(repost)(profoundly important graphic)
(organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).
1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.
2) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.
3) cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.
4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment). They protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.
5) rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).
6) prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.
7) prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.
8) community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.
9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)
10) high trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.
11) as a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.
Aristocracy, Egalitarianism, morality, Nomocracy, meritocracy, Science, and eugenic evolution are mutually dependent.
The chart below shows the incremental suppression of parasitism stating from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.
Only the west succeeded in developing truth.
And without it we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.
Truth matters above all else.
Pseudoscience is just babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes.
This emperor is naked also.
Truth is enough to rescue the west.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23316751_10155870774042264_47157285
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_43196237263/23316751_10155870774042264_471572855348292358_n_10155870774042264.jpg THE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
(repost)(profoundly important graphic)
(organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).
1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.
2) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.
3) cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.
4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment). They protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.
5) rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).
6) prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.
7) prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.
8) community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.
9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)
10) high trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.
11) as a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.
Aristocracy, Egalitarianism, morality, Nomocracy, meritocracy, Science, and eugenic evolution are mutually dependent.
The chart below shows the incremental suppression of parasitism stating from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.
Only the west succeeded in developing truth.
And without it we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.
Truth matters above all else.
Pseudoscience is just babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes.
This emperor is naked also.
Truth is enough to rescue the west.Oliver WestcottEgalitarianism? Do you mean before the law?Nov 10, 2017 9:37amCurt DoolittleAristocratic Egalitarianism refers to (a) the peerage, and (b) the aristocracy’s openness to increasing their numbers. In other words, western aristocracy functioned as a market.Nov 10, 2017 9:50amCurt DoolittleThis is largely to do with the inability of peoples above the 45th latitude, and roughly centered on the eurasian plain to concentrate agrarian production as had done the flood river civilizations.Nov 10, 2017 9:52amTHE MEANING OF INCREMENTAL SUPPRESSION
(repost)(profoundly important graphic)
(organic common law as a means of incrementally suppressing free riding).
1) Humans acquire at cost and defend what they have acquired at cost.
2) cooperation is disproportionately more productive than predation.
3) cooperation is only preferable to predation in the total absence of parasitism. Or, what we call free-riding.
4) Because of the disproportionate value of cooperation, Humans retaliate against free riding even if at high cost ( altruistic punishment). They protect the institution by severe policing of cheaters.
5) rules against free riding, either normative or codified in law, prohibit parasitism (free riding).
6) prohibitions that are habituated in norms or codified in law provide a means of decision making in matters of conflict.
7) prohibitions against parasitism can be positively expressed as contractual “rights”.
8) community member (shareholders in the local market) insure one another by suppressing retaliation against settlements of grievances according to norms and laws.
9) The common, organic law allows for the least time lapse between an innovation in the means of parasitism and the construction of a prohibition against this new means of parasitism expressed as new law. As such all laws are discovered. (very important)
10) high trust societies use common law to incrementally suppress all available means of free riding, leaving productive participation in the market as the only viable means of survival.
11) as a consequence, the reproduction of the lower classes is suppressed and the distribution of talents increases along with the innovations in technology. (market eugenics). Thus obviating the need for tyranny and redistribution.
Aristocracy, Egalitarianism, morality, Nomocracy, meritocracy, Science, and eugenic evolution are mutually dependent.
The chart below shows the incremental suppression of parasitism stating from the suppression of violence through fraud, through conspiracy, through immigration, through conquest.
Only the west succeeded in developing truth.
And without it we cannot have the jury. And without the jury no judge or common law.
Truth matters above all else.
Pseudoscience is just babylonian monotheistic mysticism in new clothes.
This emperor is naked also.
Truth is enough to rescue the west.
Source date (UTC): 2017-11-10 09:03:00 UTC
-
The Virtuous Cycle Of Western Civilization
Martial Risk Produces Reward. Opportunity for Reward produces Heroism. Martial Heroism produces Meritocracy. Meritocracy produces Sovereignty. Sovereignty produces Natural Law. Natural law produces markets. Markets produce Prosperity. Prosperity increases competitiveness. Competitiveness decreases martial risk.
-
The Virtuous Cycle Of Western Civilization
Martial Risk Produces Reward. Opportunity for Reward produces Heroism. Martial Heroism produces Meritocracy. Meritocracy produces Sovereignty. Sovereignty produces Natural Law. Natural law produces markets. Markets produce Prosperity. Prosperity increases competitiveness. Competitiveness decreases martial risk.
-
On Self Ownership
–“Self ownership cannot exist because ownership requires reciprocity.”— by Bill Joslin: What about possession? Context: In fact : Possession – what you can defend is yours Agreement : Property– what others agree is yours is yours Legal : 3rd party insurance of ownership agreement In fact : (de facto) soverienty – hold monopoly of violence over a domain Agreement (De jur): recognition of soverienty by other soveriegns (example Israel) Legal – (and currently non-existent) 3rd party ensurance of agreement of soverienty (no world power to enforce) The notion of possessing the volition of another can not exist ‘in fact’ only in agreement. (a slave agrees to be a slave when given this choice: “be a slave or die”) In other words ownership of a human can not be demonstrated ‘in fact’, only in agreement and in law. The simple act of raising one’s arm or scratching one’s ass demonstrates possession of volition which, in fact, can only be the person doing the scratching. The only type of human ownership which remains coherent across all three domains (physical – in fact, social-agreement, legal-3rd party ensurance) is self ownership were by we agree to self ownership (ownership coheres to possession) and the law ensures it. Any other form of human ownership can only cohere to 2 of the 3 (agreement and law) To clarify further. Human volition remains bound by biology and thus can not be transferred, in fact, to another. One human’s volition bent to the will of another can only occur via agreement between the slave and master. The slave always retains possession and control. So the quote follows the same structure as libertarian arguments which rally for liberty while ignoring the physical necessity of soverienty for liberty’s existence. Liberty can only exist in agreement with the soveriegn and law by the soveriegn. Human ownership can only exist in agreement with the slave bolstered by the law of the masters. Just as libertarians seek liberty while avoiding the costs of soverienty, this argument seeks slavery without the requirement of reciprocity (slave’s agreement). I can only think of one reason to promote the idea – the wish to justify coercion.”—
-
On Self Ownership
–“Self ownership cannot exist because ownership requires reciprocity.”— by Bill Joslin: What about possession? Context: In fact : Possession – what you can defend is yours Agreement : Property– what others agree is yours is yours Legal : 3rd party insurance of ownership agreement In fact : (de facto) soverienty – hold monopoly of violence over a domain Agreement (De jur): recognition of soverienty by other soveriegns (example Israel) Legal – (and currently non-existent) 3rd party ensurance of agreement of soverienty (no world power to enforce) The notion of possessing the volition of another can not exist ‘in fact’ only in agreement. (a slave agrees to be a slave when given this choice: “be a slave or die”) In other words ownership of a human can not be demonstrated ‘in fact’, only in agreement and in law. The simple act of raising one’s arm or scratching one’s ass demonstrates possession of volition which, in fact, can only be the person doing the scratching. The only type of human ownership which remains coherent across all three domains (physical – in fact, social-agreement, legal-3rd party ensurance) is self ownership were by we agree to self ownership (ownership coheres to possession) and the law ensures it. Any other form of human ownership can only cohere to 2 of the 3 (agreement and law) To clarify further. Human volition remains bound by biology and thus can not be transferred, in fact, to another. One human’s volition bent to the will of another can only occur via agreement between the slave and master. The slave always retains possession and control. So the quote follows the same structure as libertarian arguments which rally for liberty while ignoring the physical necessity of soverienty for liberty’s existence. Liberty can only exist in agreement with the soveriegn and law by the soveriegn. Human ownership can only exist in agreement with the slave bolstered by the law of the masters. Just as libertarians seek liberty while avoiding the costs of soverienty, this argument seeks slavery without the requirement of reciprocity (slave’s agreement). I can only think of one reason to promote the idea – the wish to justify coercion.”—
-
ARYANISM The Production, Distribution and Utilization of Agency on Civilizationa
ARYANISM The Production, Distribution and Utilization of Agency on Civilizational Scale AGENCY: Violence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets, Transcendence TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Technological, (Or it doesn’t work, and we carry losses) 3 – Commercial (or we forgo opportunity) 4 – Normative (or we fail to create oppy’s for cooperation) 5 – Political (or we fail to create commons) 6 – Philosophical (or we fail to create common decidability) 7 – Theological (or we fail to create social mindfulness) 8 – Spiritual (or we fail to create personal mindfulness)
-
ARYANISM The Production, Distribution and Utilization of Agency on Civilizationa
ARYANISM The Production, Distribution and Utilization of Agency on Civilizational Scale AGENCY: Violence, Sovereignty, Reciprocity, Markets, Transcendence TRUTH: From Correspondence to Non-Correspondence 1 – Martial (Or we die) 2 – Technological, (Or it doesn’t work, and we carry losses) 3 – Commercial (or we forgo opportunity) 4 – Normative (or we fail to create oppy’s for cooperation) 5 – Political (or we fail to create commons) 6 – Philosophical (or we fail to create common decidability) 7 – Theological (or we fail to create social mindfulness) 8 – Spiritual (or we fail to create personal mindfulness)
-
Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, tha
Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, that are limited to productive externalities, without possibility of competition or even criticism since any criticism of rule of law of reciprocity can only consist of fraud or deceit. If fascism means “prohibition on political competition” then that is in fact ‘rule of law under reciprocity’. Nationalism and limited socialism are both possible and necessary under such market constraints (really). As such I see the term ‘fascism’ as meaning nothing other than non-competitition in political order, leaving open the question of how such a political order is managed. From my understanding, the optimum means of providing rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, markets for goods, services, and information, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (family), production, is a monarchy as justice of of last resort, an independent judiciary, a universal militia, and if small enough, the discretionary production of commons by the monarchy. And if too large, the creation of a market for commons between the classes wherein each house is limited to those members who have demonstrated success prior to access. The the house of dependents, the house of families, the house of commerce, the house of militia (military), the house of law (judiciary) with the judiciary, military, and Monarchy holding only veto power. In that sense, I am a fascist: all political competition against the natural law of reciprocity is either fraud or war. -
Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, tha
Rule of law under natural law of reciprocity requires markets in everything, that are limited to productive externalities, without possibility of competition or even criticism since any criticism of rule of law of reciprocity can only consist of fraud or deceit. If fascism means “prohibition on political competition” then that is in fact ‘rule of law under reciprocity’. Nationalism and limited socialism are both possible and necessary under such market constraints (really). As such I see the term ‘fascism’ as meaning nothing other than non-competitition in political order, leaving open the question of how such a political order is managed. From my understanding, the optimum means of providing rule of law under the natural law of reciprocity, markets for goods, services, and information, markets for association, cooperation, reproduction (family), production, is a monarchy as justice of of last resort, an independent judiciary, a universal militia, and if small enough, the discretionary production of commons by the monarchy. And if too large, the creation of a market for commons between the classes wherein each house is limited to those members who have demonstrated success prior to access. The the house of dependents, the house of families, the house of commerce, the house of militia (military), the house of law (judiciary) with the judiciary, military, and Monarchy holding only veto power.
In that sense, I am a fascist: all political competition against the natural law of reciprocity is either fraud or war.
Source date (UTC): 2017-10-27 10:28:00 UTC