That is (a) universal, (b) nationalist, (c) reciprocity (d) forcing markets in everything, (e) free of imposition of costs directly or indirectly, (f) and extreme intolerance for the opposites: internationalism, irreciprocity, discretionary rule over common and private. I’ve gone “full fash”. In the sense of militaristic, expansionist, zero tolerance for anything other than sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything.
Theme: Reciprocity
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. NATURAL LAW FACISM = MARKET FASCISM That is (
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
NATURAL LAW FACISM = MARKET FASCISM
That is (a) universal, (b) nationalist, (c) reciprocity (d) forcing markets in everything, (e) free of imposition of costs directly or indirectly, (f) and extreme intolerance for the opposites: internationalism, irreciprocity, discretionary rule over common and private.
I’ve gone “full fash”. In the sense of militaristic, expansionist, zero tolerance for anything other than sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 17:04:58 UTC
-
NATURAL LAW FACISM = MARKET FASCISM That is (a) universal, (b) nationalist, (c)
NATURAL LAW FACISM = MARKET FASCISM
That is (a) universal, (b) nationalist, (c) reciprocity (d) forcing markets in everything, (e) free of imposition of costs directly or indirectly, (f) and extreme intolerance for the opposites: internationalism, irreciprocity, discretionary rule over common and private.
I’ve gone “full fash”. In the sense of militaristic, expansionist, zero tolerance for anything other than sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-17 13:04:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle shared a video. MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS
Curt Doolittle shared a video.
MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS RIGHT (RECIPROCAL). WE HAVE CONQUERED ONE ANOTHER SINCE THE BEGINNING OF OUR SPECIES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 18:21:45 UTC
-
“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limite
—“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limited only by natural law. It’s far easier to stick near the top than to climb back up a path that took billions of years. Which way, western man?”— Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:46:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1018144669455220737
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. —“The lowering of standards has no bottom,
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
—“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limited only by natural law. It’s far easier to stick near the top than to climb back up a path that took billions of years. Which way, western man?”— Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:46:06 UTC
-
MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS RIGHT (RECIPROCAL). WE HAVE CON
MIGHT DOES MAKE WHAT EXISTS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS RIGHT (RECIPROCAL). WE HAVE CONQUERED ONE ANOTHER SINCE THE BEGINNING OF OUR SPECIES.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 14:21:00 UTC
-
“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limite
—“The lowering of standards has no bottom, but the raising of standards is limited only by natural law. It’s far easier to stick near the top than to climb back up a path that took billions of years. Which way, western man?”— Steve Pender
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-14 10:46:00 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITI
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
NATURAL LAW ON RACIAL PROFILING IN UNIVERSITIES
â-âIs it appropriate to racially profile college applicants to promote diversity in admissions?ââ-
If we use exclusively meritocratic entry, and domestic-only entry, then we arenât harming anyone in the polity because of their race.
If we use profiling (discriminatory) entry, and include international entry, then we **are harming** people in the polity because of their race.
The only moral (meaning reciprocal) and non-harmful method of allowing profiling (discrimination) is to allow (create) segregated (race-limited) universities.
So we are just (reciprocal, moral) **only** when we have EITHER of the two conditions:
(a) domestic merit only, or we have
(b) discrimination and voluntary association and disassociation (race – limited universities.)
And the current condition is harmful, immoral, unethical, and a violation of natural law of reciprocity.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 16:38:29 UTC
-
Curt Doolittle updated his status. WHAT IS NATURAL LAW? >A fully decidable (univ
Curt Doolittle updated his status.
WHAT IS NATURAL LAW?
>A fully decidable (universal) Law of Ethics.
What do you mean by ethics?
>The law of cooperation and conflict resolution.
What is this law of cooperation and conflict resolution?
>Reciprocity.
WHAT IS RECIPROCITY?
In the Negative (Silver Rule, or via-negativa): The requirement to avoid the imposition of costs on that which others have born costs to obtain an interest in, without imposing costs upon that which others have likewise born costs to obtain an interest in.
In the Positive(Golden Rule, or via-positiva): the requirement that we limit our actions to productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfers, free of the imposition of costs by externality, upon that which others have obtained by the same means.
As determined by the either any change, or the total change in the inventory that all parties both internal and external to the action have born costs to obtain an interest without imposition of costs upon others directly or indirectly by externality.
ââAll of ethics can be reduced to [is a subset/special application of] the degree of reciprocity & the accounting thereof.â James Augustus
WHY DOES RECIPROCITY SERVE AS NATURAL LAW?
Because it is apparently impossible to contradict reciprocity in cooperation (ethics), and as such it provides perfect decidability in all contexts of cooperation at all scales in all times, and under all conditions.
Source date (UTC): 2018-07-13 14:50:28 UTC