Curt Doolittle

Theme: Reciprocity

  • THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not i

    THE NATURAL LAW ON THE SEXES, HOMOSEXUALITY, GAY MARRIAGE, PEDOPHILIA (but not incest)

    (repost from March 2018)

    (Note: I write using essay (discussion), argument, and law forms. This is argument form. The law form would include slightly more rigorous outlining, dimensional tests, limits, restitutions and punishments. But the argument would not change.)

    —“Curt: How should the (ideal) relationship between homosexuals and society exist or be constructed, to make homosexuals experience of society be the best it can be, while also making society’s experience of homosexuals be the best it can be? There are a lot of mixed messages out there… and you actually make sense and can justify why you make sense. I would appreciate your comment.”—

    Ok, Here is a rough outline of the argument in natural law:

    GIVEN

    1) As far as I know homosexuality is a non-rare in utero developmental disorder. I suspect this current scientific hypothesis to survive – although we might discover the cause is or is not an immune system reaction to testosterone (which it appears to be), and we may discover that it can be limited by natal treatments in the future – it does run in families.

    2) If you read enough of my work, you’ll encounter the hypothesis that humans are not only able to adapt intellectually and emotionally to changes but that we can create very different distributions of traits in populations using very small variations in endocrine expression. We can express these by stresses and by selection. The male-vs female physical, and male-vs-female reward systems, and male vs female brain structures included in those distributions.

    3) It is unclear whether or not the ability to produce homosexuals of either gender is a necessary consequence of our ability to produce those distributions. And secondly, whether or not the result is harmful or not. (apparently not). the reason being that there is *greater value in productivity in service of reproduction than reproduction*.

    4) It is unclear how much of homosexuality is produced in utero, in early development, and in late development. My understanding at present, is that many sexual identity disorders can occur during development without sufficient physical exercise, and sufficient role play by either gender. (And that is before we account for the hormones in the modern chemical environment.)

    AND WHEREAS

    That we incrementally demonstrate our fitness (non parasitism, and productive contribution) by:

    1) Forgoing crimes both private and public.

    2) Demonstrate payment for the franchise by continuous military/militial/sheriff service.

    3) Demonstrating worthiness by self sufficiency by productive contribution, thereby forgoing free riding and parasitism

    4) Demonstrate worthiness to the intergenerational polity by marriage and family and the support thereof.

    5) Demonstrate worthiness to productivity by the voluntary organization of business and industry.

    7) Demonstrate worthiness to the polity by organization of the finance, industry, business, trade, and labor in a territory.

    8) Demonstrate worthiness by the correct adjudication of disputes between in and out group members under the natural law of reciprocity.

    AND WHEREAS

    1) That the family is the first demonstration of organizational capacity upon which the intergenerational family is dependent.

    2) That families are a costly but necessary contribution to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity.

    3) That families must work tirelessly to insulate generations from consumptive and hedonistic interests and behaviors.

    4) That individuals who do not serve, do not produce families, do not produce businesses or industries, do not manage territories, or do not adjudicate differences under the natural law of property, are at best not harmful, and if engaged in criminal or free riding or parasitic activities are a a dead weight loss to the family, clan, tribe, nation, and polity.

    THEREFORE

    1) Homosexuality is a birth defect, and not voluntary. Women are less sexually dedicated than males. Trauma in women especially can cause homosexuality at any point in life.

    2) Anything that occurs between adults in private is a voluntary exchange between them and nothing else.

    3) Anything that occurs in public (speech/sound, sight/display, or behavior/action) imposes an involuntary cost upon others.

    4) Any speech, display, or action that is contrary to the preservation of the intergenerational investment in the commons, and in particular conspicuous hedonism or conspicuous consumption is damaging to the informational commons, and damaging to those who pay higher costs within it.

    5) Marriage is a contract for corporation between a man, a woman, and the polity, for the intergeneration production of offspring, and reciprocal care, and reciprocal insurance. However, this contract consists almost entirely of (a)a transfer of all personal property to community property, (c) a reciprocal grant of power of attorney. (d) reciprocal ownership of offspring until the age of maturity. (e) an implied but unenforced insurance against hardship, infirmity, and old age. This corporation dramatically reduces the cost of household production and maintenance. Without this relationship household costs rise disproportionately and therefore standards of living drop accordingly. (as we have seen)

    6) Natural Reproduction and parenting by individual homosexuals by whatever means, and by pairs of homosexuals by whatever means, is difficult to argue with, however any suggestion or influence by such parents that their children’s gender is flexible, that male and female minds and bodies are not different, and that male and female roles in family and society are not necessary, must be prosecuted as a developmental crime on the scale of any other child abuse or torture.

    7) Public displays of affection in furtherance of paying the high cost of reproductive persistence, training an intergenerational family, and ensuring that families can produce intra and intergenerational insurance of one another rewards those that so contribute.

    8) Public displays of non-reproductive affection shall be limited to those that are demonstrated between heterosexual members of the same sex.

    9) Under no condition shall heterosexual and homosexual males be forced into one another’s company. Homosexual males are unfit for military participation by virtue of a birth defect that may hinder trust.

    10) Prosecution of homosexual hedonism in any public form shall be vigorous such that it is entirely suppressed. (ie: no more of this public bathroom nonsense and drug use.)

    CLOSING

    In other words, the low temporal investment of homosexuals must be removed from visibility in the commons so that there is every incentives for the high intertemporal investment in families.

    The direction of homosexual relations to the construction of families despite the extraordinary fragility of such families due to the fragility of homosexual relationships, and suppression of public hedonism has proven a successfully means of both reducing public hostility to homosexual behavior and increased the positive signaling behavior of homosexuals.

    SPECIAL TREATMENT

    the only special treatment we must give to any behavior in society is that which perpetuates investment in the high cost of producing high investment families. The age of individualism has been a catastrophe for the very reason it was intended to be: to destroy the influence of intergenerational middle and upper middle class families. Just as the ancient attack on the aristocracy was an attack on intergenerational aristocracy.

    (The Ten Planks were available for all to see.)

    —MORE—

    NATURAL LAW ON GENDER

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/06/02/natural-law-on-gender/

    TWO GENDERS, MANY DISORDERS

    https://propertarianism.com/2017/09/14/two-genders-many-disorders/

    NATURAL LAW ON PEDOPHILLIA

    https://www.facebook.com/curt.doolittle/posts/10157059209177264

    GAY MARRIAGE

    https://propertarianism.com/2013/05/31/why-are-gay-people-asking-for-the-right-to-marry-if-it-is-legal-stuff-they-are-asking-for-cant-they-go-to-some-separate-setup-for-partners/

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-20 09:28:00 UTC

  • FAITH IN MY FELLOW MAN TO PREFER A MORAL LAW I have sufficient faith in the aver

    FAITH IN MY FELLOW MAN TO PREFER A MORAL LAW

    I have sufficient faith in the average man that he will prefer to work a little at understanding an absolutely positively moral law closed to abuse and deceit and manipulation, to the existing order of immoral law that he cannot learn, makes little sense, and provides less justice. 😉

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 18:00:00 UTC

  • “You come up with these pronouncements (and label them “natural law”) as if they

    —“You come up with these pronouncements (and label them “natural law”) as if they were objective laws of the universe requiring no further debate. Seriously, death by fire?”—Dennis Spain

    Thats because you haven’t walked thru one of my arguments and tried to refute it.

    Everyone tries to make general criticisms. But very few people throw CASES at me. And cases TEST theories. So go ahead and try.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:47:00 UTC

  • There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The r

    There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The rest is proportionality. And it is an endemic cognitive bias by which we conflate the two.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:16:45 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108054714858393601

  • ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA –“I’d like to see you make a post on

    ON REQUEST: THE NATUAL LAW ON PEDOPHELLIA

    –“I’d like to see you make a post on pædophilia. You smash every issue and I think this deserves attention. It’s not a waste of your time if you’re educating the whole following, not just me.”—

    Thanks for asking. This isn’t really a difficult question. And I might have to edit this abit for additional clarity, but here it is:

    –The Judgement of Natural Law on Paedophilla.–

    WHEREAS

    1. Definition

    … a) A paraphilia: Paraphilia is the experience of intense sexual arousal to atypical objects, situations, fantasies, behaviors, or individuals. Such attraction may be labeled sexual fetishism. No consensus has been found for any precise border between unusual sexual interests and paraphilic ones. There is debate over which, if any, of the paraphilias should be listed in diagnostic manuals, such as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders or the International Classification of Diseases.

    … b) Pedophillia is a psychiatric disorder in which an adult or older adolescent experiences a primary or exclusive sexual attraction to prepubescent children. Although girls typically begin the process of puberty at age 10 or 11, and boys at age 11 or 12, criteria for pedophilia extend the cut-off point for pre-pubescence to age 13. A person who is diagnosed with pedophilia must be at least 16 years old, and at least five years older than the prepubescent child, for the attraction to be diagnosed as pedophilia.

    The criteria therefore is:

    … i) obsessive or exclusive interest

    … ii) in those under 13 years of age, and or the degree of development we attribute to those under 13 years of age.

    … iii) by those 16 years of age or older

    … iv) and at least five years older.

    2. Limits

    These are NOT evidence of pedophilia:

    … a) photos of nude babies or children in one’s own family as documentation of the beauty of life.

    … b) There is a long standing artistic tradition in western civilization of the nude form including that of the young. The difference between beauty, innocence, and virginity (promise of future fertility) and sexuality (opportunity in the present for consumption) is not a difficult one to judge by triangulation with traditional works of art. If there is a question there is no question.

    … b) taking care of one’s own kin’s hygiene or taking one’s own kin to public toilets or changing rooms or other private places as is required of all of us. The conflation of male and female responsibilities in these matters has not helped us because it exposes ordinary men to unwarranted risk of false accusation.

    … c) protecting, disciplining, educating, praising, talking to, amusing, or playing with children – which may include physical contact.

    … d) incest – incest is a different crime – one of availability.

    … e) natural experimentation between pubescents.

    … f) natural aesthetic attraction to the beauty of those who are fertile if not yet fully mature enough to make rational decisions regarding the commitments of reproduction and offspring.

    … g) As a general rule male female ratio of Male Age, then divided by two, then add seven, produces limits to non-coercieve relationships from 14 onward. Below 14, more than one year of difference is outside the limit.

    3. Evidence

    … a) consumption of child pornography

    … b) obsession in attention, speech, collection

    … b) molestation

    … c) co-morbidity

    … … deficits in response inhibition,

    … … smaller stature, left handedness, frontal development.

    … … failed lateralization (ie: the’re feminine)

    … … personality disorders (increase risk of acting)

    4. Causes

    “Brain Damage.” Current understanding is an in-utero attack on fetus and fetal proteins – particularly male – which prohibit development, giving more miscarriages, birth to lighter weight and smaller offspring. (CD: future research will undoubtedly show that this process is far more vast in affect than just sexual development. I have seen no and expect to see no, variation on this general theme other than mother’s genetic predisposition to produce this immune response.)

    … a) in-utero developmental defects (Potential)

    … b) developmental trauma (Trigger)

    … c) brain trauma (Trigger)

    5. Incurability

    The defect is incurable because the developmental phase of the brain cannot be recreated. It is possible to use CBT to train certain low risk individuals but even this evidence is limited. (Important:) The individual lacks executive function necessary to suppress the underdeveloped and obsessive urges.

    AND WHEREAS;

    … a) Non-Reciprocal – violates voluntary reciprocity

    … b) Harmful – violates imposition of harm

    … d) Externality – produces vast externalities

    … d) UnRestitutable – restitution is impossible

    … e) Unstoppable – violates demand for cessation, placing the burden on the court:

    … … Because the Law must:

    … … … Provide restitution

    … … … Provide punishment

    … … … Prevent repetition or expansion

    THEREFORE;

    It is the judgment of the law that:

    1. Pedophilia is an incurable defect, not disease.

    2. Pedophiliacs cause harm closed to restitution

    3. To those incapable of self defense,

    4. And unable to engage in reciprocity,

    5. Producing extraordinary (Vast) externalities for parental behavior in defense of children which increases with transportation rates, anonymity, and population density.

    AND THEREFORE;

    Pedophiles who signal risk, by:

    … a) manifesting obsessive risk behaviors (watching, stalking, talking)

    … b) possession of, use of, or creation of, child pornography

    … c) molestation

    … d) association with one another

    … e) conspiracy to engage in any of the above

    Shall be permanently removed from the population by:

    … i) death by burning for molestation

    … i) death by hanging for all other violations

    … ii) permanent, irrevocable isolation in hard labor prisons (camps)

    And;

    Whereas;

    … i) no judge nor jury nor polity may warranty the others in society from this harm;

    Therefore;

    … i) no legislation or regulation of finding of law may circumvent this natural law whether in in act or consequence.

    … ii) and any who speak of, propose, author, or adjudicate such shall be held liable for consequence.

    AND WHEREAS, CONVERSELY ;

    1. false accusation is:

    … a) harmful to the accused

    … b) exposes the accused to risk of death

    … c) produces vast externalities whether or not true

    … d) is closed to restitution

    THEREFORE

    … a) the court shall use harshest possible publishment in the punishment of false accusers, and the highest possible restitution. ensuring that the false accuser’s quality of life is reduced to half that of the falsely accused.

    –This is the Law–

    –March 19, 2019–

    –COMMENTS–

    by James Fox Higgins

    The beauty of this piece of law is that:

    Anyone with a mild perversion but some retention of agency will NOT commit the crime, because the punishment dis-incentivises it so severely.

    So those who DO harm children in this manner are literally doing it because they have NO agency or self-control, which makes them, by definition, an uncontrollable cost to society.

    If they recognise their own lack of agency, they can turn themselves in and serve the community from isolation. If not… feel the flames.

    —

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:16:00 UTC

  • “Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    —“Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    That is one of those sentences you have to contemplate to fully appreciate. Well done.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 17:15:22 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1108054367502913536

  • There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The r

    There is only one existentially possible equality and that is reciprocity. The rest is proportionality. And it is an endemic cognitive bias by which we conflate the two.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:16:00 UTC

  • “Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    —“Calculating for reciprocity is superior to intuiting an ideal.”—Brandon Hayes

    That is one of those sentences you have to contemplate to fully appreciate. Well done.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 13:15:00 UTC

  • BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT by Brandon Hayes I’m under the impression and u

    BETTER THAN I COULD HAVE SAID IT

    by Brandon Hayes

    I’m under the impression and understand the beauty of P to be this: by removing personal subjectivity (asymmetric preference) from human interaction [by subjecting it to P law; replacing it with calculation] Emotions and meaning are properly solved for (via the best plausible outcome). This is because P solves for the optimal interaction (cooperation; reciprocity).

    P says (calculates, proves) what’s false (wrong); thus to be avoided OR bad (immoral unethical) to be punished (or left undone). By, removing, punishing and limiting the bad. ALL possibilities to GOOD are opened [and taken more often as we close doors to the “bad”].

    It leaves preference and decisions about pursuits to HUMANS (hence P can’t be done by AI and is resistant to take-over). Only humans can make the calculations P suggests.

    People seem to think P must say more than it does about the way things are or ought to be; but the brilliance of P is its parsimony.

    — CURTD —

    Correct. And this is the problem i face, the law faces, and science faces. We say only that which is false. It is up to those others to decide, from that options remain, what is GOOD and not FALSE. So for those with great psychological, emotional, intellectual, and material, agency for whom adaptation to any given ‘good’ is relatively easy does little for the vast majority for whom movement with a herd of similar interests is their only available means of survival.

    If I must PROPOSE a religious structure (I will do so) as a rough outline for others to create upon, then I will. But even doing that is merely ADVICE. That is different from math (measurement) science (falsification), and law (truth). The narrative will and must forever be a means of unifying behind an hypothesis of the good.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-03-19 11:24:00 UTC

  • Civil War: Enforcement: Threats, Charges, and Duties (“The Black Pages”)

    Enforcement

    Threats, Charges, and Duties

    “Violence is neither good nor bad – it is a resource put to ends good or bad. Violence to obtain self determination by sovereignty, reciprocity, and testimony, in concert with physical natural and evolutionary laws, against a tide of civilizationcide, culturecide, ethnocide, and genocide, is a necessary, virtuous and heroic end.”

    Introduction

    While our demands are just, such demands lack weight unless accompanied by threats, promises, and the conviction to follow, keep, and act upon them. Therefore we promise the following:

    Our Goal

    We have only one goal.  That is to demand the military:
    1. Prevent a Civil War
    2. Declare martial law
    3. Vacate the House, and Senate
    4. Vacate the Governments of the Rebellious cities
    5. Seize assets of hostile parties
    6. Install this constitution
    7. Enact its articles and policies.
    8. Return control of the government to the states.
    ( Counsel: The military will have no option, since the alternative will be incapacity to act either in foreign or domestic theatres, resulting in fighting wars on all fronts in an era under which it cannot possibly do so. In other words, we will force a controlled contraction under military guidance in furtherance of this constitution or an uncontrolled contraction in resistance to it. ) Strategy Our traditional way of war our traditional demand for reformation Weakness “Never has an empire been more fragile” Tactics “Silence, Darkness, Immobility, Hunger, and Cold” Cessation “Attrition Warfare Within a Polity, Once Started, Gains Momentum”

    Threats

    Means and Methods of War

    (…)

    Charges and Duties

    Our Direction to Our People

    1 – Restoration of Free Truthful Speech. 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: Free Speech Is Restored: … Political Speech shall constitute Protected Speech. … Liability for suppression of political speech is enacted. … No one may Prevent, Censor, Deny, Protest,  Criticize the use of, Shame, Rally, Psychologize, Moralize, Demonize, Shout Down Political Speech, or “Doxx” (search for and publish private or identifying information), Threaten or Terminate employment, contract or agreement. … Heads of organizations, employees, vendors shareholders, are equally responsible for defense of political speech and offense or insult has no bearing. 2 – Liability for the Suppression of Truthful speech is enacted. 3 – Liability for Defamation by Falsehood is restored. 4 – Liability for harm by falsehood or irreciprocity to the informational commons is enacted. 5 – All citizens have the obligation to use law enforcement, violence, or extrajudicial punishment to enforce these liabilities under the Restoration of Free Truthful Speech. 2 – Revocation of Tolerance for Separatism 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: All symbols of non-integration to and separatism from European culture or Natural Law, Constitution and Institutions, including competition to Christian and Pagan religions, are prohibited, including religious, cultural, and political dress, symbols, signs, displays, language. 2 – Use Zero Tolerance: All public gatherings in celebration or reinforcement of any separatist display, word, or deed are prohibited. 3 – Use Zero Tolerance: All evangelism of or argumentative defense of any separatist display, word, or deed, is prohibited. 4 – And all citizens have the obligation and right to use law enforcement, violence, or extrajudicial punishment to enforce intolerance for separatism, and non-integration. 3 – Restoration of Citizen’s Defense of Private and Commons. 1 – Use Zero Tolerance: Carry arms if you have them, at all times, and be prepared to use them at all times. 2 – Use Zero Tolerance: “Shoot First, and Shoot To Kill” in the cases of Intentionally Blocking Roads or Walkways, Stalking, Aggression, Threatening, Violence, Trespass, Porch Pirating, Robbery, Looting and Rioting. 3 – Use Zero Tolerance: Threaten, Confront. Arrest, Bind, and Contain or Kill if necessary, anyone in your neighborhood, not living in your neighborhood, or without documented commercial requirement to service a customer in your neighborhood. 4 – Reward for fighting to install this constitution 1 – The family of anyone who fights shall receive no less than $8,000 per month, within the first seven days of the month, from their current bank, direct from the central bank, from the treasury, for the duration of the fight. 2 – Anyone who joins and fights in the first thirty days lives tax-free for life. 3 – Anyone who joins and fights in the first thirty days receives a $250,000 one time payment from the Treasury at the end of the fight. 4 – Anyone who fights keeps whatever loot obtained from any opposition during the fighting. 5 – Anyone in the treasury and banking system that fails this duty, or abandons his post, office or job shall be summarily expelled from the nation. Anyone who resists the fulfillment of this demand shall be summarily executed. 5 – (behavior toward police, fire, emergency, politicians, celebrities)

    Our Direction to Our Officers Soldiers, Sheriffs, and Police

    ( … ) Borders shall be closed Immigration and naturalization halted.

    Our Direction to First Responders

    ( … ) Our Direction to Politicians, Bureaucrats and Dependents ( … ) You keep as long as you do not interfere. Otherwise, you lose, and you lose your life.

    Regarding Willing Accomplices

    A Threat to Employers of Conspirators (subsidy for automation) Only in case of immediate reporting and termination: If you cannot automate, and cannot find employees, then you may declare bankruptcy, the State will absorb your debts, and you may receive 60% of your salary for 10 years in compensation, in addition to the constitutional redistributions. If we discover even one post 1964 immigrants in your employment, your assets and your life are forfeit, and you will be subject to summary execution. Whereas (remember for 10000 years), end the dark age of Semitism for eternity. Therefore;

    Regarding Agents of The Enemies

    (21 days to exit with anything you can carry, or execution on sight ) Miscegenation The positioning of white men Anti White Speech, display or deed. ( … ) Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc… deplatforming. Soros Southern Poverty Law Center New York Times

    Regarding Enemies

    Given that Men of moral mind must possess direct instruction free of interpretation when engaged in acts of prosecution, restitution, and punishment by violence; we charge the Men among our People with the following Duties during the process of transition: Whereas there exists no possible claim under the Natural Law by which to resist the Declaration, Constitution, and this Warranty; Therefore;

    Regarding Compliance:

    Questions for assistance in compliance are necessary. And all possible assistance shall be given to those willing to comply, and those who engage in the methods of our enemies by baiting, entrapment, or fraud of honest people shall be punished as traitors. Regarding Exit: ( … ) Must be provided exit.  Forcible repatriation. ( … ) Regarding Resistance: Whereas questions for assistance in compliance are necessary, resistance is not. Therefore any and all counter-signaling, counter-argument, resistance, and anything other than immediate obedience shall require summary execution by strangling or hanging; or in the case of physical resistance, any means at the posse’s disposal. Any organized resistance shall require summary execution of three generations of the relations of that individual in every direction. (Counsel: The purpose of familial punishment is to force the families to take responsibility for the actions of their members, thus reducing the burden on the Men. Under The Law, everyone is forever responsible for defending the People against one’s kin for three generations in every direction.  The history of man is one of some family members taking unnatural actions on the behalf of their relations without punishment of the relations for benefiting from the crime. As such, every family member is responsible for the actions of every other. ) Regarding Defection: Defectors and Traitors shall be shot, beheaded, hung, crucified, burned, or impaled. Leaders shall be killed. Followers may convert, lose their franchise, forfeit their property, and pay the taxation, or leave, or die. Having claimed conversion and recanted to any degree, they shall be prosecuted as defectors and traitors.  All who interfere shall be prosecuted as defectors and traitors and shot, beheaded, hung, crucified, burned, or impaled. Regarding Enemy Shareholder Property ( … ) Regarding Financial Institutions Regarding The Fine Arts Any fine furniture, arts and artifacts of any other than Muslim or Jewish origin must be preserved and delivered to museums, libraries, or post offices, under penalty of Death by Treason.

    Regarding Others

    Our Appeals to Enemies of Our Mutual Enemy

    ( … )

    Our Promise to Others

    ( … )

    Canada

    Australia

    Britain

    Europe

    Russia

    India

    China

    Africa

    World Reaction

    —“if Your Goals Are Realized in The Us, What (do You Believe) Would Be the Effect on Global Hegemony? Is This Speculation Worthwhile?”—

    Yes, Speculation Is Worthwhile Because External Effect Is Part of The Desired Outcome. Let’s Assume One of Four Initial Reactions: 1 – External Actors Will Become More Confident in World Affairs and More Critical of Us Activity in The World. 2 – External Actors Will Support the Activity of Activists 3 – External Actors Will Seize Opportunities for Political Expansion of Influence. 4 – External Actors Will Seize Opportunities for Military Expansion of Influence. The Degree of Change in The World Will Be Dependent upon Those Actions and The Outcome of A Revolutionary Change: 1 – Acquiescence by The State and Restoration of The Powers of The States. 2 – Continuing Declining Low-Level Civil Warfare and Related Economic Decline 3 – A Significant Uprising that Forces the Military to Enact Martial Law . 4 – A Significant Uprising that Forces the Military to Call Troops from Abroad to American Soil. By and large the balance of powers will be restored, and either way, America will return to a domestic rather than imperial power. Since everyone knows this, particularly the upper levels of the military, the objective (my objective) is to make a revolutionary outcome so certain that the government merely meets our demands for devolution to the states. It is hard to object to my proposal other than out of job defense or collusion with the world’s globalist movement. We will own the blue water navy for a long time to come. We will lose and want to lose our responsibility for defending Europe. That will force Germany and Russia to work together and end our conflict. China much like Russia operates entirely for its domestic market. The USA operates for its globalist market. We just need to restore the balance of powers and then we can all focus on the only remaining enemy to the world: Judaism-Islam. What Will the Rest of The World Do? African states will resist the forcible repatriation of Africans. India will resist the forcible Repatriation of Indians. Mexico will resist the forcible repatriation of South Americans. The Muslim States will resist the forcible repatriation of Muslims Israel may or may not resist the forcible repatriation of Jews. The world will seek historical equilibrium in their spheres of influence, and the military will have to return to the continent rather than protecting Europe, thereby forcing Europe and Russia and eastern Europe into their historical alliance (Christendom). The outlier is the UK and if at all possible, it would be preferable to restore the British empire as the alliance of English speaking peoples. Incentives are relatively obvious at this point. We are the pin that holds the world together. But nuclear arms are what they are. The expected result is acceleration of what everyone in every think tank in the world suggests: The return to normal across the world.