Theme: Reciprocity

  • THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL “A universally commensurable, value neutral,

    THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
    “A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).

    Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.

    And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.

    P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.

    It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
    However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.

    But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077197983747

  • THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL “A universally commensurable, value neutral,

    THE UNIVERSE AND MAN IN A NUTSHELL
    “A universally commensurable, value neutral, paradigm, vocabulary, and grammar of ethics, morality, and politics” results in a formal logic of cooperation (returns on time), and as such a formal logic of law (conflict resolution), and formal logic of politics (commons), and formal logic of economics (scale).

    Now, you wouldn’t think all this was possible, but it turns out that there is just one fundamental law to the universe (evolutionary computation), and a tiny set of derivations of (applications of) that law, as we scale the complexity of the universe from the quantum background to matter, to life, to cooperation(ternary logic), to the words we speak and ideas we produce.

    And as such we can measure variation from that law – that ‘optimum’ minimum variation from the laws of the universe, and maximum exploitation of those laws of the universe, by discovering new means of evolutionary computation wjether by matter biology, cooperation, or ideas. Because there is only one means of improving man’s condition while under continous evolution, and that’s the capture and transformation of energy per capita.

    P-Method, P-Logic, P-Law an the Legal,Constitutional, and Policy Reforms, necessary for our continued evolution – and prevention of another dark age.

    It’s a lot of work. As much as any other STEM degree.
    However, it is the unification of the sciences: physical, behavioral, evolutionary, and formal.

    But it is also the most demanding of our psychology and emotions – because we prefer to cheat mother nature whenever possible. And in doing so violate the laws of nature we call ‘cooperation’.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-22 13:48:14 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638538077063847936

  • Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE? If we made a ‘religi

    Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE?
    If we made a ‘religion’ of laws of nature, natural law of cooperation, our intergenerational debts to nature, heroes, ancestors(archetypes), civilization(traditions and institutions), and to one another (civil society), and stoic discipline (cognitive behavioral training), and where those laws are a standard of weights and measures, and our debts were weights and measure of our behaviors, then how would that religion vary from teaching all of us the truth of the universe, man, and civilization, and how to function optimally in it? Isn’t social repetition of oath and ritual but testimony and promise that we will limit ourselves to that which is mutually beneficial? It sure appears that a true, ethical, moral, and good religion is possible. But those who practice false, unethical, immoral, and not-good religions will resist – of course. Because they don’t know that their religions are false, unethical, immoral, and not=good. Yet they are addicted to them because it is how they intuit the right and wrong of their own behaviors. And they fear doing differently.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:19:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637911738141007874

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637909279700033536

  • Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE? If we made a ‘religi

    Q: IS A TRUE, ETHICAL, MORAL, AND “GOOD” RELIGION POSSIBLE?
    If we made a ‘religion’ of laws of nature, natural law of cooperation, our intergenerational debts to nature, heroes, ancestors(archetypes), civilization(traditions and institutions), and to one another (civil society), and stoic discipline (cognitive behavioral training), and where those laws are a standard of weights and measures, and our debts were weights and measure of our behaviors, then how would that religion vary from teaching all of us the truth of the universe, man, and civilization, and how to function optimally in it? Isn’t social repetition of oath and ritual but testimony and promise that we will limit ourselves to that which is mutually beneficial? It sure appears that a true, ethical, moral, and good religion is possible. But those who practice false, unethical, immoral, and not-good religions will resist – of course. Because they don’t know that their religions are false, unethical, immoral, and not=good. Yet they are addicted to them because it is how they intuit the right and wrong of their own behaviors. And they fear doing differently.

    Reply addressees: @FrankRe07770590 @erikbrus25


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 20:19:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637911738002690050

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637909279700033536

  • Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?” (yes but it’s fixable) Right n

    Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?”
    (yes but it’s fixable)
    Right now it sure does. However, that’s due to “positive law” that violated natural law, the common law, concurrent legislation, and all evidence across all of human history. if we are going to permit divorces then we have to restore liability for interference in a marriage, and end no-fault divorce, child support, and alimony. And AFAIK that will all end this decade.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 18:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637878159738646528

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637869080366440450

  • Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?” (yes but it’s fixable) Right n

    Q: IS MARRIAGE IN THE WEST “BAITING INTO HAZARD?”
    (yes but it’s fixable)
    Right now it sure does. However, that’s due to “positive law” that violated natural law, the common law, concurrent legislation, and all evidence across all of human history. if we are going to permit divorces then we have to restore liability for interference in a marriage, and end no-fault divorce, child support, and alimony. And AFAIK that will all end this decade.

    Reply addressees: @Chris29819258


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-20 18:05:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637878159646261249

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1637869080366440450

  • Again. Reciprocity. It’s the first principle of ethics. Give what you get. If yo

    Again. Reciprocity. It’s the first principle of ethics. Give what you get. If you studied say the prisoner’s dilemma or Axelrod’s work and those of his followers you might begin to grasp it. Or if you had some knowledge of comparative law. But… nope. ;).


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 02:25:43 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636554376922685440

    Reply addressees: @MaybeAnnatar @cyberlich420 @iamzheanna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636552711947649026

  • If you know the directions, you can follow them dear. I have a simple rule. Reci

    If you know the directions, you can follow them dear.

    I have a simple rule.
    Reciprocity. 😉
    Give what you get.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:59:23 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636532647450083328

    Reply addressees: @mootsheep @iamzheanna

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636532095291129856

  • It’s OK dear. If you don’t comprehend something, you can just say so. Laws of na

    It’s OK dear. If you don’t comprehend something, you can just say so.
    Laws of nature (Physical laws) > Natural Laws (Laws of cooperation) > Evolutionary Laws > Logical laws (to describe physical cooperative evolutionary laws).

    It’s OK if you don’t know such things.
    You usually…


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-17 00:54:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636531345429086208

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636479430012043264

  • WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN? Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, an

    WHAT DOES WOKE MEAN?
    Woke? It means anti-whiteness, anti-white, anti-western, anti-national, anti-rule-of-law, anti-meritocracy, anti-reciprocity, anti-proportionality, anti-male, anti-truth.

    In other words, it’s just the newest term in the Abrahamic to Marxist Evolution of rebellion by sedition:

    The cult of envy and hatred: #marxism(class) > #neomarxism(culture) > #postmodernism (truth) > #feminism (sex) > #woke (race) > hatred sequence.

    #WokeIsHate


    Source date (UTC): 2023-03-15 21:00:53 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636110242135040006

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1636109112151887880