Theme: Reciprocity

  • Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, tha

    Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, that are limited to productive externalities, without possibility of competition or even criticism since any criticism of rule of law of reciprocity can only consist of fraud or deceit. If fascism means “prohibition on political competition” then that is in fact ‘rule of law under reciprocity’. Nationalism and limited socialism are both possible and necessary under such market constraints (really). As such I see the term ‘fascism’ as meaning nothing other than non-competitition in political order, leaving open the question of how such a political order is managed. From my understanding, the optimum means of providing rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, markets for goods, services, and information, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (family), production, is a monarchy as justice of of last resort, an independent judiciary, a universal militia, and if small enough, the discretionary production of commons by the monarchy. And if too large, the creation of a market for commons between the classes wherein each house is limited to those members who have demonstrated success prior to access. The the house of dependents, the house of families, the house of commerce, the house of militia (military), the house of law (judiciary) with the judiciary, military, and Monarchy holding only veto power. In that sense, I am a fascist: all political competition against the natural law of reciprocity is either fraud or war.
  • “I swear to all those came before me, all those present, and all those yet to be

    “I swear to all those came before me, all those present, and all those yet to be…”
  • Transcendence Beauty Excellence Truth Agency Sovereignty Reciprocity Markets

    Transcendence Beauty Excellence Truth Agency Sovereignty Reciprocity Markets
  • Transcendence Beauty Excellence Truth Agency Sovereignty Reciprocity Markets

    Transcendence Beauty Excellence Truth Agency Sovereignty Reciprocity Markets
  • Transcendence Beauty Excellence Truth Agency Sovereignty Reciprocity Markets

    Transcendence

    Beauty

    Excellence

    Truth

    Agency

    Sovereignty

    Reciprocity

    Markets


    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 15:14:00 UTC

  • Peterson (Teacher) Vs Doolittle (Judge) But Otherwise Very Similar

    We teach so that we identify opportunities and avoid pitfalls, and we judge so that we limit opportunities to the reciprocal, and retaliate against profiting from pitfalls. Peterson : Wisdom (Lit.) Doolittle: Law (Science) —“Jordan Curt Doolittle Peterson, Kiev Ukraine.”— TheForging545 Unfortunately, Peterson’s version of ‘Truth’ (as we saw in him crash and burn in the Harris debate) is not Truth in the western (legal) sense, but wisdom in the semitic (literary) sense. While Peterson is unknowingly reconstructing stoicism in literature, I’m knowingly reconstructing it in science, philosophy, and law. 😉 But I can understand the appeal of wisdom and literature over algorithm, science, and law. Intuition is much cheaper and easier than calculation. 😉
  • Peterson (Teacher) Vs Doolittle (Judge) But Otherwise Very Similar

    We teach so that we identify opportunities and avoid pitfalls, and we judge so that we limit opportunities to the reciprocal, and retaliate against profiting from pitfalls. Peterson : Wisdom (Lit.) Doolittle: Law (Science) —“Jordan Curt Doolittle Peterson, Kiev Ukraine.”— TheForging545 Unfortunately, Peterson’s version of ‘Truth’ (as we saw in him crash and burn in the Harris debate) is not Truth in the western (legal) sense, but wisdom in the semitic (literary) sense. While Peterson is unknowingly reconstructing stoicism in literature, I’m knowingly reconstructing it in science, philosophy, and law. 😉 But I can understand the appeal of wisdom and literature over algorithm, science, and law. Intuition is much cheaper and easier than calculation. 😉
  • PETERSON (TEACHER) VS DOOLITTLE (JUDGE) BUT OTHERWISE VERY SIMILAR We teach so t

    PETERSON (TEACHER) VS DOOLITTLE (JUDGE) BUT OTHERWISE VERY SIMILAR

    We teach so that we identify opportunities and avoid pitfalls, and we judge so that we limit opportunities to the reciprocal, and retaliate against profiting from pitfalls.

    Peterson : Wisdom (Lit.) Doolittle: Law (Science)

    —“Jordan Curt Doolittle Peterson, Kiev Ukraine.”— TheForging545

    Unfortunately, Peterson’s version of ‘Truth’ (as we saw in him crash and burn in the Harris debate) is not Truth in the western (legal) sense, but wisdom in the semitic (literary) sense. While Peterson is unknowingly reconstructing stoicism in literature, I’m knowingly reconstructing it in science, philosophy, and law. 😉 But I can understand the appeal of wisdom and literature over algorithm, science, and law. Intuition is much cheaper and easier than calculation. ;)


    Source date (UTC): 2017-10-10 11:22:00 UTC

  • Christianity And Natural Law

    Christianity is reducible to the extension of kinship trust to non kin. What we call ‘Christian Love’ means treating others as kin. Now, Natural Law is reducible to reciprocity. But it turns out that being very forgiving, over time, is the best possible cooperative strategy. While we evolved altruistic punishment for the untrustworthy (violators of reciprocity), meaning that we retaliate at high cost against ‘cheaters’ (untrustworthy), it turns out that exhausting forgiveness produces the highest trust polity, and by consequence the most prosperous. Unfortunately, the limit of such tolerance is in interpersonal relationships and does not scale AT ALL. And so christian tolerance in politics and group evolutionary strategy is suicidal, even if christian tolerance in interpersonal relations is extremely beneficial. The reason being is that an individual can eventually know the limit of tolerance for another, while none of us can know the exhaustion of tolerance for those we do not personally know. As such all christian tolerance and charity is limited to the interpersonal, and all political tolerance is limited to reciprocity. Because the moment we engage in political charity or unlimited charity we create the very evil that we seek to eliminate through our tolerance. Or in economic terms: if you subsidize any behavior you will always get more of it. This is not true on an interpersonal scale, but it is always true beyond the interpersonal scale. Worse, there are many people who seek virtue signals (status) by giving away that which others produced. They steal status from others by this means. So tolerance, especially christian tolerance, beyond the personal scale, where you pay the costs of your charity yourself, merely creates more evil in the world. For this reason most christians are anything but. They are just seeking self congratulatory virtues without actually earning them – but instead, they become bad people in and of themselves, and subsidize bad people in politics, and subsidize bad people in the community. As such christianity is a defect if practiced on other than the interpersonal scale. So the optimum strategy is “A Prosecutor in Politics, and a Saint in Person.” Christianity became suicidal when it became political rather than merely personal. So so natural law then provides us with an equilibrium of the via-negativa and the-via positiva: the via-negativa (law) being reciprocity, while the via positive (wisdom) being interpersonal exhaustion of opportunity for cooperation. You see, this is why science and scientific law are so important: so that those who pretend they are good are not able to create evil on vast scales under cloak of moral intentions. If you bear no sacrifice, you can earn no virtue. Period. And that is a necessary consequence of the natural law of reciprocity.
  • Christianity And Natural Law

    Christianity is reducible to the extension of kinship trust to non kin. What we call ‘Christian Love’ means treating others as kin. Now, Natural Law is reducible to reciprocity. But it turns out that being very forgiving, over time, is the best possible cooperative strategy. While we evolved altruistic punishment for the untrustworthy (violators of reciprocity), meaning that we retaliate at high cost against ‘cheaters’ (untrustworthy), it turns out that exhausting forgiveness produces the highest trust polity, and by consequence the most prosperous. Unfortunately, the limit of such tolerance is in interpersonal relationships and does not scale AT ALL. And so christian tolerance in politics and group evolutionary strategy is suicidal, even if christian tolerance in interpersonal relations is extremely beneficial. The reason being is that an individual can eventually know the limit of tolerance for another, while none of us can know the exhaustion of tolerance for those we do not personally know. As such all christian tolerance and charity is limited to the interpersonal, and all political tolerance is limited to reciprocity. Because the moment we engage in political charity or unlimited charity we create the very evil that we seek to eliminate through our tolerance. Or in economic terms: if you subsidize any behavior you will always get more of it. This is not true on an interpersonal scale, but it is always true beyond the interpersonal scale. Worse, there are many people who seek virtue signals (status) by giving away that which others produced. They steal status from others by this means. So tolerance, especially christian tolerance, beyond the personal scale, where you pay the costs of your charity yourself, merely creates more evil in the world. For this reason most christians are anything but. They are just seeking self congratulatory virtues without actually earning them – but instead, they become bad people in and of themselves, and subsidize bad people in politics, and subsidize bad people in the community. As such christianity is a defect if practiced on other than the interpersonal scale. So the optimum strategy is “A Prosecutor in Politics, and a Saint in Person.” Christianity became suicidal when it became political rather than merely personal. So so natural law then provides us with an equilibrium of the via-negativa and the-via positiva: the via-negativa (law) being reciprocity, while the via positive (wisdom) being interpersonal exhaustion of opportunity for cooperation. You see, this is why science and scientific law are so important: so that those who pretend they are good are not able to create evil on vast scales under cloak of moral intentions. If you bear no sacrifice, you can earn no virtue. Period. And that is a necessary consequence of the natural law of reciprocity.