The Choice Episode 0003 – Q&A: Catholicism, Christianity, Trifunctionalism, and Natural Law
https://youtu.be/0VDux3Cl4oU
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 19:42:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250147425504899085
The Choice Episode 0003 – Q&A: Catholicism, Christianity, Trifunctionalism, and Natural Law
https://youtu.be/0VDux3Cl4oU
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 19:42:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250147425504899085
enumerate those rights and define sufficient food, and enumerate what they are required to do in exchange and you have a constitution. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-14 15:53:04 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1250089699819094016
Reply addressees: @eruditenights
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249776466365009927
Every man a sheriff: Heroism&Excellence, Truth&Duty, Sovereignty&Reciprocity, Regardless of Cost. https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1249365466038112257
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-12 16:11:27 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1249369549734064129
https://twitter.com/curtdoolittle/status/1249365466038112257
Learning P
Focus on:
(a) The west’s group strategy of a universal militia, sovreignty, reciprocity, markets and natural law.
(b) Our P-amendments to the constitution to restore the constitution, our way of life, and western civlization.
(c) the basics of reciprocity and testimony
(d) How to understand and defeat the sophisms and deceits.
Everything else is technical.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-12 14:33:00 UTC
SEE? P-LAW WORKS FOR BOTH GENDERS. 😉
—“P law makes young ladies think I am the master dating coach who can help them from being defrauded by parasites and by MGTOW pickup artists”—Maria Al Masani Makienko
CD: That’s gotta be my favorite quote from a female yet. 😉
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 14:51:00 UTC
“LEARN RECIPROCITY. THE REST IS JUST ITERATIVE. “
—“Reciprocity is the bottom line. Once you get that, I think most of the rest is iterative.”—William Wallace
Sage advice on learning P.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 14:43:00 UTC
THE LIES
The Lies: “I reject, I disapprove, I disagree, I’m wary, I don’t believe, or engaging in ridicule, shaming, moralizing or psychologizing.”
None of these are a form of reciprocity: an argument – they’re counter-signaling in lieu of argument. And lacking argument because of one’s ignorance or incompetence. And cowardice in admission of one’s ignorance or incompetence.
An intellectually honest man does not counter signal like a woman, but either seeks to understand by asking questions, or posits a counter proposition that is open to equal criticism. counter signaling is a violation of reciprocity – a pretense of knowledge when one has none.
You have only THREE intellectually honest propositions:
… 1. Refutation.
… 2. Competition.
… 3. Question.
Or the female (dishonest)
… 4. Disapproval by counter signaling
One cannot disapprove of a truth only a preference.
The female cannot use force, or necessarily physically cooperate, or even use organized force or competition, but she can deprive men of sex, affection, care, and advocacy, and engage in counter signaling, or undermining, and rally other women to counter signal, and undermine. That is their weapon of competition of necessity. It is the means by which the females CREATE MARKET DEMAND for men to SATISFY THEM in exchange for sex, affection, care, advocacy and perhaps most importantly, abstinence from undermining you and those you cooperate with.
This is why, if not one family one vote, then men and women require different houses, and both the legal prohibition on male violence, as well as the legal prohibition on female avoidance of argument, undermining, and reputation destruction so that both genders are reduced as are all others in the marketplace to cooperation by voluntary exchanges.
Which was the point of marriage and one family one vote – and one of the principle means by which women’s natural irreciprocity and social superpredation was let loose from the pandora’s box of enfranchisement without equal legal suppression of the female means of superpredation that we had evolved in legal suppression of the man’s means of superpredation.
We are not consious of the causes of our behavior.
Which is what I seek to cure.
And which will restore us to reciprocity.
And end the conflict.
And force us back into markets.
-Cheers
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-11 12:27:00 UTC
THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW – ON THE LEFT
0. Reciprocity is the only reason for both sides to refrain from predation, parasitism, or boycott – cooperation or the option to cooperate is more valuable than non-cooperation, and the prevention of future cooperation.
1. We create reciprocity via negativa by not imposing costs on others demonstrated interests
2. The name we use for Demonstrated interests is property.
3. In P-Law we use property in toto as the definition of property, meaning the empirical evidence of what demonstrated interests people defend.
4. We are all dependent upon the informational commons for information.
5. Some of us will defend the informational commons (or any commons) from other’s abuse of it. Some will not.
6. When you make a truth claim to others, or others make a truth claim to you, the person making the claim can, if he errs, biases, justifies, or deceives, violates reciprocity with the audience (what we call unethical), causes you to harm the informational commons as a consequence (by externality), and if he makes that claim in public, harms the informational commons as well, and therefore violates reciprocity in the commons (what we call immorality).
7. P-Law provides a definition of truth, and the means of falsifying (testing) statements for truthfulness by tests of testifiable, consistency, operational possibility, correspondence, rationality, reciprocity, completeness, full accounting, and possibility of warranty, and possibility of restitution upon error or deceit.
8. Marxism, neo-marxism (cultural marxism), postmodernism, feminism, and hbd-denialism, are all attempts at deception by:
(a) claiming european self determination (sovereignty, reciprocity), tripartism (military, legal-commercial), and religious(family-faithful), mediated by law, and limiting us to markets, so that we preserve natural selection by demonstrated behavior, and devoting the proceeds to the production of commons, thereby maintaining the health,prosperity, and wealth of the people, and their competitive advantage is oppression, when all other peoples that did not do so were mired in poverty and suffering.
(b) that the solution was communism, or socialism, that would end our natural selection, our prosperity, and our competitive advantage, and our ability to drag mankind out of ignorance, superstition, poverty, hard labor, starvation, disease, suffering, and victimization by nature – when all civilizations that have tried any form of equality have died.
(c) that to bring about communism, socialism, and the reversal of evolutionary transcendence, it was necessary to undermine our civlization at every level.
Monopoly statism to undermine our tripartism.
Atheism to undermine our tripartism.
Anti-militarism to undermine our tripartism.
Anti-rule of law to undermine not only our tripartism but the means by which we resolved disputes between the classes.
Marxism to undermine the markets and cooperation between the classes.
Cultural Marxism to undermine our culture, values, myths, traditions, and arts.
Feminism to undermine the family as the compromise between the genders given our different reproductive strategies and biological differences.
Postmodernism to undermine our ability to use social pressure to force conformity into realism, naturalism, operationalism, reciprocity, truthful speech, and defense of the commons so that it was optimu for the production of high trust citizenry; and again,postmodernism to deny the existence of truth or truthful speech – when truthful speech is the primary reason for not only our high trust society but our ‘european means of sense-making’ that made empiricism our laws, democratic participation, our science, medicine, and technology, possible.
Postmodernism to use language for any purpose by which to obtain political power – abandoning all need for consistency, correspondence, rationality and liability.
Political correctness to undermine the truth of the substantial differences between our advanced, neotenic, genetically, informationally, normatively, culturally, traditionally, and institutional superior people, so that they can be conquered quietly and slowly.
Using immigration to reverse our darwinian history.
Using frailty in our law and democracy to capture our territory and institutions.
Using the academy to indoctrinate two generations of marxist-postmodernist-feminist-HBD-denialist “Priests and Priestesses” to indoctrinate our children by manufacturing their ignorance, feminizing our males, and making obese both genders.
That’s only part of what they’ve done. I’ve just run out of tolerance for listing their crimes.
JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW
If the informational, normative, traditional, and institutional commons is common property of a people, then the (((anti-western left))) is an organized crime syndicate invading and conquering from within, in violation of the Westphalian peace. And as such these people are prosecutable for war crimes, and we shall have our restitution.
Source date (UTC): 2020-04-09 23:02:00 UTC
The Choice – Episode 0003 – Q&A: Catholicism, Christianity, Trifunctionalism, and Natural Law.
(Audio: download) ( Script: +E0003 )
By answering these questions i try to illustrate the relationship between natural law, christianity and our people. Indirectly, you’ll gain insight into the theology that I’ve been working on, and how it promotes christianity via negativa. And it provides insight on how to update christianity so that it is re-masculinized, and sustainable. I don’t know if including the questions here is valuable. They are just vehicles for explaining the ideas, so – enjoy. There is a lot of food for thought in here. -cheers.
The Choice – Episode 0003 – Q&A: Catholicism, Christianity, Trifunctionalism, and Natural Law.
(Audio: download) ( Script: +E0003 )
By answering these questions i try to illustrate the relationship between natural law, christianity and our people. Indirectly, you’ll gain insight into the theology that I’ve been working on, and how it promotes christianity via negativa. And it provides insight on how to update christianity so that it is re-masculinized, and sustainable. I don’t know if including the questions here is valuable. They are just vehicles for explaining the ideas, so – enjoy. There is a lot of food for thought in here. -cheers.