THE ORIGINAL SAFE SPACE: TRUTH
Western Science, Reason, Reciprocity: The original Safe Space – safe from parasites, morons, whiners, crybabies, and virtue signalers.
—James Santagata
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:35:49 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576432688693743
IN PROPERTARIANISM, SOCIOLOGY = COMPATIBILISM
You see, in Propertarianism, we deal in a inequality, inequality of interests, compatibilism, and compromise, through exchange between genders and classes, rather than trying to define ideals or utopias. Why? Ideals and utopias are just scams we use to coerce others into your interests against theirs, without engaging in trade.
We are wealthy enough for the feminine reproductive strategy of the underclasses, and the masculine strategy of the aristocratic classes, to separate, form new polities, new governments, and to return to the speciation we pursued prior to the european unification of the world in the age of sale, trade, industry, technology, science, finance, and law.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:33:53 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576425050609084
RECIPROCITY: WE WILL BURN IT INTO THE STONE OF HISTORY SO THAT YOUR IRRECIPROCITY NEVER OCCURS AGAIN.
—“There are no laws of nature. Irreciprocity is not a law of nature. How do you explain the implacable irreciprocity of a consuming black hole”—
(Yes, I realize this is too stupid for words, but let’s use it as a vehicle for an important lesson on the Natural Law of Cooperation: Reciprocity, which is an extension of the Law of Nature: Entropy, Naturalism, Realism.)
The physical world equilibrates (Entropy). It does not engage in reciprocity. The reason being it cannot choose to cooperate or not.
Humans can choose always to (a) evade, (b) cooperate with, (c) prey upon, one another.
Because of this ability we can (a)obtain the benefits of cooperation, (b) prey upon one another if we cannot, and (c) avoid those who would defeat us if we cannot survive the conflict.
But because we have these wonderful things called memories we can also engage in credit and debt relations, presuming that minor ir-reciprocities accumulate in reciprocity. And we willingly participate in the production of commons within the limits of proportionality.
But because we can be easily deceived, by abrahamic prose, with false promises of credit or debit, reward or punishment, then we can also cheat one another – fooling some people some of the time, for a short time, and many people most of the time for a long time – and everything in between.
This is why we demonstrate altruistic punishment: we punish irreciprocity, and disproportionality, and we do so no matter the cost, no matter how high the cost, because the possibility of a cheater amongst our midst the imitation of whom would lead to collapse of cooperation and the returns on cooperation is untenable for any cooperative (social) population.
What do you think the means of retaliation for attempted genocide, politicide culture-cide, civlization-cide will be?
Because you do not get to CHOOSE the value other people attach to race, nation, clan and kin, or political order, or civilizational or strategy for dragging mankind out of ignorance, poverty, mysticism, disease, hard labor, and dysgenia.
There is only a common good until there isn’t.
There isn’t
So separate or war.
I prefer war.
Because I want to make certain that we burn it into the stone of history SO that your irreciprocity never occurs again.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 15:10:27 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576332903223785
THE ULTIMATE RECIPROCITY.
A woman can choose to kill an innocent baby because it will impose costs upon her because of her reproductive strategy – as mother of a child; but a man cannot choose to punish or kill a guilty person for the costs he imposes upon him because of his reproductive strategy: the long term survivability of the polity.
Reciprocity. Termination is a right for all or it is not a right.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:58:17 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576285103428859
IT’S NOT HATE, ITS POLICING, PROSECUTING, PUNISHING, AND RESTITUTION
—“And yr so political bravo . Morons are always looking for excuses to justify hate. Who gives a shit about political status of two killers. Boy bye”–Sandy C @s_cala
You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.
So, you’re a parasite, a liar, and a fraud, attempting to destroy that which our ancestors risked the anglo scottish enlightenment, the english civil war, and the revolutionary war, to construct, and which generations died to persist. you want socialism. To end the third way.
But it won’t happen. Because very soon we’re going to turn this simmering festering civil war into Politicide, not ethnocide. Nothing racist to it. Everything political. And it will be the most just bloody war in history for that reason.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-07 14:53:10 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102576265006546834
You misrepresent criticism of your destruction of western civilization, rule of law of sovereignty and reciprocity, the american experiment in a third way – commercial cooperative rather than political or religious with the nuclear family as the purpose of policy – as hate.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 23:12:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158878474075066368
Reply addressees: @s_cala
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158866579863560199
So where you begin your Pilpul: those weren’t western examples; Conflated nationalism with individualism. You stated western “individualism” instead of individual SOVEREIGNTY, Reciprocity, High Trust, and specialization in production of the Commons and high returns therefrom.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 15:09:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158756945173581824
Reply addressees: @jtlevy @Mattzwolinski
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mirror? Nationalists are the defenders of their genome, their kin, the commons ad institutions that persist them across generations. Hong Kong to exit Europeans; India Muslims; Europe Jews and Muslims.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@jtlevy @Mattzwolinski Did you have to practice that little bit of Pilpul and Critique in front of a mirror? Nationalists are the defenders of their genome, their kin, the commons ad institutions that persist them across generations. Hong Kong to exit Europeans; India Muslims; Europe Jews and Muslims.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158755544510926849
@Diomedes
“Weapons exist so that people like us can prevent people like you from ending our civilization and its invention of sovereignty, reciprocity, rule of law, universal standing, the nuclear family and the demand for marriage and self sufficiency prior to reproduction, so that your costs are not born by others at the expense of their children, kin, and generations.
In other words, weapons exist so that we can put you down when we need to. That is the origin of anglo civilization. And it is why we will persist.
By putting you down.”
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-06 14:58:33 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/102570623822640651
(FYI: conservatism includes a high disgust response, and there are irrational people. However, as a matter of Natural Law, preference is preference, and it’s voluntary exchange, and as such sanctioned under the law.)
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 23:08:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158515238603501568
Reply addressees: @theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158514314246049797
IN REPLY TO:
Unknown author
@theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays All we care about is rule of law, by reciprocity, in display word and deed. You fit in just fine. Excellence and heroism. Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity. Judge and Jury, Family and Commons, Markets in Everything. Can’t choose your sex. pref. Can choose all above.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158514314246049797
IN REPLY TO:
@curtdoolittle
@theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays All we care about is rule of law, by reciprocity, in display word and deed. You fit in just fine. Excellence and heroism. Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity. Judge and Jury, Family and Commons, Markets in Everything. Can’t choose your sex. pref. Can choose all above.
Original post: https://x.com/i/web/status/1158514314246049797
All we care about is rule of law, by reciprocity, in display word and deed. You fit in just fine. Excellence and heroism. Truth and Duty, Sovereignty and Reciprocity. Judge and Jury, Family and Commons, Markets in Everything. Can’t choose your sex. pref. Can choose all above.
Source date (UTC): 2019-08-05 23:05:11 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158514314246049797
Reply addressees: @theThiagoCortes @JohnMarkSays
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158511109126496257
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1158511109126496257