Theme: Religion

  • The Oath of Transcendent Man

    A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan. I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian. I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan. I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior. As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man. And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Sovereignty The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Oath of Transcendent Man

    A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends. As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan. I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian. I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan. I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations. As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior. As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man. And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men. Curt Doolittle The Cult of Sovereignty The Philosophy of Aristocracy The Natural Law of Reciprocity The Propertarian Institute, Kiev, Ukraine

  • THE PROPERTIES OF RELIGIONS SATISFY A SET OF NECESSARY DEMANDS Most people don’t

    THE PROPERTIES OF RELIGIONS SATISFY A SET OF NECESSARY DEMANDS

    Most people don’t understand the term religion because they define religion as monotheism and supernaturalism rather than the demands of the human psyche once outside of tribal life, that are satisfied by religion – rituals and regularities that provide the kind of saturation that tribal life provides the always-uncertain-mind.

    The tribal mind is constantly receiving feedback from other members in the group. But as scale and division of labor increase this turns into ‘noise’. Because it is noise it is incalculable (impossible to order and rationalize). Because it is incalculable it creates uncertainty and frustration. Uncertainty and frustration that for a time can be satisfied by increased consumption provided by increases in the division of knowledge and labor. But eventually ends on confusion and loneliness (or what marx called ‘alienation’).

    Gods, demigods, saints, and heroes provide a unit of measure by which complex sets of phenomenon can be judged across family, clan, tribe, and cultural lines. They provide decidability and therefore the reduction of conflict, a standard of norms, and the production of trust and certainty through repetition, and the elimination of effort of game-theoriizing which failed the human mind by the second or third order.

    Sports, Festivals, Holidays, Feasts and Rituals provide trust by evoking the pack response which is one of the most pleasant feelings humans can experience. Repetition eliminates differences. Costly rituals eliminate defection (loss avoidance).

    Private rituals and prayers and recitation and meditation provide mindfulness.

    So at every level, political, social, and personal, that which we call ‘religion’ creates the equivalent of the pack at increasingly large scales.

    And humans like all pack and herd animals, are gregarious toward the pack.

    And that is the purpose of religion.

    To create gregariousness toward the pack.

    And therefore a forgiving and tolerant and gregarious pack despite our ever increasing differences in a division of knowledge and labor.

    In propertarian terms: to decrease opportunity and transaction costs including the physical, emotional, and intellectual.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 17:27:00 UTC

  • Buddhism is a made up religion. Judaism is a made up religion. Christianity is a

    Buddhism is a made up religion.

    Judaism is a made up religion.

    Christianity is a made up religion.

    Islam is a made up religion.

    Protestantism is a made up religion.

    The church of england is a made up religion.

    Quakerism is a made up religion.

    Amish is a made up religion

    Mormonism is a made up religion.

    Scientology is a made up religion.

    Current evangelical protestantism is a made up religion.

    Postmodernism (democratic socialist secular humanist femnism, and the charter for human rights) is a made up religion.

    Arguably the Church of Ted is a made up religion.

    Every religion is made up. The problem isn’t making it up.

    ITS FULFILLING A MARKET DEMAND

    WHAT DOES THE MARKET DEMONSTRATE DEMAND FOR?

    And how do you fund it?


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 16:21:00 UTC

  • THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IS DEAD – AND A COLLABORATOR The catholic church is dead. S

    THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH IS DEAD – AND A COLLABORATOR

    The catholic church is dead. She abandoned us. Our people have abandoned her.

    The protestant church has reverted to jewish sect. The puritans have become but jews.

    There has been no Augustine to save the church this time. There is no Enlightenment romantic attachment to defend her failures.

    She is now but a wing of the Abrahamists, Marxists, Socialists, Postmodernists, and Feminists.

    For the conquest by Byzantines against the West alone we should end her.

    For the destruction of Stoicism, Philosophy, and science alone we should end her.

    For the indoctrination of our people into Abrahamic lies alone we should end her.

    For the desecration of our sacred groves, holidays, festivals, alone we should end her.

    For the preservation of the ignorance of our people in illiteracy alone we should end her.

    For the destruction of the templars alone we should end her.

    For the failure to reform in response to the enlightenment we should end her.

    For the collaboration with the marxists, socialists, postmodernists and feminists, we should end her.

    For her collaboration with the islamists we should end her.

    We need no lies. We have become the gods of old. We need only contemplate and celebrate their and our achievements.

    The solution is a new religion from the old, free of abrahamism, and free of lies.

    And the financing and incentives to make it happen.

    And to retain the rituals with different parables, different readings, different histories, and a different oath.

    And thankfully, that is something that can be done….


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 14:55:00 UTC

  • A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT I am a pagan if 1)

    A PAGAN, A CHRISTIAN, AN ARYAN, A WARRIOR, A MAN TRANSCENDENT

    I am a pagan if 1) I accept the laws of nature as binding on all of existence; and 2) if I treat nature as sacred and to be contemplated, protected and improved; and 3) I treat the world as something to transform closer to an Eden in whatever ways I can before I die; and 4) if I deny the existence of a supreme being with dominion over the physical laws, and treat all gods, demigods, heroes, saints, figures of history, and ancestors as characters with whom I may speak to in private contemplation in the hope of gaining wisdom and synchronicity from having done so. And 5) if I participate with others of my society in repetition of oaths, repetition of myths, repetition of festivals, repetition of holidays, and the perpetuation of all of the above to my offspring. And 6) if I leave open that synchronicity appears to exist now and then, and that it may be possible that there is a scientific explanation for it, other than just humans subject to similar stimuli producing similar intuitions and therefore similar ends.

    As far as I know this is all that is required of me to be a Pagan.

    I am a christian if I have adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive forgiveness before punishment, enserfment, enslavement, death, or war.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Christian.

    I am an Aryan if 1) I proudly display my excellences so that others seek to achieve or exceed them; 2) I seek competition to constantly test and improve myself so I do not weaken; 3) I swear to speak no insult and demand it; 4) I speak the truth and demand it; 5) I take nothing not paid for and demand it; 6) I grant sovereignty to my kin and demand it; 7) I insure my people regardless of condition, and demand it; and in doing so leave nothing but voluntary markets of cooperation between sovereign men; and to discipline, enserf, enslave, ostracize or kill those who do otherwise; 8) to not show fear or cowardice, abandon my brothers, or retreat, and 9) to die a good death in the service of my kin, my clan, my tribe and my people.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be an Aryan.

    I am a warrior in that 1) we will prepare for war so perfectly that none dare enter it against us. 2) Once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, with eagerness, and with passion, and without mercy, without constraint, and without remorse; And 3) before ending war, we shall defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of our enemy, and the memory of the slaughter lives a hundred generations.

    As far as I know, this is all that is required of me to be a Warrior.

    As far as I know, if I succeed as a Pagan, as a Christian, as an Aryan, as a Warrior, then I have transcended the animal man, and earned my place among the saints, heroes, demigods, gods, in the memories, histories, and legends of man.

    And that is the objective of heroes. We leave the rest for ordinary men.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Cult of Sovereignty

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Natural Law of Reciprocity

    The Propertarian Institute,

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 14:03:00 UTC

  • DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT) For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceiv

    DEI VOLUNT!!!! (THE GODS WILL IT)

    For pagans rising above their abrahamic deceivers, it’s “DEI VOLUNT”: “The Gods Will It”, not “Deus Vult”: “God Wills It”.

    😉


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:57:00 UTC

  • WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE? It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio

    WHAT ANSWER DOES THE RIGHT HAVE?

    It’s not exactly like the Right has a portfolio of philosophers to choose from. Who is there? A bunch of failures who took stylistic clues from christian literature and mixed it with Lovecraft’s occultism? A century and a half of Abrahamic apologists still hopeful that what defeated us in the previous era, what we escaped from, and what the Abrahamists are using to attack us once again, will somehow – like generals fighting the last war – succeed this time despite failing us over and over again in the past?

    What strategy? What plan? What demands? What institutions? What will you change as meaningfully as what rescued us from Supernatural Abrahamism the last time (empiricism) and what can rescue us from SuperRational and Pseudoscientific Abrahamism this time (marxism/socialism/postmodernism/feminism)?

    What military tactics that were required in the age of arrows, in the age of cannon, in the age of rifles, in the age of armor, are now possible and necessary in the current age under the ending of the peace of westphalia where the fragility is not the army, but the infrastructure, and the illusion of power and rule? By what means can the people overthrow the state and restore nation and sovereignty and militia?

    If you are weak. I understand. But you are irrelevant. All that matters is a solution that it is possible to implement, a set of incentives by which to award the common people for changing the status quo, a set of demands to impose upon the state, a strategy for forcing their submission, command and control by which to act, and a minority of men ready to destroy that upon which the current order depends.

    Does anyone out there have anything other, than cunning words?

    No. I know so. Don’t bother pulling wishful thinking out of your backside.

    Rule or be ruled. Rule by force or be ruled by force. Rule by distributed dictatorship of the militia of sovereign men, denying rule to all others. Or be ruled by any one of the alternatives, all of which render you a freeman, serf or slave.

    The strong do not look for approval, permission, or cooperation of the weak. We act, regardless of the approval, or permission, or cooperation of the weak.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 12:54:00 UTC

  • I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE. SORRY. IN THAT SENSE I AM A CHRISTIAN. My point is, don’

    I DON’T HATE ON PEOPLE. SORRY. IN THAT SENSE I AM A CHRISTIAN.

    My point is, don’t criticize or counter-signal me because I don’t climb on the racist bandwagon; because I counter-signal demands that I join the racist bandwagon. And i counter-signal the use of my work for the purpose of advocating racism.

    I don’t hate on people. I hate on ideas. I may hate on some genes. I may hate a bit on nature once in awhile. But I don’t hate on people because of their race. Their strategy, their government, their culture, their beliefs, and their actions.

    I am a christian to the extent that I have understood and adopted the teaching of christianity: 1) the eradication of hatred from the human heart. 2) the extension of kinship love to non-kin. 3) the extension of exhaustive tit-for-tat before going to war. And 4) I retain the Aryan conviction that once we go to war, we do so with *joy*, and without mercy, without constraint, without remorse – defeat an enemy completely such that no other dares a condition of your enemy.

    I understand all people must follow our reproductive incentives. We have no other rational means of choice. But I try to solve the underlying problem. The underlying problem is DC/NY imperialism, a demographic government, abrahamism/marxism/postmodernism, and most of all, the lack of rule of law by the natural law of reciprocity, and the perpetual militia necessary to preserve it.

    I want EVERYONE to be free to form nations that produce the commons they NEED for their state of genetic development, and their distribution of abilities.

    And I want everyone to be accountable for the domestication of their own people rather than offloading that cost onto others (especially us).

    And if I don’t join on the “LET’S FAIL AGAIN PLEASE” bandwagon of promoting fictionalism in order to compensate for the remaining inferiority of the distribution of my own ‘white’ kin, then, understand, that’s OK with me. I’m not after the attention of the common man. I’m after creating an answer to the Frankfurt School – this time via truth, that prevents all further abrahamic deceptions. And then using small numbers to start a revolution that will spiral – not from understanding of my arguments, but from opportunity to obtain what they desire. And I hope most of all to use the very threat and possibility of it, to cause serious conversation about the restoration of natural law and markets in everything through the restoration of reciprocity and truthful speech.

    If you want to “FAIL AGAIN PLEASE” then you’re welcome to. Some of us favor voluntary religion (fictionalism) and some of us favor involuntary law (truth). We all pursue those actions within our realm of comprehension and ability. The common man is not my audience or my objective. A few angry men that need an organization to assist them is.

    I know that I can produce weapons that few can make use of. Others can adopt for their use. And others adopt from those adoptions. I have said all along that this is my strategy. It has been since I went public.

    I’m going to end abrahamism forever. And that means ending fictionalism forever. And that means ONLY THE SMART AND THE STRONG WILL RULE.

    And that is what I’m aiming for.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Philosophy of Aristocracy

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine


    Source date (UTC): 2017-06-09 11:28:00 UTC

  • Why Is The Koran Open To Interpretation?

    WHY HAS THE KORAN NOT BEEN CONVERTED INTO HISTORICAL AND LEGAL VERSE – TESTABLE STATEMENTS NOT OPEN TO INTERPRETATION? If the Koran can be converted to law – a sequence of operationally testable statements, as has all of christendom then why has it not been? If the koran can be converted into law so that it cannot be interpreted, why has it not been? To preserve interpretation rather than decidability?

    If the koran can be interpreted, then how can anyone claim it is law? Laws are decidable. Opinions are not. Until you can reduce literature to laws that are decidable, then one has no claim other than that all DEDUCTIONS FROM IT are in fact REPRESENTATIVE OF IT. In other words, if you can’t DECIDE because of operationally testable statements, then the DECISION is to leave open interpretation. Therefore the decision is to leave open interpretation, and justification of it is just making excuses for licensing interpretation. Therefore all actions derived from interpretation are the result of the decision NOT to eradicate interpretation. In other words, jihadists, in all their flavors, and islamists in all their flavors, are specifically licensed by all other muslims because they have not DENIED them the ability to interpret the Koran, by stating the Koran in decidable verse: a sequence of operationally testable statements. In other words, muslims accommodate terrorist ideologies by not regulating their religion such that it is FREE of terrorist ideologies. Jews and Christians have both historicized and legalized their literature. Islam has NOT historicized and legalized its literature, and resists it at every opportunity. With every denial we see only confirmation: islam licenses jihadis, terrorism, and interpretation. The truth is,that the Koran *CAN* be converted into law. At which point it will be untenable. Which is why it has not been done.