Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • You don’t see our men trying to undo rule of law, property, marriage, and interg

    You don’t see our men trying to undo rule of law, property, marriage, and intergenerational exchange.

    You do see our women doing it.

    What does that tell you?

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-05 07:52:00 UTC

  • OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES The Outline of Propertarianism a

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/propertarian-posts-by-chapter/AN OVERVIEW OF PROPERTARIANISM FOR SERIOUS NEWBIES

    The Outline of Propertarianism as posts organized by chapter. This is only useful at this point to scan and get a sense of the structure of the argument. But you’re a smart guy and it might bear glancing.

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/propertarian-posts-by-chapter/

    CENTRAL ARGUMENT

    That the combination of the european civil war to contain germany was a catastrophe for the west in that it cast doubt upon the western (aristocratic) order just as the thirty years war had cast doubt upon the prior (religious) order. That the cosmopolitans started producing as the enlightenment change rolled across eastern europe. And that just as the anglos(empiricsts/Locke-Smith-Hume-Jefferson), french(moralists/Rousseau) and germans (rationalists/kant) had attempted to restate their group evolutionary strategy in modern terms, so did the jews(pseudoscience/lying) as a universal moral strategy. Women freed from labor under the industrial revolution used these arguments to reform slavery, and claim men were their enemies and oppressors.

    Once the slaves were freed, the women also demanded equal representation, and within one generation after obtaining it used ‘the great lies’ of the cosmopolitans to undermine the western order further, creating a century of pseudoscience, the destruction of the church, the destruction of the family, and the conquest of academy, state and media by women’s interests (r-selection), because women dispose of more of the earned income than do men in all these areas. Women are great consumers and it is profitable to serve them – even when they are spending down five thousand years of accumulated cultural and genetic capital. Postwar jews immigrating to the United states attacked and took over the academy and media just as they had used the pulpit in the ancient era, and the printing press in the prior era, to spread their second great lie of pseudoscience in every field of human social order.

    The reason being quite simple: consumption of the commons (predation on the weak.) Jews continued their parasitism and non-production of commons (which is why they could not hold Judea) by expanding into every field where parasitism, propaganda, pseudoscience, and deceit were possible (partly the result of denial of property). This is not a conspiracy as much as the combination of genetic superiority at verbalism, genetic bias toward the parasitic strategies and separatism, rational self interest, and cultural training duplicity provided by talmudic study and jewish history.

    So armed with this knowledge how do we reverse the century of propaganda, lies, and pseudoscience of the alliance between the jews, women and minorities, and return the west its lost confidence, and restore the civilization’s strategy of truth+commons?

    By stating in rational and scientific terms the reason for the west’s rapid success in the ancient and modern periods, despite its many disadvantages. The west practiced aristocratic egalitarianism (a form of eugenics at scale), but this strategy was never written down, only handed down.

    I’m writing it down. Forever. Truth was enough to create the west, and it is enough to restore the west.

    FOR MISES:

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/scientific.praxeology/permalink/750994611656577/

    FOR ROTHBARD

    The Minimum Basis for Law (Nomocracy)

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/02/propertarianism-vs-rothbardiansm/

    Fallacies

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/06/20/rendering-rothbardian-fallacies-intellectually-embarrassing-and-argumentatively-impossible/

    A Lot More On Rothbard’s Low Trust Ghetto Ethics.

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/?s=ghetto+ethics

    WHY IT MATTERS

    But you can’t really understand why truthfulness, non-parasitism, and morality matter without also understanding The Secret of the West, and Testimonial Truth.

    The North Sea Peoples: Hanseatic Civilization

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2014/02/15/on-the-north-sea-peoples/

    A VERY SHORT COURSE IN DECIDABILITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/30/a-very-short-course-in-decidability/

    A SHORT COURSE IN TESTIMONIAL TRUTH

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/28/a-short-course-on-propertarianisms-testimonial-truth/

    THE DUE DILIGENCE NECESSARY FOR A WARRANTY OF TRUTHFULNESS

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/04/due-diligence-necessary-for-the-warranty-of-truthfulness/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN MORALITY

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/07/27/a-short-course-in-propertarian-morality-2/

    A SHORT COURSE IN PROPERTARIAN REASONING

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/09/26/a-short-course-in-propertarian-reasoning/

    THE EVOLUTION OF SUPPRESSION VIA COMMON LAW

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/10/the-evolution-of-suppression/

    1000 WORDS THAT CAPTURE IT ALL

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/05/19/the-most-profound-1000-words-you-can-read-on-political-philosophy-today/

    THE CURE FOR PROPAGANDA (LYING) AND WESTERN CIVILIZATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/01/18/the-cure-for-propaganda-and-western-civilization/

    THE END OF HISTORY IS NOT DEMOCRACY BUT THE TRUTHFUL CIVILIZATION

    http://www.propertarianism.com/en_US/2015/06/06/the-end-of-history-the-truthful-civilization-sorry-francis/

    There is much, much more online. But this is enough to keep you (or anyone else for that matter) busy for quite a while.

    Curt

    Source date (UTC): 2016-01-05 03:57:00 UTC

  • Q&A: —“Curt, what are commons in the framework of propertarianism? How are the

    Q&A: —“Curt, what are commons in the framework of propertarianism? How are they constructed, and what advantages do they confer?”—

    Property: that which I bear costs to obtain without imposing cost upon that which others have born costs to obtain.

    Shareholder Property: That which I have born cost to obtain an interest in without imposing costs upon that which others have born costs to obtain an interest, but which I may not privatize, wherein the property ownership is articulated, and non-transferrable without group permission.

    Common property: That which I have born cost to obtain an interest in without imposing costs upon that which others have born costs to obtain an interest, but which I may not privatize, wherein the property ownership is weakly articulated and is transferrable through reproduction to one’s offspring and mates.

    Property en toto: referring to that which people demonstrate acting to obtain without imposing costs upon that which others have acted to obtain, and for which they demonstrate retaliation for imposition of costs upon. This includes but is not limited to: life, kin, mates, physical, normative, traditional, and institutional assets.

    Positive/Negative Costs: While some physical assets are purchased through direct payment (positive costs), some assets are purchased through indirect payment that we call ‘restraint’ or ‘deprivation’ or ‘forgone opportunity for consumption’ (negative costs).

    Homesteading of Opportunities produced by the commons is permissible (competition), but transfer of assets already homesteaded requires productive, fully informed, warrantied, voluntary transfer, free of imposition of costs upon the property en toto of others by externality.

    THE LOGICAL INVERSION

    As people congregate and develop normative institutions they are able to develop increasingly dense common property which in turn produces lower cost opportunities.

    “we are not wealthier than cave men, we have made all goods and services infinitely cheaper through cooperation in a division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor and advocacy.”

    Hence collections of people create discounts on opportunities (time) which are then open to identification (experimentation) and homesteading (transformation), into private property, which may then be consumed, inventoried, or invested in the commons.

    Getting one’s head around the fact that we improve rates of everything in time, and that we cannot know truth only falsehoods, and that we pay for commons both directly via payment or indirectly by forgone opportunities is a sort of inversion of the way we look at history. So it may seem counter intuitive at first until we grasp that time is our only existential asset and that the division of labor eliminates switching costs in exchange for increased productivity. And that the principle value of population density is the cheapness with which opportunities are constructed. And that the principle value of property rights is to reduce transaction costs in the process of production that we call cooperation in a division of labor.

    Curt Doolittle

    The Propertarian Institute

    Kiev, Ukraine.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-31 12:54:00 UTC

  • So what if all Immigrants must (a) buy insurance that they will be financially i

    So what if all Immigrants must

    (a) buy insurance that they will be financially independent (and the insurer must return them if they fail).

    (b) take ‘the oath’ of non-theft.

    (c) cannot vote for until the fourth generation (why we should vote at all I don’t know).

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-27 08:55:00 UTC

  • The Silver Rule: Cooperation. The Golden Rule: Buying Options On Cooperation

    [T]HE SILVER RULE IS THE ORIGIN OF COOPERATION THEFT The only ‘shame’ is theft. The only oath, not to lie, cheat, steal or impose harm. The summary of this ethic is: “Do not unto others as you would not want done unto you.” The anglo saxons were right and the Christians wrong. MORALITY (RULE OF COOPERATION) The silver rule is necessary for cooperation. The golden rule buys options on future cooperation – but encourages parasitism. ACQUIRE We act upon that which we have acquired without imposition of costs upon that which others have acquired by doing the same. COOPERATE We act in concert to voluntarily produce common goods and services. WARRANTY We warranty the truthfulness of our speech by due diligence in the cleansing of error, bias, imagination, wishful thinking, and deceit from our speech. INSURE We insure one another against the imposition of costs by collective suppression of free riding by collective prosecution of those who impose costs upon others. INVEST We invest in the construction of commons for the production of returns, and we deny one another the ability to impose costs upon them. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • The Silver Rule: Cooperation. The Golden Rule: Buying Options On Cooperation

    [T]HE SILVER RULE IS THE ORIGIN OF COOPERATION THEFT The only ‘shame’ is theft. The only oath, not to lie, cheat, steal or impose harm. The summary of this ethic is: “Do not unto others as you would not want done unto you.” The anglo saxons were right and the Christians wrong. MORALITY (RULE OF COOPERATION) The silver rule is necessary for cooperation. The golden rule buys options on future cooperation – but encourages parasitism. ACQUIRE We act upon that which we have acquired without imposition of costs upon that which others have acquired by doing the same. COOPERATE We act in concert to voluntarily produce common goods and services. WARRANTY We warranty the truthfulness of our speech by due diligence in the cleansing of error, bias, imagination, wishful thinking, and deceit from our speech. INSURE We insure one another against the imposition of costs by collective suppression of free riding by collective prosecution of those who impose costs upon others. INVEST We invest in the construction of commons for the production of returns, and we deny one another the ability to impose costs upon them. Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • PROPERTARIAN CLASS STRUCTURES (draft)(note that education is a commercial class)

    PROPERTARIAN CLASS STRUCTURES

    (draft)(note that education is a commercial class)

    Martial Class (suppression of parasitism)

    —Kings and Generals

    —Knights(professionals), Soldiers

    —Judges, and Sherriffs

    Commons Class (Construction of Commons)

    —Infrastructure Institutions

    —Civic Organizations

    —Beauty and Maintenance

    —Disaster Services

    Insurer Class (Insurance)

    —Priesthood and Intellectuals

    —Insurers, and Insurers of last resort

    —Medicine and Nursing

    —Mothering and Child Care

    —Elder Care

    —Poor Care

    Commercial Class (organization and execution of production)

    —Major Corporate Alliances

    —Finance, Banking

    —Business and Entrepreneurship

    —Distribution and Trade

    Producer Classes

    —Calculators

    ——Scientists (discover)

    ——Engineers (build)

    ——Programmers (instruct)

    ——Accountants (measure)

    ——Project Managers (time)

    —Artist Class

    …

    —Labor Class

    …

    —Dependent Class (incapable of engaging in goods and service production)

    …

    —Out of Sight Class (incapable of engaging in commons production)

    …

    Criminal Class (forcing costs on commons and production)

    …

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-22 04:57:00 UTC

  • “Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from whi

    —“Just as law is discovered, and that we need only a small set of axioms from which all others an be derived; amongst which are natural law, rule of law, and property rights – do we obfuscate gods in that we start with a near-infinite variety the further we go back in time; almost with one distinct God for each miraculously varying pattern; and as we understand more about power structures and humanity, the more we reduce the Godly behaviors into the individual and reduce the amount of gods to believe in, until, finally we have the individual.”— Johannes Meixner

    (That is how great minds find patterns of similarity between previously dissimilar concepts. Awesome. )

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-21 12:46:00 UTC

  • THE GREAT PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC DECEIT: PSYCHOLOGIZING Once you learn propertarianism

    THE GREAT PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC DECEIT: PSYCHOLOGIZING

    Once you learn propertarianism’s basic principles: acquisition, property en toto, inventory, transaction cost, opportunity cost, cooperation, suppression of free riding, reproductive strategy and group evolutionary strategy, and all speech as negotiation for acquisition… you replace totalitarian Freudian psychology and cosmopolitan sociology with universal amoral, unloaded, rational incentives.

    And when you do that you see all psychologism get as a vast language of deception and manipulation for encouraging parasitism and consumption.

    Humanity like all other creatures exists in the physical universe, and has evolved the means of estimating the future and acting to change it, capturing the difference for his benefit.

    The only ‘shame’ is theft.

    The only oath, not to steal.

    Source date (UTC): 2015-12-20 05:42:00 UTC

  • The Evolution Of Human Regulation

    [E]VOLUTION OF METHODS OF REGULATION 1) RELIGION – threat of ostracization. (culture) 2) LAW – threat of punishment, loss of property or liberty. (state) 3) CREDIT – threat of loss of consumption. (suppliers) 4) SOFTWARE – threat of loss of opportunity. (friends) Religion records your birth, promises, and deaths. Law produces a history of your infractions. Credit records a history of your impulsivity Software records a history of your non-conformity. You are always at the mercy of your neighbors. But every time population increases and with it anonymity, we develop a new means of constructing reputations in oder to ensure conformity. (Fuk. And, I’m working at bringing it about… I’m gonna join the Mr Robot Society. )