Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • THE MARKET FOR RECIPROCITY? Yes we can create a market for truthful (non false,

    THE MARKET FOR RECIPROCITY?

    Yes we can create a market for truthful (non false, non-parasitic) political speech. In fact, it was the state that ended our market for truthful speech. Why?

    …

    Isn’t science an ongoing discovery process? doesn’t it function as a market for information, with career ending punishments for violators?

    Don’t we protect against fraud and deceit in the market for goods and services – and provide special protections that PROHIBIT us from defending the market for information against fraud and deceit?

    Didn’t we, for millennia, protect against libel(written) and slander(spoken), and don’t we grant special privileges that prevent us from using the course to protect ourselves from libel and slander – especially in large scale media? In other words, doesn’t the state PROHIBIT us from self defense against falsehoods?

    Why is it that we cannot in private advocate for conspiracy (theft), yet in public can advocate for conspiracy (theft) as long as the majority of conspirators approve of the theft?

    Why is it that we used to be able to protect the environment,and the commons via the judiciary, but the state removed our juridical defense?

    Why is it that the state removed our juridical defense against members of the bureaucracy, the government, the academy, and the media?

    Are you going to try to advocate that reciprocity (natural law) is not, in cooperation, the equivalence of truth (decidability)?

    Or are you saying specifically that people should be able to violate reciprocity and violate truth in order to use large numbers to impose thefts using the violence of the government, in order to obtain by non-reciprocity and deceit, that which they might obtain by voluntary exchange, thereby depriving those who have one thing from obtaining another thing in exchange?

    Just because you can’t figure out how to create law of information regarding political speech (forcible coercion) such that it holds to the same standards as market speech (goods, services, and information) doesn’t mean it can’t be done. In fact. it was done for millennia.

    The question is why did the state take it away, and why can we not restore it?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 13:44:00 UTC

  • DEFLATIONARY GOVERNMENT: 0) A militia consisting of shareholders who reciprocall

    DEFLATIONARY GOVERNMENT:

    0) A militia consisting of shareholders who reciprocally and unconditionally, insure one another’s property-in-toto from the involuntary imposition of costs by both members and non.

    1) A contract (constitution) between those shareholders for that reciprocal insurance, consisting of Rule of law, natural law, universal standing, universal applicability, absence of discretion through strict construction, with a monarchy as a judge (veto) of last resort. And providing for:

    2) A market for polities in which many small polities compete by the production of different commons. (btw: what polities will attract not only the most, but the best women?)

    3) A market for the production of commons within any given polity, by exchange between the classes (those with different reproductive strategies, capabilities, and capital interests)

    4) A Market for the production of goods and services within any given polity by exchanges between individuals and organizations OTHER than those that exclusively produce commons.

    5) A market for the production of generations (marriage) within any given polity, within any given market for commons, within any given market for production of goods, services, and information.

    6) A market for association and cooperation, within the market for polities, the market for commons, the market for private goods, the market for reproduction.

    7) A market for the resolution of disputes over property in toto by application and strict construction of the natural law of cooperation: reciprocity. (Judiciary)

    8) A market for the production of contracts (agreements) in all markets (lawyers)

    9) An insurer of last resort consisting of: A military of last resort, A treasury of last resort (shares in the nation), An insurer against acts of nature, age, and incompetence of last resort.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 13:25:00 UTC

  • **Markets in everything. I have no confidence in my own wisdom, and even less in

    **Markets in everything. I have no confidence in my own wisdom, and even less in the wisdom of any other man.***

    Rule of law, natural law, universal standing, universal application. Leaving no option but markets in everything by which to obtain our wants, and needs.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-16 08:47:00 UTC

  • Q: “WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?” What is Propertarianism? A scientific, meaning des

    Q: “WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?”

    What is Propertarianism?

    A scientific, meaning descriptive, statement of Natural Law.

    What is Natural Law?

    A fully decidable (universal) Law of Ethics.

    What do you mean by ethics?

    The law of cooperation and conflict resolution.

    What is this law of cooperation and conflict resolution?

    Reciprocity.

    WHAT IS RECIPROCITY?

    In the Negative (Silver Rule, or via-negativa): The requirement to avoid the imposition of costs on that which others have born costs to obtain an interest in, without imposing costs upon that which others have likewise born costs to obtain an interest in.

    In the Positive(Golden Rule, or via-positiva): the requirement that we limit our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of the imposition of costs by externality, upon that which others have obtained by the same means.

    As determined by the either any change, or the total change in the inventory that all parties both internal and external to the action have born costs to obtain an interest without imposition of costs upon others directly or indirectly by externality.

    —“All of ethics can be reduced to [is a subset/special application of] the degree of reciprocity & the the accounting thereof.— James Augustus

    WHY DOES RECIPROCITY SERVE AS NATURAL LAW?

    Because it is apparently impossible to contradict reciprocity in cooperation (ethics), and as such it provides perfect decidability in all contexts of cooperation at all scales in all times, and under all conditions.

    WHERE IS THE NAME PROPERTARIANISM FROM?

    why didn’t we use Natural Law or Reciprocity, or Sovereignty, and why did we use Propertarianism?

    We used propertarianism because property, like money, provides the unit of measurement – the test – of changes in state caused by our actions. Property in toto, (that which others have born costs to obtain an interest without imposing costs upon the interests of others) like money, like any standard of measure in any field, provides a perfect test of reciprocity: cooperation.

    Natural Law has been ‘tainted’ by various authors, so we had to differentiate ourselves from those previous authors.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-15 16:32:00 UTC

  • “All of ethics can be reduced to [is a subset/special application of] the degree

    —“All of ethics can be reduced to [is a subset/special application of] the degree of reciprocity & the the accounting thereof.— James Augustus

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-14 21:40:00 UTC

  • My mom. Adult Christianty is excellent: it’s all just parables. There is only on

    My mom. Adult Christianty is excellent: it’s all just parables. There is only one message: do unto others…. But you have to FEEL it.

    And there is the rub. You can’t FEEL that stuff any longer.

    Her statement: “The church was too late”.

    I said. Well, the moment you have no means of measurement, whether your the church, the chinese government, or the american treasury, or amerian (lost) rule of law – you must revert to what you ‘sense’ and feel. And when you do that you must rely upon intuitions.

    So you lose causal relations. If you don’t know causal relations, you lose the ability to change inputs, operations, and outputs.

    the church evolved as an institution by which to manage an poor ignorant population by deception. And the church succeeded in providing administration (and vast corruption) to the illiterate people of europe (that they ensured remained illiterate),

    The minute the church fathers lied to themselves about the function of their work, they were dead.

    The academy took the money by market (sale of degrees) rather than tax (tithe) and created a new priesthood that did the same (government and teachers).

    The problem? degrees are now indulgences – meaningless.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-14 15:57:00 UTC

  • I advocate a world that ostracizes, punishes, or kills those who behave parasiti

    I advocate a world that ostracizes, punishes, or kills those who behave parasitically on the production of others, whether produced by private, kin, or common, and whether life, physical, institutional, normative, or informational.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-14 08:08:00 UTC

  • ETHICS AND POLITICS IN A NUTSHELL by Joel Davis We all want things to happen. We

    ETHICS AND POLITICS IN A NUTSHELL

    by Joel Davis

    We all want things to happen.

    We all try to make them happen.

    By the principle of recipriocity, we may develop a strategy which maximizes the likelihood of making the things we want to happen, happen.

    How?

    If people help you make the things you want to happen, help them in return.

    If people don’t help or hinder making what you want to happen, don’t help or hinder them in return.

    If people hinder you or the people who help you trying to make what you want to happen, hinder them in return, and if they don’t stop, kill them.

    That way all the people who can help you will want to help you because you help them.

    All the people who can’t help you will leave you alone because you leave them alone.

    And, all the people who fuck up what you are trying to get done will either stop or die (and therefore stop).

    Now, we establish families, friendships, communities, societies, nations and civilizations precisely so we can help each other make the things we want to happen.

    So in order for these things to work best, we must help each other leave others alone who leave us alone and hinder others who hinder us and kill them if they don’t stop.

    Otherwise we will lower the chances of making what we want to happen, happen.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-14 07:50:00 UTC

  • Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?

    Why is non-aggression insufficient? Why do we claim we have duties such as war?

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 14:05:00 UTC

  • To deny Natural Law is to destroy mankind. Islam and Judaism deny natural law

    To deny Natural Law is to destroy mankind. Islam and Judaism deny natural law.

    Source date (UTC): 2017-04-13 12:23:00 UTC