The only thing we fil to contain is your endemic violence, crime, and failure to reform and failure to take responsibility for your community’s failures. Integrate, separate or civil war. but no more coddling the endemic criminal class.
Own it. Fix it.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-02 03:21:47 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267657637522481154
Reply addressees: @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267656256074002438
The only thing we fil to contain is your endemic violence, crime, and failure to reform and failure to take responsibility for your community’s failures. Integrate, separate or civil war. but no more coddling the endemic criminal class.
Own it. Fix it.
Reply addressees: @DanishPastry11 @_ReaalAmerican_ @realDonaldTrump
YARVIN VERSION TWO?
—“Yarvin is intellectually above something so pedestrian as detailing an actionable solution. His IQ is too high for that. He knows that changing the way people think will change their actions more reliably than simply shouting “do this!” and being right. ….Yarvin herds his readers into intellectual movements. He created NRx out of whole cloth. Now he is going to embed NRx into the mainstream. His cultural associations foreshadow the success of his new project, and perhaps signify a specific anointment to the cause. Sure, this isn’t the revolution. This is just a learning opportunity.”— Zachary Miller
I know you’re a fan. I have equally devoted fans. But because of my method I will always and everywhere have fewer fans, because the rigor is simply too difficult and costly an investment. Chris took a different approach – literary rather than scientific. It’s a tried and true method. He doesn’t have an IQ any higher than mine that’s for sure. One has to choose one’s rhetorical model, and he uses narrative engagement, historical analogy, empathy and suggestion, rather than declarative testable statements independent of empathy and sympathy. Let’s see what he does. I’m betting it’s the same message and technique recommending the same solution. If he sues for separation and competition I’ll be very pleasantly surprised. If he only succeeds in creating a frame for the three dimensions of the political triangle and popularizing it that will be enough.
YARVIN VERSION TWO?
—“Yarvin is intellectually above something so pedestrian as detailing an actionable solution. His IQ is too high for that. He knows that changing the way people think will change their actions more reliably than simply shouting “do this!” and being right. ….Yarvin herds his readers into intellectual movements. He created NRx out of whole cloth. Now he is going to embed NRx into the mainstream. His cultural associations foreshadow the success of his new project, and perhaps signify a specific anointment to the cause. Sure, this isn’t the revolution. This is just a learning opportunity.”— Zachary Miller
I know you’re a fan. I have equally devoted fans. But because of my method I will always and everywhere have fewer fans, because the rigor is simply too difficult and costly an investment. Chris took a different approach – literary rather than scientific. It’s a tried and true method. He doesn’t have an IQ any higher than mine that’s for sure. One has to choose one’s rhetorical model, and he uses narrative engagement, historical analogy, empathy and suggestion, rather than declarative testable statements independent of empathy and sympathy. Let’s see what he does. I’m betting it’s the same message and technique recommending the same solution. If he sues for separation and competition I’ll be very pleasantly surprised. If he only succeeds in creating a frame for the three dimensions of the political triangle and popularizing it that will be enough.
–“Quote: If FAMGA dropped off the face of the Earth, “Nearly all of your electronic devices would either stop working or would disappear, the internet would become nothing short of mass chaos, nearly all e-commerce activity would halt, and your undying thirst to watch cat videos would forever go unquenched.””—Matt Hulbert
These companies are protected by a combination of 1) effectively unlimited access to speculative credit markets; 2) domestic intellectual property rights; 3) ability to grind the court process; 4) unconstitutional (irreciprocal) disintermediation of the public from juridical defense in matters of the commons; 5) unhealthy american habit of inaction on consumer protection; 6) the slow pace of american legal adaptation to novel monopolies (Oil, Telecom, now internet service providers); 7) And at least, recently concern that such interference cascade would expose the weakness of the economy and its dependence on debt (financialization) and a narrow distribution of tech companies whose assets are being duplicated in china where none of these american ‘issues’ are a problem. I’m a conservative libertarian but our lack of consumer protection is criminal – tech is just obvious. Credit is even more criminal. I’ve lived in a very poor country (Ukraine) born costs in many, and there is no reason for most of the absurd costs we pay for what have converted from luxuries to infrastructure. Google is the national resource location platform, amazon the national shopping and delivery platform, and Facebook the national communication platform.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICAN AMERICANS THAT BAD POLICY DIDN’T CAUSE Subsaharan Africans ask me all the time. So do north africans. So do south americans. So do Egyptians and persians. So to south indians. “What is wrong with us?” There is nothing wrong other than many at the bottom in relation to the skills necessary for comparative advantage. Without comparative advantage (the ability to economically compete on world markets) you’re stuck in poverty – permanently. And it will not be possible to organize complex production without four to six generations of zero births at the bottom. It is not possible to produce a voluntary organization of production (market economy) and the incentives and efficiency of a market economy, nor a Pareto hierarchy of people and assets (people who know how to produce economic returns from productivity), with a bottom heavy distribution of population. It’s not POSSIBLE. There was a short window that the russians tried to use but everyone other than the russians failed, and the russians tried to use it for more than one generation. You can’t. It’s not possible. So, you see outrage blame and oppression where I see statistics: Why are blacks so excessively impulsive, violent, lacking discipline and agency? Well, the answer is (a) our tolerance for it (b) they mature earlier and we’re not providing training to a demographic that matures faster than all others (c) and instead forcing them to adhere to standards they can’t, without the training for it. (d) and then subjecting them to continuous negative signaling, social, economic, political, and police pressure because we failed to provide that training – and worse, because we failed to prohibit reproduction below minimum IQ and minimum trait conscientiousness, and minimum psychopathy (anti-social behavior). A century ago “George” would have been hanged by now and eliminated from the population. But we let women vote. And we let blacks into the franchise without first requiring full integration including into middle class manners ethics and morals. We let communsits, neo-marxists, socialists, postmodernists go unpunished instead of purging them like we did past heretics. We’re soft. We pay the price of our softness. He (“George”) did too. And the police officers will as well. We pay the cost of feminine magical thinking (a problem in males as well as females). A magical thinking that mothers require to invest in often hopeless offspring (a third of all children are in the bottom third so to speak), but women evidently cannot suppress that magical thinking political judgement and vote by intuition instead of empiricism, and are easy victims of pseudoscience that satisfies their magical thinking. Data is data. The harsh truths of black frustration, aggression, violence, personality, and intelligence distributions mean that the africans did not go through agrarian genetic pacification like peoples in colder climes, so that the vast majority of the african population is underclass and unemployable. We complain our white ancestors may have been oppressed. But that’s counter to the evidence. they were domesticated (genetically pacified) like all other animals, by selection for living in close quarters in cold climates with limited growing seasons. So were east asians. The warmer climes were not. This is why there is such a difference between european and east asians, and an even greater difference between protestant europeans who practiced bipartite manorialism, and even grater difference with north sea europeans who did so for longer, and were under the absolute nuclear family – where you could not reproduce unless you could demonstrate marriage, and character necessary to obtain farm land. The dirty secret of western civlization is we have been practicing soft eugenics for four thousand years. By the late middle ages all of north and central europe was genetically middle class. Under normal conditions, african americans would evolve traditions, norms, manners, ethics and morals within the community that would mitigate their behavior at their faster rate of maturity and resulting higher impulsivity. Under FORCED INTEGRATION we prohibit their formation of ingroup manners, ethics, morals, institutions, and elites. So instead of continuing pre-mid-century separation, continuing pre-war eugenics, letting the black community continue to develop a middle class and institutions suitable to their rates and depths of development (sexual maturity), and the self respect from having done so – the democratic party (seeking power by seeking dependents) has destroyed their culture and made them dysgenic, incompetent, dependents victim-signaling from a life of continuous hopelessness. There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible by trade in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce. And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools. Separate. Evolve. Prosper, and cooperate by markets where we cannot cooperate in neighborhoods, business, commons, or even polities. Whites rule better than all other people on earth by a long shot. But self rule is always preferable. And cities can functions as markets for heterogeneity as they have throughout history, while outside them we maintain our homogeneity, and the resulting, high trust, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and resulting, laws institutions, and knowledge.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH AFRICAN AMERICANS THAT BAD POLICY DIDN’T CAUSE Subsaharan Africans ask me all the time. So do north africans. So do south americans. So do Egyptians and persians. So to south indians. “What is wrong with us?” There is nothing wrong other than many at the bottom in relation to the skills necessary for comparative advantage. Without comparative advantage (the ability to economically compete on world markets) you’re stuck in poverty – permanently. And it will not be possible to organize complex production without four to six generations of zero births at the bottom. It is not possible to produce a voluntary organization of production (market economy) and the incentives and efficiency of a market economy, nor a Pareto hierarchy of people and assets (people who know how to produce economic returns from productivity), with a bottom heavy distribution of population. It’s not POSSIBLE. There was a short window that the russians tried to use but everyone other than the russians failed, and the russians tried to use it for more than one generation. You can’t. It’s not possible. So, you see outrage blame and oppression where I see statistics: Why are blacks so excessively impulsive, violent, lacking discipline and agency? Well, the answer is (a) our tolerance for it (b) they mature earlier and we’re not providing training to a demographic that matures faster than all others (c) and instead forcing them to adhere to standards they can’t, without the training for it. (d) and then subjecting them to continuous negative signaling, social, economic, political, and police pressure because we failed to provide that training – and worse, because we failed to prohibit reproduction below minimum IQ and minimum trait conscientiousness, and minimum psychopathy (anti-social behavior). A century ago “George” would have been hanged by now and eliminated from the population. But we let women vote. And we let blacks into the franchise without first requiring full integration including into middle class manners ethics and morals. We let communsits, neo-marxists, socialists, postmodernists go unpunished instead of purging them like we did past heretics. We’re soft. We pay the price of our softness. He (“George”) did too. And the police officers will as well. We pay the cost of feminine magical thinking (a problem in males as well as females). A magical thinking that mothers require to invest in often hopeless offspring (a third of all children are in the bottom third so to speak), but women evidently cannot suppress that magical thinking political judgement and vote by intuition instead of empiricism, and are easy victims of pseudoscience that satisfies their magical thinking. Data is data. The harsh truths of black frustration, aggression, violence, personality, and intelligence distributions mean that the africans did not go through agrarian genetic pacification like peoples in colder climes, so that the vast majority of the african population is underclass and unemployable. We complain our white ancestors may have been oppressed. But that’s counter to the evidence. they were domesticated (genetically pacified) like all other animals, by selection for living in close quarters in cold climates with limited growing seasons. So were east asians. The warmer climes were not. This is why there is such a difference between european and east asians, and an even greater difference between protestant europeans who practiced bipartite manorialism, and even grater difference with north sea europeans who did so for longer, and were under the absolute nuclear family – where you could not reproduce unless you could demonstrate marriage, and character necessary to obtain farm land. The dirty secret of western civlization is we have been practicing soft eugenics for four thousand years. By the late middle ages all of north and central europe was genetically middle class. Under normal conditions, african americans would evolve traditions, norms, manners, ethics and morals within the community that would mitigate their behavior at their faster rate of maturity and resulting higher impulsivity. Under FORCED INTEGRATION we prohibit their formation of ingroup manners, ethics, morals, institutions, and elites. So instead of continuing pre-mid-century separation, continuing pre-war eugenics, letting the black community continue to develop a middle class and institutions suitable to their rates and depths of development (sexual maturity), and the self respect from having done so – the democratic party (seeking power by seeking dependents) has destroyed their culture and made them dysgenic, incompetent, dependents victim-signaling from a life of continuous hopelessness. There is nothing wrong with black people that self-governance would not cure. While all peoples are compatible by trade in markets, not all people are compatible in neighborhoods, commons, education, and the workforce. And so, you ‘idealistic idiots’ are well meaning but cruel fools. Separate. Evolve. Prosper, and cooperate by markets where we cannot cooperate in neighborhoods, business, commons, or even polities. Whites rule better than all other people on earth by a long shot. But self rule is always preferable. And cities can functions as markets for heterogeneity as they have throughout history, while outside them we maintain our homogeneity, and the resulting, high trust, manners, ethics, morals, traditions, and resulting, laws institutions, and knowledge.
I don’t do ideology. I do constitutional reform.
Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492
I don’t do ideology. I do constitutional reform.
Source date (UTC): 2020-06-01 20:14:46 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267550174165032961
Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267549962751094788
I dont go there. I look for answers. The answer is obvious.
We just need to stop with postwar ideology of marxism, neo-marxism, postmodernism, feminism, hbd-denialism, political correctness, and face-over-truth. When the secret of western civ is truth-over-face and mkt eugenics.
Reply addressees: @JodyHighRollr @RumorDr @essential_1492