Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • I don’t know what ‘essence’ means, but the failure to measure the full set of ca

    I don’t know what ‘essence’ means, but the failure to measure the full set of capital (cherry picking), and the violation of reciprocity is endemic. IOW, Aggregations(Correlations) vs Operations(Causations) to obscure measurement of capital transfers. I can’t be wrong.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 18:15:56 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020009356274864128

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020001034574258176

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1020001034574258176

  • My answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive?

    My answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive? https://www.quora.com/From-whence-do-you-belive-your-rights-as-a-human-being-derive/answer/Curt-Doolittle?srid=u4Qv

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 03:24:02 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019784902340902912

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link. My answer to From whence do you belive your rights

    Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    My answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-19 03:24:02 UTC

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status. IT’S SIMPLE: LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, RECIPRO

    Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    IT’S SIMPLE: LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, RECIPROCITY

    The Constitution defines how the government (production of commons) is organized.

    The bill of rights defines the law that may not be discovered, legislation and regulation that may not be passed.

    The constitution does try to implement natural law (life, liberty, property), but it does not state such concretely in the bill of rights, nor does it state the law of reciprocity despite the fact that reciprocity is the basis for germanic common law back into pre-history.

    We could quite easily reorganize the constitution life(existence), liberty(action), property(thing), and reciprocity (volition), and then tie every one of the articles and amendments back to these (reciprocity and three dimensions of its demonstration).

    This set of three rights (existence, action, possession) and the single law of reciprocity are very simple criteria by which any constitution can be strictly constructed.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 23:37:06 UTC

  • answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive?

    https://t.co/40D3aSEemLhttps://t.co/40D3aSEemLMy answer to From whence do you belive your rights, as a human being, derive?

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 23:24:00 UTC

  • It’s Simple: Life, Liberty, Property, Reciprocity

    The Constitution defines how the government (production of commons) is organized. The bill of rights defines the law that may not be discovered, legislation and regulation that may not be passed. The constitution does try to implement natural law (life, liberty, property), but it does not state such concretely in the bill of rights, nor does it state the law of reciprocity despite the fact that reciprocity is the basis for germanic common law back into pre-history. We could quite easily reorganize the constitution life(existence), liberty(action), property(thing), and reciprocity (volition), and then tie every one of the articles and amendments back to these (reciprocity and three dimensions of its demonstration). This set of three rights (existence, action, possession) and the single law of reciprocity are very simple criteria by which any constitution can be strictly constructed.

  • It’s Simple: Life, Liberty, Property, Reciprocity

    The Constitution defines how the government (production of commons) is organized. The bill of rights defines the law that may not be discovered, legislation and regulation that may not be passed. The constitution does try to implement natural law (life, liberty, property), but it does not state such concretely in the bill of rights, nor does it state the law of reciprocity despite the fact that reciprocity is the basis for germanic common law back into pre-history. We could quite easily reorganize the constitution life(existence), liberty(action), property(thing), and reciprocity (volition), and then tie every one of the articles and amendments back to these (reciprocity and three dimensions of its demonstration). This set of three rights (existence, action, possession) and the single law of reciprocity are very simple criteria by which any constitution can be strictly constructed.

  • IT’S SIMPLE: LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, RECIPROCITY The Constitution defines how t

    IT’S SIMPLE: LIFE, LIBERTY, PROPERTY, RECIPROCITY

    The Constitution defines how the government (production of commons) is organized.

    The bill of rights defines the law that may not be discovered, legislation and regulation that may not be passed.

    The constitution does try to implement natural law (life, liberty, property), but it does not state such concretely in the bill of rights, nor does it state the law of reciprocity despite the fact that reciprocity is the basis for germanic common law back into pre-history.

    We could quite easily reorganize the constitution life(existence), liberty(action), property(thing), and reciprocity (volition), and then tie every one of the articles and amendments back to these (reciprocity and three dimensions of its demonstration).

    This set of three rights (existence, action, possession) and the single law of reciprocity are very simple criteria by which any constitution can be strictly constructed.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 19:37:00 UTC

  • I teach natural law (Reciprocity). I’m asking followers to construct an argument

    I teach natural law (Reciprocity). I’m asking followers to construct an argument that is difficult.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-07-18 17:34:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019636617571700737

    Reply addressees: @IgnatiusBalliol

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019635617012113413

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1019635617012113413

  • Natural Law Facism = Market Fascism

    That is (a) universal, (b) nationalist, (c) reciprocity (d) forcing markets in everything, (e) free of imposition of costs directly or indirectly, (f) and extreme intolerance for the opposites: internationalism, irreciprocity, discretionary rule over common and private. I’ve gone “full fash”. In the sense of militaristic, expansionist, zero tolerance for anything other than sovereignty, reciprocity, truth, duty, and markets in everything.