UTOPIA VIA NEGATIVA
Man is not smart enough, and never will be, to pursue any theoretical ideal. We can only eliminate ignorance error, bias, deciet, and irreciprocity, producing agency, knowledge, and control of energy, until we produce the only POSSIBLE utopia -via negativa.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-23 17:31:22 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105940299445093460
RT @NoahRevoy: @tannerguzy Easy, just need to do 4 things:
1) Follow natural law.
2) Form a trifunctional hierarchy.
3) Promote strong i…
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-15 23:27:52 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1371604088400531464
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason. Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” like “True For Me” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and “Rationality”, like “True“(testifiable), is absolute (a complete set) like Physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set). We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy? This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason.
Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
-Curt, you bring up an unresolved dilemma for me: Would it not be more accurate to say “pure feminine sensemaking” is not rational, reciprocal or loyal?-WalterIII
“Sense-making” is relative (a subset) like metaphysics, and rationality is absolute (a complete set) like physics. This is a problem with ambiguity of the term ‘rational’ dependent on context. Their behavior is rational – for women(subset). It is not rational for a polity(set).
We face a similar problem with philosophy: Personal, Social (interpersonal), Political(scale), or scientific (complete) philosophy?
This is why I work on disambiguation so that we know what ‘general rule’ we are talking about. Unfortunately “rationality(capacity), rational(subset), rational(set), rationalism(method) and Logic and Logical” are conflated – just as ‘truth’ is.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:34:50 UTC
Original post: https://gab.com/curtd/posts/105871893527054988
Reciprocity. In order to compensate for your abuse of context, the opposition uses the same technique. This is the general trend of degeneration of western discourse, as the left leads the cycle downward and the right is forced to follow.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:06:13 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370028292875632641
Reply addressees: @PureGonzo_ @Nigel_Farage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370019107710656518
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason.
Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:04:26 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370027844911259649
Reply addressees: @Nigel_Farage
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370009510824337412
Under P-Law, proposing or advocating the use of the state (legislation) for irreciprocity, is a crime – a third-degree treason.
Women are not rational, reciprocal, or loyal creatures. They are driven by extreme intolerance for uncertainty and as such drive civs to collapse.
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 15:04:05 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370027756566716426
Reply addressees: @juniorwolf @GoodDudes2020
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1370014596950601734
RT @LukeWeinhagen: @curtdoolittle Masculine fascism, meritorious and reciprocal, aims all of society at elevating the best that society has…
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-11 00:02:00 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369800737581117446
RT @StevePender: @ThruTheHayes @curtdoolittle @jgreenhall Been thinking about varying reciprocity time horizons, how it seems related to ti…
Source date (UTC): 2021-03-10 20:40:34 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1369750046078550022