Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • by Igor Rogov —“Islam is a chimeric system; it has an appearance of masculine

    by Igor Rogov

    —“Islam is a chimeric system; it has an appearance of masculine animal but the driving force is a very powerful and securely hidden female; in fact way too powerful yet acting behind the scene, stimulating hordes of male offsprings to go and hunt, and conquer more resources and bring home, so that female of Islam can lay more eggs. Male in Islam has no rights, no power whatsoever, except a very few chosen ones it is nearly sexless, thoroughly oppressed creature, institutionalized passive homosexual, which gets out and pretends to be a real man only in large groups and in a permanent war with the rest of the world.”—

    I avoid all psychologism -its archaic and obfuscatory- but this sort of line of thinking is interesting.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 18:19:00 UTC

  • “Christianity [feigning omniscience] did not admit the existence of predators an

    —“Christianity [feigning omniscience] did not admit the existence of predators and the need to protect against them, and Cultural Marxism is a predator. We, in 9ur civilisation need to realise that just because part of it never had to face the predations of islam, such predations still exist and must be accounted for with the kind of vigorous defences our ancestors employed.”—Claire Rae Randall

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:51:00 UTC

  • Why did Gandhi work against Britain? Why did Jesus work against Rome? Why are fe

    Why did Gandhi work against Britain?

    Why did Jesus work against Rome?

    Why are feminine judaism and masculine Islam working against the west?

    Would they work against China?

    Would they work against the Khan?

    The answer is very simple.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:49:00 UTC

  • THANKS TO EVERYONE who contributed to the discussion on religion over the past t

    THANKS TO EVERYONE who contributed to the discussion on religion over the past two days. It was about what I expected. Although what I learned was a) that we have some knowledgeable people, b) that my suspicion about the ability to argue using different techniques is very narrow, c) that people are framed by the church more than world history, and cannot understand the west in the broader context. d) that if we do suggest natural law as the basis for european christianity we can provide consistency between the teachings of jesus as a subject of hellenic and roman civilization, and and the present. e) that it is possible to separate jesus as a reformer of his own people from Paul who attacked roman civilization.. f) … lots more. gotta cut… but anyway, Mandatory Natural Law ends judaism and islamism, since any statement violating natural law is an anathema to man, and constitute a political movement, not a religious movement; …. and both jewish law and islamic law violate Natural Law.

    in other words Natural Law Fundamentalism so to speak, like Natural Law Market Fascism, preserves what we desire, but prohibits the feminins strategy parasitism of the jews by fraud, and the masculine parasitism of the islamists by ignorance.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:44:00 UTC

  • THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH Why did the church fail t

    THE CONTENT OF RELIGION, AND THE FAILURE OF THE CHURCH

    Why did the church fail to reform?

    – anti-intellectualism.

    – superstition rather than myth.

    – peasant rather than middle class

    – agrarian rather than industrialism

    – suffering rather than heroism and possibility.

    – Semitic rather than European.

    Why did the church fail to produce a reformer?

    – why no Augustine, or Luther?

    – why was Smith/Hume/Jefferson insufficient?

    – why no accommodation for Darwin, Menger, Maxwell, Durkheim, Nietzsche?

    The answer:

    Too much of a change. The academy took possession away from the church. The academy took funding away from the church. The state took all lands from the church.

    My response:

    Then it might have been possible if not for the world wars and communism. However, the germans were very close. The british traditionalists were very close. The church could have seized the opportunity, or it could have defeated the opposition: marxism. But it did neither. It was LAZY AND INTELLECTUALLY INCOMPETENT.

    As far as I know, all that matters in a religion is:

    (a) a community setting where individual expression prohibited. (signal free environment)

    (b) a very simple set of comprehensible laws (strategy)

    (c) a method of achieving mindfulness, and excuse for it.

    (d) recitation of myths, legends, history, heroes

    (e) application of past wisdom to current issues.

    (f) participatory rituals (praying, singing, moving).

    (g) participatory holidays ( relief – vacation days )

    (h) participatory feasts (special holidays – family)

    (i) participatory festivals (sports, plays, games)

    (j) an institutional means of transference of all of the above between generations. (profession)

    The acts matter much more than the words. The acts produce the experience. The words JUSTIFY it.

    THE CHURCH WAS SO HEAVILY ANTI INTELLECTUAL IT ABANDONED THE PEOPLE TO THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE ACADEMY, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE STATE, THE PROFIT SEEKING OF THE FINANCIAL SECTOR, AND HID AMONG THE DEVELOPING WORLD’S POOR.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 13:53:00 UTC

  • Have we not transcended? Are we still ignorant, illiterate, poor, lacking knonwl

    Have we not transcended? Are we still ignorant, illiterate, poor, lacking knonwledge, technology and institutions? Do we still require morality by children’s story, rather than by literature, history, law, science, and mathematics?

    Are we admitting we are children and that we are not able to speak and think in the language that the gods have written the universe with?

    if you speak the truth then why must you lie?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:29:00 UTC

  • The judeo christian of the church constitutes a framing: a lie. WHy must you hav

    The judeo christian of the church constitutes a framing: a lie.

    WHy must you have that lie? Can’t you look at history as a greater story than the children’s story of the myths and superstitions? the chidren’s stories for the dim, the ignorant, and the impoverished?

    Why aren’t your own histories superior to those? They are.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:27:00 UTC

  • I can speak the words of natural law in the words of jesus(myths), of augustine(

    I can speak the words of natural law in the words of jesus(myths), of augustine(wisdom), of plato(ideals), and of aristotle(description). WE can obtain meaning from myth, wisdom and ideals, But I will only argue them in the language of truth: Aristotle.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:25:00 UTC

  • To deny Natural Law is to destroy mankind. Islam and Judaism deny natural law

    To deny Natural Law is to destroy mankind. Islam and Judaism deny natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:23:00 UTC

  • Natural Law of the West > Laws of Men, Sharia of Islam, Talmud of Jews. Natural

    Natural Law of the West > Laws of Men, Sharia of Islam, Talmud of Jews.

    Natural Law results in man’s transcendence into gods. Abrahamism, Paul, and Muhammed results in landlessness and parasitism (jews) or mindlessness and parasitism (islam). The god of Abraham is the devil.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:20:00 UTC