Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Theme: Reciprocity
-
Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism)
-
Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism)
Again, the way to show abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism, denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 22:09:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282436977556586496
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282436673658392577
-
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort to the female technique of lying by Pilpul, Critique, GSRRM. 😉
And I have three ex wives, three kids and am a 1%er.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary -
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort
I’m still waiting for you to falsify the test of Reciprocity rather than resort to the female technique of lying by Pilpul, Critique, GSRRM. 😉
And I have three ex wives, three kids and am a 1%er.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 22:08:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282436659699765249
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282435849855139841
-
You didn’t answer that question. Falsify reciprocity. (natural law)
You didn’t answer that question. Falsify reciprocity. (natural law)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 21:52:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282432570366595073
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282428541842448384
-
You didn’t answer that question. Falsify reciprocity. (natural law)
You didn’t answer that question. Falsify reciprocity. (natural law)
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 -
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc Formal law: Logics, Grammars,
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc
Formal law: Logics, Grammars, Algorithms
Natural law: Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.
Evolutionary Law: Natural Selection in defense against regression to the mean.
They’re the same law – and it doesn’t change
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 21:37:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282428853328187393
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282424444544327685
-
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc Formal law: Logics, Grammars,
Physical law: Entropy, Conservation of Energy, etc
Formal law: Logics, Grammars, Algorithms
Natural law: Reciprocity within the limits of proportionality.
Evolutionary Law: Natural Selection in defense against regression to the mean.
They’re the same law – and it doesn’t change
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 -
Ok. Falsify Reciprocity. Tell me what other reason a competitor has not to conqu
Ok. Falsify Reciprocity. Tell me what other reason a competitor has not to conquer, kill, pillage, enslave, enserf, tax farm, credit farm, displace, and replace you? Why shouldn’t the smart strong fast aristocratic minority replace you?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 21:33:37 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282427920858910726
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282424444544327685
-
Ok. Falsify Reciprocity. Tell me what other reason a competitor has not to conqu
Ok. Falsify Reciprocity. Tell me what other reason a competitor has not to conquer, kill, pillage, enslave, enserf, tax farm, credit farm, displace, and replace you? Why shouldn’t the smart strong fast aristocratic minority replace you?
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420