Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reform

  • I dont go there. I look for answers. The answer is obvious. We just need to stop

    I dont go there. I look for answers. The answer is obvious.
    We just need to stop with postwar ideology of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism, political correctness, and face-over-truth. When the secret of western civ is truth-over-face and mkt eugenics.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 20:12:18 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267549555782025219

    Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267548777851781122

  • I’ve been patient enough. Y’all have asked me to step up. I don’t really want to

    I’ve been patient enough.
    Y’all have asked me to step up.
    I don’t really want to. But some will have to.

    Thankfully the constitutional reforms are just about ready.
    Any day now.

    Reply addressees: @BillHess78 @realDonaldTrump

  • I’ve been patient enough. Y’all have asked me to step up. I don’t really want to

    I’ve been patient enough.
    Y’all have asked me to step up.
    I don’t really want to. But some will have to.

    Thankfully the constitutional reforms are just about ready.
    Any day now.

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 19:56:42 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267545630379048960

    Reply addressees: @BillHess78 @realDonaldTrump

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267544042814017543

  • Ambitions

    “…The constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states….”

    Oct 19, 2019, 3:42 PM

    —“I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states, and to the adjudication of differences in material property between the states, and where hostile cities are involuntarily converted to city states, and where all local norm, custom, and tradition is determined by at the local level, and only investment at the state. … And I absolutely positively without question know how to do it – because the alternative for the “Left” is so terrible they will agree rather than risk it. That is why have confidence – I am very slow and deliberate and thorough, but I am very, very, good at what I do. It will take 1/3 of 1% of our males to make it happen, and it will happen quickly. And frankly we will hope the enemy resists – because “—

  • Ambitions

    “…The constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states….”

    Oct 19, 2019, 3:42 PM

    —“I think only that the constitution and the law can be restored to pre-postmodern, pre-marxist, pre-civil war terms, as a federal government limited to the defense of the states, and to the adjudication of differences in material property between the states, and where hostile cities are involuntarily converted to city states, and where all local norm, custom, and tradition is determined by at the local level, and only investment at the state. … And I absolutely positively without question know how to do it – because the alternative for the “Left” is so terrible they will agree rather than risk it. That is why have confidence – I am very slow and deliberate and thorough, but I am very, very, good at what I do. It will take 1/3 of 1% of our males to make it happen, and it will happen quickly. And frankly we will hope the enemy resists – because “—

  • P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms

    P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms. https://t.co/dhenTx9MZZ

  • P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms

    P Is a Reform on The Scale of The Roman Reforms. https://propertarianism.com/2020/06/01/p-is-a-reform-on-the-scale-of-the-roman-reforms/

    Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 18:31:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267524178263056384

  • Disambiguating P for Mass Consumption?

      How do we disambiguate P-Method, P-Law, and a P-Constitution Template, and P-Constitutions for Each Polity?

    1. The system of thought we call propertarianism – that would be better called ‘natural law’ or ‘Testmonialism’ – is a methodology that completes the sciences by completing the transformation of traditional philosophical categories of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and aesthetics as well as the pseudo-sciences of psychology, sociology, and political science into a single science with a uniform fully commensurable operational vocabulary and logic. Where “Operational” might be better stated in philosophical terms “realism, naturalism, operationalism (human actions).

    2. With this uniformity provides the ability to write constitution and law in value-neutral prose fully commensurable across all peoples, all, disciplines and all contexts.

    3. We can write any constitution for any people using any group strategy in this P-law – as long as we state it under realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, and reciprocity – where reciprocity includes testimonial speech.

    4. The only unique properties of a P-law constitution are (a) the suppression of false and ir-reciprocal speech, (b) operational and technical language that prohibits misinterpretation, interpretation, and arbitrary extension.

    5. Using P-method, and P-law, I wrote the The P-consitution as a template for a flexible government that varies from authoritarian to market to redistributive dependent upon circumstances that create demand for different government, and it includes a set of options for government from authoritarian or authoritarian monarchy to multi-house social democracy, and everything in between.

    6. The P-Constitution for the USA is tailored for the problems of the Anglo Civilization (UK, USA, Canada, and Australia-NZ), and I would need to tailor one for western Europe, eastern europe (Intermarium), and one for Russia. But it’s possible to write one for any and every civilization in entirely truthful terms – and there is little reason to do otherwise, since each civilization survives by competing on its terms, and its terms can be stated truthfully (realism, naturalism, operationalism, testimonialism).

  • Disambiguating P for Mass Consumption?

      How do we disambiguate P-Method, P-Law, and a P-Constitution Template, and P-Constitutions for Each Polity?

    1. The system of thought we call propertarianism – that would be better called ‘natural law’ or ‘Testmonialism’ – is a methodology that completes the sciences by completing the transformation of traditional philosophical categories of metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, politics, and aesthetics as well as the pseudo-sciences of psychology, sociology, and political science into a single science with a uniform fully commensurable operational vocabulary and logic. Where “Operational” might be better stated in philosophical terms “realism, naturalism, operationalism (human actions).

    2. With this uniformity provides the ability to write constitution and law in value-neutral prose fully commensurable across all peoples, all, disciplines and all contexts.

    3. We can write any constitution for any people using any group strategy in this P-law – as long as we state it under realism, naturalism, operationalism, sovereignty, and reciprocity – where reciprocity includes testimonial speech.

    4. The only unique properties of a P-law constitution are (a) the suppression of false and ir-reciprocal speech, (b) operational and technical language that prohibits misinterpretation, interpretation, and arbitrary extension.

    5. Using P-method, and P-law, I wrote the The P-consitution as a template for a flexible government that varies from authoritarian to market to redistributive dependent upon circumstances that create demand for different government, and it includes a set of options for government from authoritarian or authoritarian monarchy to multi-house social democracy, and everything in between.

    6. The P-Constitution for the USA is tailored for the problems of the Anglo Civilization (UK, USA, Canada, and Australia-NZ), and I would need to tailor one for western Europe, eastern europe (Intermarium), and one for Russia. But it’s possible to write one for any and every civilization in entirely truthful terms – and there is little reason to do otherwise, since each civilization survives by competing on its terms, and its terms can be stated truthfully (realism, naturalism, operationalism, testimonialism).

  • If You Want to Learn P

      Propertarianism is like Aristotelianism – it is a huge project that reforms much human thought especially logic, language, epistemology (knowledge), psychology, sociology, ethics, law, and politics.

    1. You can learn about our proposed constitution and it’s policies (it’s a lot, and you might have to learn a bit bout economics and the justice system but you can do it.)
    2. You can learn the Big History of the competition between civilizations and in particular between European and Semitic.(easy)
    3. You can learn why Europeans evolved faster than the rest, and developed the only truth telling, high trust, wealthy, advanced, technological, civilization in so short a span in the bronze, ancient, and modern worlds – except for our period of failure during the Abrahamic dark age. (relatively easy)
    4. You can learn a whole suite of the propertarian arguments (Takes some work)
    5. You can learn how to conduct propertarian arguments
      You can learn how to use the p-methodology (Not easy)
    6. And you can if you want to get into the foundations of the P-methodology, the completed scientific method, and logic and epistemology. (Hard)

    SO IF YOU WANT TO LEARN ANY OF THAT 1) you can use the site and read it. 2) you can follow along. 3) you can use my (Curt) friends list to contact and catch the attention of a mentor by asking for help: Alain, Martin, Bill, Luke, Brandon, Erik, Steve, Eli, …(there are a lot more) 4) you can take our course (if you are patient enough for me to slowly release content – and I mean slowly). The other folks are better teachers than I am. Really. By far.