Natural Law of the West > Laws of Men, Sharia of Islam, Talmud of Jews.
Natural Law results in man’s transcendence into gods. Abrahamism, Paul, and Muhammed results in landlessness and parasitism (jews) or mindlessness and parasitism (islam). The god of Abraham is the devil.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:20:00 UTC
https://propertarianism.com/2017/04/12/definition-law/—“CURT, WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY NATURAL LAW BECAUSE [INSERT SOPHOMORIC INSULT HERE]?”—
**I am one of the most prolific if not most prolific philosophers today and you can’t use a f–king search engine?***
A DEFINITION OF LAW
https://propertarianism.com/2017/04/12/definition-law/
A SHORT COURSE IN NATURAL LAW
https://propertarianism.com/2017/03/29/a-short-course-in-natural-law/
OMFG
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 11:33:00 UTC
Why isn’t the correct answer that Jesus read and understood the Greeks and Stoics and was bringing natural law to the Jews?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 11:27:00 UTC
WHY DO WE NEED BULLSHIT AND LIES?
Eh. ya know. I work on natural law. Propertarianism is a just formal logic for the expression of natural law. And everything I say ties back to natural law, and so I go on religion about jesus and a few people sort of get some part of it but the point is simple: jesus was, in primitive verse, stating natural law. the rest is all bullshit and lies to get you to submit to natural law.
why do we need bullshit and lies?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 11:23:00 UTC
SECRET: HERE IS WHAT I’M GETTING AT: THERE IS NOTHING IN CHRISTIANITY THAT IS TRUE BUT THE WORDS OF JESUS, AND THERE IS NOTHING IN THE WORDS OF JESUS THAT IS NOT IN NATURAL LAW.
SO WHY LIE?
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 11:21:00 UTC
By Brian Barr
—“Property rights are for farmers / human rights are for migrants (hunters) – when it comes to economics these are both reflex propositions in response to defection or tragedy of the commons. The problem we have today is past that of even managing the despoiling of commons: the ecosystem has become a people-system and the main problem with this is that people can occupy every niche but they don’t eat each other. This is unnatural/unsustainable, so that it’s escalating – more effort is called for from everyone in a kind of hysteria, and there is no proper instinctive response in place.”—
The first sentence is exceptional. I can’t edit the rest down, so I’ll say that absent natural competitors, we have *YET* no institutional means to constrain humans from overconsumption.
Hence, markets in everything and constraint on reproduction to those who are productive.
Curt
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 08:09:00 UTC
Apr 09, 2017 6:01am RATIONAL SELF INTEREST by John Dow Assuming self-interest is rational, by punishing all non-reciprocating choices via law, acting in group interest becomes rational. I don’t care if you reciprocate by rational self-interest or as a result of high prosociality, as long as you reciprocate. Assuming the maximization of group fitness has higher potential yields to individual fitness than any other factor, and assuming the maximization of individual fitness is desired, this is rational self-interest.
Apr 09, 2017 6:01am RATIONAL SELF INTEREST by John Dow Assuming self-interest is rational, by punishing all non-reciprocating choices via law, acting in group interest becomes rational. I don’t care if you reciprocate by rational self-interest or as a result of high prosociality, as long as you reciprocate. Assuming the maximization of group fitness has higher potential yields to individual fitness than any other factor, and assuming the maximization of individual fitness is desired, this is rational self-interest.
THE PEOPLE WHO MATTER
The people who matter?
When it comes time for war – the war to demand restoration of Natural Law, or to wreak heady murder in its stead – will you fight with me brother?
The rest is just prattle of schoolgirls.
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 15:47:00 UTC
(You’re just dimmer. Hence we must rule you. Of course we must rule morally, and defensively. If we rule you by natural law, then that is purely defensive, and purely moral, just as non-aggression is purely defensive, just as non-imposition is purely defensive. But the smart must rule the dim or they will be defeated by the dim, and mankind will suffer.)
Source date (UTC): 2017-04-12 13:13:00 UTC