Propertarianism FAQs How to Punish Parasites FOR PROFIT and more
https://youtu.be/JYNwNKlXWts
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 13:29:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284117952187572224
Propertarianism FAQs How to Punish Parasites FOR PROFIT and more
https://youtu.be/JYNwNKlXWts
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 13:29:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1284117952187572224
PASSING THROUGH THE FIRST GREAT FILTER
Discovering, adapting to, and applying the Physical laws of nature is empirically and logically best for everyone.
Adapting to and applying Rule of law of natural law is empirically and logically best for everyone.
A Monarchical government, with a professional cabinet, with a jury (senate, house) to ascend or veto proposals is empirically and logically the best government under rule of law.
An Ethnonationalist state because of minimum social, economic, and political competition is empirically and logically the best for everyone.
Cooperation and Trade Between Rule of Law, Constitutional Monarchical, Ethnoationalist States is best for everyone.
The purpose of Abrahamic religion, pseudoscience, and sophistry is to destroy eugenic kinship identity and replace it with dysgenic magical identity.
The purpose of Abrahamic religion, pseudoscience, and sophistry is to use the underclasses and the less developed peoples to destroy the more developed peoples.
The Europeans alone maintained separation, identity, truth before face, and discovery and conformity to physical natural and evolutionary laws.
The Chinese forcibly integrate which is why they endure, but could not tolerate truth before face, and failed to pass through the first great filter – although they are adopting western technology an science and it may be possible going forward.
The Hindus used castes to limit integration and failed to pass through the first great filter.
Everyone else failed catastrophically to pass through the first great filter and either stagnated or devolved by dysgenia.
The most influential action any people can take is to force integration into compatibility with physical, natural, and evolutionary laws, to prevent underclass immigration, and to pay the underclasses to have either one or no children (and to punish them if they do). y
The great lies of the Abrahamic ancient world and the Abrahamic 19th and 20th centuries are revolts against the physical, natural, and evolutionary laws: the great lie that we can end natural selection by preventing regression to the mean.
It will never, ever, ever, end. EVER.
The Truth is Enough.
No More Lies.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-17 10:34:00 UTC
Natural law of reciprocity? Some other ‘natural law’? Because reciprocity requires truth before face. And Christianity demands faith before truth in defense of face.
Reply addressees: @VictorF45280237
Natural law of reciprocity? Some other ‘natural law’? Because reciprocity requires truth before face. And Christianity demands faith before truth in defense of face.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 20:42:21 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283139793795395585
Reply addressees: @VictorF45280237
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283136479703769088
Its the fate of all moral falsehoods. Reciprocity in-display word and deed, is pretty clear – and it’s also universal.
What is required of one before he can claim to ”be” a christian? Are there any general rules among all the sects?
Reply addressees: @VictorF45280237
Its the fate of all moral falsehoods. Reciprocity in-display word and deed, is pretty clear – and it’s also universal.
What is required of one before he can claim to ”be” a christian? Are there any general rules among all the sects?
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-14 20:39:36 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283139103890997260
Reply addressees: @VictorF45280237
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1283137019841937409
It is falsifiable, find any rational choice that is irreciprocal. It’s possible. You can’t.
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 22:12:16 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282437646879461382
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282437208562114560
It is falsifiable, find any rational choice that is irreciprocal. It’s possible. You can’t.
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420 @RadSecretary
Again, the way to show Abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism,denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
(All that is required is sufficient force to make conflict intolerable)
Source date (UTC): 2020-07-12 22:11:12 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282437378083368960
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1282436937534627841
Again, the way to show Abrahamists (theology, pseudoscience, sophism,denialism) is to return to the central argument and demonstrate they fear it: falsify reciprocity as an immutable law of logic and nature.
(All that is required is sufficient force to make conflict intolerable)
Reply addressees: @SARMseller420