Curt Doolittle

Theme: Religion

  • Why Is The Koran Open To Interpretation?

    WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE STATEMENTS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION? If the Koran can be converted to law – a sequence of operationally testable statements, as has all of christendom then why has it not been? If the koran can be converted into law so that it cannot be interpreted, why has it not been? To preserve interpretation rather than decidability?

    If the koran can be interpreted, then how can anyone claim it is law? Laws are decidable. Opinions are not. Until you can reduce literature to laws that are decidable, then one has no claim other than that all DEDUCTIONS FROM IT are in fact REPRESENTATIVE OF IT. In other words, if you can’t DECIDE because of operationally testable statements, then the DECISION is to leave open interpretation. Therefore the decision is to leave open interpretation, and justification of it is just making excuses for licensing interpretation. Therefore all actions derived from interpretation are the result of the decision NOT to eradicate interpretation. In other words, jihadists, in all their flavors, and islamists in all their flavors, are specifically licensed by all other muslims because they have not DENIED them the ability to interpret the Koran, by stating the Koran in decidable verse: a sequence of operationally testable statements. In other words, muslims accommodate terrorist ideologies by not regulating their religion such that it is FREE of terrorist ideologies. Jews and Christians have both historicized and legalized their literature. Islam has NOT historicized and legalized its literature, and resists it at every opportunity. With every denial we see only confirmation: islam licenses jihadis, terrorism, and interpretation. The truth is,that the Koran *CAN* be converted into law. At which point it will be untenable. Which is why it has not been done.

  • Yes. Eliminate islam from europe (once again)

    Yes. Eliminate islam from europe (once again).

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 14:02:08 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872816013464797184

    Reply addressees: @ParthibanRavind @MayorofLondon

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814185280790528

    IN REPLY TO:

    @ParthibanRG

    @MayorofLondon But will you ever address the root cause of terrorism?

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814185280790528

  • @mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the an

    @mayoroflondon London is occupied by the 3rd world in the 2nd Conquest of the ancient civilization of the Isles. First romans, now Islam.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 14:00:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872815593283612672

  • @mayoroflondon The safest cities in the world are homogenous european and christ

    @mayoroflondon The safest cities in the world are homogenous european and christian. PERIOD. The Levantine Lie cannot spread to europe.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 13:57:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814864053530624

  • @mayoroflondon How are muslims in Britain not collaborators? Civilians saying “B

    @mayoroflondon How are muslims in Britain not collaborators? Civilians saying “But I’m not a solider!” Yet sponsoring the army of conquest.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 13:56:17 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814543176597505

  • How is @mayoroflondon not a Jihadi Collaborator?

    How is @mayoroflondon not a Jihadi Collaborator?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 13:55:15 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/872814280529387521

  • ANY LAW THAT IS OPEN TO INTERPRETATION LICENSES INTERPRETATIONS (the koran licen

    ANY LAW THAT IS OPEN TO INTERPRETATION LICENSES INTERPRETATIONS

    (the koran licenses terrorists)

    Christians and Jews went through the enlightenment and the reformation, and the legal and scientific revolutions. The evil in the west has been caused by the re-introduction of abrahamism (christianity, judaism, and islam) in the forms of Jewish Marxism, and French Postmodernism, and less so by Anglo Egalitarianism. And now we’re dealing with the only people who have failed to go through the enlightenment, and historicize, rationalize, and legalize their customs.

    So the point I’m making is that if you DON’T convert the Koran into uninterpretable (Decidable) propositions, then DE FACTO, all interpretation of the Koran IS IN FACT licensed by the Book, the religion, and all muslims.

    In other words, the jihadis and terrorists are in fact practicing Islam because it is possible to interpret islam from the book as such, because the inability to interpret islam in that way is not restated in a new version of the Book.

    And my argument is, that if it was restated, then it would be untenable for western authors.

    Which is why I suspect western authors will, as some of them have begun to, state the Koran in legal verse.

    We know that the book is a fabrication just as was the Jewish Bible, and the Christian Bible. We know the Koran was only Codified a century ago. We have begun producing an historical literature demonstrating that Mohammed is no more real a character than Jesus, Arthur, or Siegfried.

    We have not however converted it to a set of statements of law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 12:16:00 UTC

  • WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE

    WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE STATEMENTS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION?

    If the Koran can be converted to law – a sequence of operationally testable statements, as has all of christendom then why has it not been?

    If the koran can be converted into law so that it cannot be interpreted, why has it not been? To preserve interpretation rather than decidability?

    If the koran can be interpreted, then how can anyone claim it is law?

    Laws are decidable. Opinions are not. Until you can reduce literature to laws that are decidable, then one has no claim other than that all DEDUCTIONS FROM IT are in fact REPRESENTATIVE OF IT.

    In other words, if you can’t DECIDE because of operationally testable statements, then the DECISION is to leave open interpretation. Therefore the decision is to leave open interpretation, and justification of it is just making excuses for licensing interpretation.

    Therefore all actions derived from interpretation are the result of the decision NOT to eradicate interpretation.

    In other words, jihadists, in all their flavors, and islamists in all their flavors, are specifically licensed by all other muslims because they have not DENIED them the ability to interpret the Koran, by stating the Koran in decidable verse: a sequence of operationally testable statements.

    In other words, muslims accommodate terrorist ideologies by not regulating their religion such that it is FREE of terrorist ideologies.

    Jews and Christians have both historicized and legalized their literature. Islam has NOT historicized and legalized its literature, and resists it at every opportunity.

    With every denial we see only confirmation: islam licenses jihadis, terrorism, and interpretation.

    The truth is,that the Koran *CAN* be converted into law.

    At which point it will be untenable.

    Which is why it has not been done.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 11:41:00 UTC

  • FIRST QUARTER SURPRISE WAS AGENCY That was the last piece of the puzzle. Markets

    FIRST QUARTER SURPRISE WAS AGENCY

    That was the last piece of the puzzle. Markets evolve agency.

    The rest has been largely work on religion – and the battle of the east and west against the steppe and desert peoples who were unsuccessful at transitioning to farming and developing farmer genes and farmer ethics and farmer cultures.

    At present I’m doing pretty well on the core of the book. Lets see how well I do this time. So far, no roadblocks. No “dammit, I have to solve that now.”

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 09:14:00 UTC

  • LITERATURE AND LAW ARE ENOUGH: (DEVOTEES OF THE CULTS OF IDEALISM, SUPERNATURALI

    LITERATURE AND LAW ARE ENOUGH: (DEVOTEES OF THE CULTS OF IDEALISM, SUPERNATURALISM AND SUPERNORMALISM.)

    The via positiva myth and literature, via negativa law.

    You want to achieve good, and I want to achieve the eradication of the false and the bad.

    You want to achieve consensus on the good, and I want to eliminate consensus on the false and the bad, by providing incentives to prosecute the false and the bad, even if some well meaning fools think it is a good.

    You want to find a means of education, and I want to find a means of conflict resolution.

    You want to find a means of INDOCTRINATION of a monopoly and I want to find a means of REGULATION a market, without the need for indoctrination, so that people can develop whatever good and true narratives they desire, as long as they are not bad.

    You want to do something expensive: education, and I want to do something cheap: law.

    You want to do something that provides people with opportunities, and I want to do something that deprives them of opportunities.

    You want something that you can convince people of, and I want something that they needn’t be.

    Science (measurement and decidability) can only exist as a via-negativa process (eliminating of ignorance, error, bias, and deceit), but it requires a great deal of knowledge to employ – principally because it is impossible to attach values to statements.

    While it is something quite different to teach and rally, and much easier to rely upon fictionalisms, idealisms, myths, narratives, that contain more experiential information so that values can be attached to statements.

    In other words, it is very hard to load, frame, and suggest using science and law, and it is very easy to load, frame, and suggest using narratives.

    And my position is, that if we deny people fictionalisms and idealisms, that have sufficient Supernormalism in myth, heroes, and histories, that the lies of Supernaturalism, Idealism, conflationism, need not be employed in education and communication, any more than they need be employed in any other aspect of life.

    Or at least, those ‘techniques’ produce externalities that are demonstrably harmful as hell, and that such people employing such techniques may have no dominion over others in the construction of commons, legislation, and law.

    Ying and Yang was a prison. Good and Evil a prison. Deflationary Truth and Falsehood the method of transcendence.

    And as far as I know, Literature and Law are all that is necessary for pedagogy. It is that people who have learned to ‘lie’ by idealism and supernaturalism are unable to exit the programming of the cults just as those who argue by theological means are unable to exit the programming of the cult.

    We can exit falsehood. Literature and history make no claims of the ideal the supernatural, albeit they educate us through supernormalism (hyperbole).

    -Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-08 08:55:00 UTC