—“Most people won’t understand the basis for [the Propertarian] legal theory, and it will need explanation in mythological terms. To the people who require this form of explanation it will essentially be a religion.”– Eric Orwoll You know, sometimes you just need someone to reframe it for you. Thanks Eric. That’s smart. You could ahve told me that three years ago and saved me six months… lol
Theme: Religion
-
Abrahamism: The Religions of The Enemy.
by Alex Macleod –“You cannot have an enemy be the core of your culture.”– To put it very simplistically isn’t that what Judaism (goyim), Mohamedism (unbelievers) and Christianity (the devil) have? (Curt: Exactly. The abrahamic religions are the semitic pastoralist revolt against the agrarian metal workers. Thus explains the invention of organized religion as a resistance movement against transcendence [property].)
-
Abrahamism: The Religions of The Enemy.
by Alex Macleod –“You cannot have an enemy be the core of your culture.”– To put it very simplistically isn’t that what Judaism (goyim), Mohamedism (unbelievers) and Christianity (the devil) have? (Curt: Exactly. The abrahamic religions are the semitic pastoralist revolt against the agrarian metal workers. Thus explains the invention of organized religion as a resistance movement against transcendence [property].)
-
Progressivism Is a Religion, and Truth Blasphemy
by Vivek Na Liberals use this kind of rhetoric – “no right thinking individual would say that”. Or “That doesn’t sound right” – meaning you’re committing blasphemy according to their constructed sense of right and wrong, ergo, you’re a heretic who should be metaphorically exiled or pilloried. –Curt:– You know, we ought to use that more often: “So you mean it’s blasphemous in your religion, right?”
-
Progressivism Is a Religion, and Truth Blasphemy
by Vivek Na Liberals use this kind of rhetoric – “no right thinking individual would say that”. Or “That doesn’t sound right” – meaning you’re committing blasphemy according to their constructed sense of right and wrong, ergo, you’re a heretic who should be metaphorically exiled or pilloried. –Curt:– You know, we ought to use that more often: “So you mean it’s blasphemous in your religion, right?”
-
“A religion that doesnt “ought” and “oughtnt” isn’t a religion”—Vivek Na —“A
—“A religion that doesnt “ought” and “oughtnt” isn’t a religion”—Vivek Na
—“A religion that does “is” and “isn’t” isn’t a religion.”— 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 15:30:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1005834474528141314
-
THE LAW ALLOWS US TO CREATE RELIGIONS THAT ARE NOT FALSE —“Humans really don’t
THE LAW ALLOWS US TO CREATE RELIGIONS THAT ARE NOT FALSE
—“Humans really don’t live day to day in the “conscious” “rational” mode, you know this but it seems you unconsciously push against this fact.”— SG Simmons
Because religions are relativistic and truth absolute.
As such in matters of conflict, the truth and the law, supercede religion – for the simple reason that they do in fact supercede it.
For some reason it is inconceivable to people that we can create religions (as the stoics tried to, as buddha tried to, and the japanese do) that are in fact, not false.
But this is why I have to work on this problem so hard. And why law is so important. So that we can end the undecidability of religions and produce one that is decidable.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 12:38:00 UTC
-
PROGRESSIVISM IS A RELIGION, AND TRUTH BLASPHEMY by Vivek Na Liberals use this k
PROGRESSIVISM IS A RELIGION, AND TRUTH BLASPHEMY
by Vivek Na
Liberals use this kind of rhetoric – “no right thinking individual would say that”. Or “That doesn’t sound right” – meaning you’re committing blasphemy according to their constructed sense of right and wrong, ergo, you’re a heretic who should be metaphorically exiled or pilloried.
–Curt:–
You know, we ought to use that more often: “So you mean it’s blasphemous in your religion, right?”
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:44:00 UTC
-
“A religion that doesnt “ought” and “oughtnt” isn’t a religion”—Vivek Na —“A
—“A religion that doesnt “ought” and “oughtnt” isn’t a religion”—Vivek Na
—“A religion that does “is” and “isn’t” isn’t a religion.”— 😉
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 11:29:00 UTC
-
ABRAHAMISM: THE RELIGIONS OF THE ENEMY. by Alex Macleod –“You cannot have an en
ABRAHAMISM: THE RELIGIONS OF THE ENEMY.
by Alex Macleod
–“You cannot have an enemy be the core of your culture.”–
To put it very simplistically isn’t that what Judaism (goyim), Mohamedism (unbelievers) and Christianity (the devil) have?
(Curt: Exactly. The abrahamic religions are the semitic pastoralist revolt against the agrarian metal workers. Thus explains the invention of organized religion as a resistance movement against transcendence [property].)
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 10:01:00 UTC