Christianity does in fact produce mindfulness – as does and must, any religion. And mindfulness does in fact produce agency. The question is whether we can produce the same mindfulness but far greater agency if we retain the scientific (secular) content of the religion, reform the history, reform the lessons, reform the oath, and sacrifice/feast.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 09:50:00 UTC
—“It is more fun, and more reliable to slaughter other peoples sacred cows. But, tis best not to expect others to kill their own, at least not without assistance.”—Neil A. Bucklew
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-12 02:03:23 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1006356255177310209
MORE ON THE ESOTERIC, OCCULT, AND LITERARY AND A REQUEST THAT MEN FACE THEIR LACK OF AGENCY AS INDIVIDUALS
How do I make clear that one does not argue with the fulfilling (wisdom lit) but with the truth (science)? Well that’s what I try to do.
I have had to continuously counter-signal attacks against my work for not providing a lower agency, more accessible version of the natural law. THERE ISN”T ONE. Man can be lifted to it by constructing his agency, but it cannot be lowered for those lacking it.
And yes it is lower agency to need literature because it relies on appeal to intuition and does not consist of a continuous stream of constant relations between reality and decision.
But that does not mean that when one possesses lower agency one cannot still live a fulfilling life. It means that literary argument is analogy and wisdom helpful in choice of preference and good – and perhaps even understanding. It can in fact function as sedation. Or even inspiration. Inspiration necessary because of a lack of membership in teams granting one agency.
I would read the lord of the rings, and dune, and Neuromancer to envision possibilities, and in fact, most history to gain wisdom. I can understand reading the essays of wise men (particularly Montaigne and Chesterton). But these are vehicles for understanding. Not for argument and decision. Any more than religion and rationalism are means of arguing for truth.
IT IS QUITE HARD TO LACK AGENCY AS A YOUNG MAN. As such i’m criticizing the lack of organizations for MEN. But I undrestand the struggle of being an individual young male, particularly in modernity. It’s alienating.
Literature is a substitute for membership in a group with which one obtains agency. Individualism is the necessary subject of the Law – all else requires guilds, teams, militias, armies, and governments: NUMBERS.
Again… esotericism is escapist literature for those with low agency, and I’m absolutely positive if I spent 25k for an academic and his grad students to do the research it would come out as the same. Esotericism is simply another secular religion. And literature is between wisdom literature, secular theology, entertainment, and escapism.
So it’s ok to criticize and I understand the market need exists. But I am not trying to fill that market need by DEGREDATION but by transcendence of the male into that which he longs for by EXISTENTIAL rather than fantasy means.
And if not, then all that matters is that a small percentage of the population of choose agency, action, and transformation of the real world, as an army, rather than literary sedation, as an individual.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 22:00:00 UTC
IS NATURAL LAW A CULT?
(Literally, the one ‘true’ religion?)
—“Propertarianism and Testimonialism are made up religions.”— Joseph Kane
Um…. Testiness aside… You might argue that putting the Natural Law of reciprocity of Sovereign Men above all other considerations is just science, or you might say that choosing that science is equivalent to a religion. I wouldn’t disagree with you too much if you cast it as a religion.
– It provides an ultimate goal (transcendence),
– It provides a group evolutionary strategy (rapid adaptations through markets),
– It provides a moral ethical, and legal code (reciprocity),
– It puts limits on the actions of government,
– it requires a continuously born cost of truth telling, an oath, and the ritual of oath taking, the practice of military rituals and feasts.
– And for the western people, our history provides a non-false mythos of continuous success at the transformation of self and man into gods.
So as such *it would be one one true religion* for the simple reason that it would be the one religion without falsehood.
The Cult of The Law is the Religion of Men As Gods.
Curt Doolittle
The Propertarian Institute
Kiev, Ukraine.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 21:34:00 UTC
CHRISTIANITY AND THE WILL TO POWER
by Jeff Urizen
As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man.
When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion.
Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will.
Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World.
This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world.
Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey.
The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base.
The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets.
Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this.
Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.As Nietzsche correctly stated, this world is the will to power, and I’d add, it’s a will to power over the physical world. Pagan religion was merely an expression of how much control nature in its rawest Form had over man.
When man began to master over nature he developed a man centered religion.
Our will to power is controlled by hormones in our brain. When we rise up in power we get a serotonin boost. When we want to avoid falling back down the Hierarchy we experience disgust. Disgust sensitivity is the tool we evolved to rise up in power. Christian disgust was an attempt, an altruistic attempt, to forcefully raise the people up the dominance Hierarchy to better rule over the other subspecies and races. It gabe a strategic advantage. Christian disgust is just the human response to being around that which you perceive as being less powerful and more under the control of nature and not your own will.
Christianity then reached its zenith and gave birth to the next phase of our ascendence into power which is liberalism, being free of all consequences, free of the limitations of truth, free of the limitations of definitions, completely free of responsibility to the material World.
This phase is a divine phase and that is why liberals rightly defend their religion by being disgusted by race and nations, which are seen as merely limitations and thus restrictions on man’s quest to dominate the limitations placed on him by the physical world.
Liberalism isn’t degenerate, it is the removal of obligations so that the genes can search for new areas of Conquest without the limitations that the obligation of reproduction would place on them. The right side of the brain detects and defends against predators while the left side of the brain searches for prey.
The left is not meant to defend it is is meant to Conquer and so you can’t hate the left for being what they are because essentially they are like Christ, childless martyrs of the pursuit of knowledge of the father, the field, the universe. The right isn’t the enemy either, it must defend its genetic base and must insist that all others do the same so that the most fit genes can ascend, and so the right must prevent all attempts to ascend the Hierarchy which are not based strictly on merit or which come at the cost of the genetic base.
The next logical step in this ascendancy is to enter a synthetic stage where we either become robot consciousness or we become a new species that feeds on all those below it. The elite become a new race unidentifiable to the race of the public, and we become their pets as their favorite past time while they search for the next physical limitation to transcend which is the earths biosphere, and our next goal is to inhabit other planets.
Genes exist to replicate and thus they will subjugate and stand upon all that which prevents this.
Preservation of a race is merely a safety mechanism, a security blanket, allowing the higher orders to take risks and offset losses on the people, and therefore all the left and the right are serving in their divine purpose and pursuit of divinity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 12:47:00 UTC
RELIGION IS A SUBSTITUTE FOR THE MILITIA
As far as I know the criteria for a cult (religion) is that one take oath to a falsehood in exchange for group membership, group limitation on political coercion, and group emotional insurance, and the promise of some future (utopian) good.
As far as I know, taking an oath to sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty for the promise of continuous goods and future transcendence for the self, kin, nation, and mankind is not a falsehood.
As far as I know the militia and the polity, under sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty provide all those insurances.
As far as I know the an oath of reciprocity requires nor tolerates a falsehood.
The difference is we pay real costs for the militia, sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, and duty, and we pay no costs for the other than recitation of falsehoods for cults and religions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-11 12:39:00 UTC
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:18:00 UTC
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/06/10/erdogan-predicts-war-between-the-cross-and-crescent-over-austria-mosque-closures/
Source date (UTC): 2018-06-10 22:18:00 UTC
Moritz brings up yet again that many young men want a new religion. And their criteria for a philosophy, is simply an inspirational theology. And I’m fully aware of this criticism. Propertarianism is structured as a philosophy out of utility – the utility of falsifying rationalist philosophy. But what I’m writing is LAW. Uniting science (physics, economics, sociology, psychology, metaphysics), and law into a single commensurable language across all disciplines providing a means by which we can suppress falsehoods, and particularly the abrahamic falsehoods (pilpul/critique) and the modern versions of them (postmodernism/marxism). And with that law providing a constitution that makes it possible to restore the specific uniqueness of the west, and our ability to drag ourselves, and humanity, kicking and screaming into transcendence: evolutionary progress. There is no reason for you to like the law. On the explanatory power and commensurability and decidability it provides. It slaughters all your sacred cows. But then again, why do you need falsehoods? My position is that the weak of body, spirit, and mind, need them and the strong of body, spirit, and mind do not. Those who are weak will never judge, never govern, never rule. They are only important in that they will fight for the material incentives provided by defeat of the parasites and the rescue of our civilization – or not. Very few of us our needed. The weak can stay home. Meaning – if you need a cult, you and your genes are a part of the problem, and of no value to the solution. The meek won’t inherit the earth. They will only live with the permissions give to them by those that do.
Moritz brings up yet again that many young men want a new religion. And their criteria for a philosophy, is simply an inspirational theology. And I’m fully aware of this criticism. Propertarianism is structured as a philosophy out of utility – the utility of falsifying rationalist philosophy. But what I’m writing is LAW. Uniting science (physics, economics, sociology, psychology, metaphysics), and law into a single commensurable language across all disciplines providing a means by which we can suppress falsehoods, and particularly the abrahamic falsehoods (pilpul/critique) and the modern versions of them (postmodernism/marxism). And with that law providing a constitution that makes it possible to restore the specific uniqueness of the west, and our ability to drag ourselves, and humanity, kicking and screaming into transcendence: evolutionary progress. There is no reason for you to like the law. On the explanatory power and commensurability and decidability it provides. It slaughters all your sacred cows. But then again, why do you need falsehoods? My position is that the weak of body, spirit, and mind, need them and the strong of body, spirit, and mind do not. Those who are weak will never judge, never govern, never rule. They are only important in that they will fight for the material incentives provided by defeat of the parasites and the rescue of our civilization – or not. Very few of us our needed. The weak can stay home. Meaning – if you need a cult, you and your genes are a part of the problem, and of no value to the solution. The meek won’t inherit the earth. They will only live with the permissions give to them by those that do.