the Jewish god, Yahweh, and that his execution was the ultimate sacrificial offering to Yahweh to atone for all of the sins of humanity. Saul (or Paul) went about trying to convince the denizens of the Roman Empire that this dead Jew named Jesus was “God” incarnate, who died and then resurrected himself and ascended into heaven, and whose law was to love your enemies and to treat foreigners as your own family, so that through the adoption of this Jew-created cult, the Roman Empire that had conquered Judea and destroyed the Jews temple in Jerusalem, was ultimately destroyed by being subjugated though the adoption of this cult of tolerance, just as the Jews intended.

    by Curt Doolittle

    Jews (Paul) adopted the female strategy against alphas: gossip.

    Jesus was brilliant as a philosopher, even a philosopher in primitive verse. It was Paul who made it into the first version of marxism.

    Intolerance is a virtue (cost) not a vice (discount).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:49:00 UTC

  • DUAL ETHICS by Ivan Ilakovac In dual ethics the distinction is made between the

    DUAL ETHICS

    by Ivan Ilakovac

    In dual ethics the distinction is made between the members of your group and those that are outside of the group. Hence the hate and genocidal attitude towards goyim and infidels. In universal ethics there is no such distinction. Everyone is equal (under the Law.)

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 07:31:00 UTC

  • JESUS’ INNOVATIONS by Aaron Kahland I’m no expert on the subject but my intuitio

    JESUS’ INNOVATIONS

    by Aaron Kahland

    I’m no expert on the subject but my intuition is that Jesus launched a veiled rebellion against the Old Testament.

    He rejected dual ethics and replaced it with universal ethics the latter of which was crucial for the rule of law.

    Islam then reintroduced dual ethics.

    It is of no surprise to those who believe (as I do) that Islam was constructed from Jewish religious texts.

    I would argue that Jesus differentiated between personal morality and the law (ethics) – a crucial innovation.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 05:51:00 UTC

  • by James Augustus —“I don’t really think that you got the answer you were look

    by James Augustus

    —“I don’t really think that you got the answer you were looking for. It seemed more of an observation that the church failed along with other institutions, but not specifically *why* the church failed, which I think is not to difficult to explain.

    The church failed because in a market for lies, the most comforting lies (Cultural Marxism) will out-compete less comforting lies (Christianity), not to mention uncomfortable truths (Aristocracy).

    The solution, of course, is what you state, and repeatedly: truth.”—

    And there we go. 🙂

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 04:24:00 UTC

  • WHY GO AFTER THE CHURCH SO HARD TODAY? —“Curt: Did someone steal your sacramen

    WHY GO AFTER THE CHURCH SO HARD TODAY?

    —“Curt: Did someone steal your sacramental wine? Never saw you go after the church so hard.”—Arnold Brunson

    I am just trying to gin up some arguments to see what kind of reactions people have.

    Our church failed to compete with the new church that replaced it. The new church is evil as hell. But can the old church compete? How can we produce a church of europe that CAN compete with Cultural Marxism?

    I tried to drive the discussion all day from various angles. (without giving away what I was driving at.) Finally someone got it.

    Why? At someone’s suggestion, I spent last night working on how murderous islam had been until 1920. We only defeated them a century ago and they’re back already.

    But what’s really changed? Marxism is just islam/judaism restated. democratic secular socialist humanism is just marxism restated. Why do we fail? Why did our church fail us for so many centuries. Why did we recover so quickly under empiricism, literacy, and the balance of powers? Why did we develop so quickly under literacy, reason, and the division of powers in the ancient world?

    I know the answer you know and it doesn’t look good for christianity. It just looks good for jesus and the saints.

    Islam is an exceptional religion for idiots, and they are going to win unless we kill them off for good, as well as marxism, judaism, and democratic secular socialist humanism.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 18:08:00 UTC

  • “The Abrahamites still need to rescue their gods from the dry deserts, and show

    —“The Abrahamites still need to rescue their gods from the dry deserts, and show the world how THEY live in peace and harmony with each other.”— Tobie Louw

    ( Don’t talk to me until you clean up your own house so to speak. 🙂 )

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 17:26:00 UTC