Most people in the legal profession do not in fact practice law, but legislation.
This is the central problem of all law.
Man can make contracts.
He can only discover law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 07:02:00 UTC
Most people in the legal profession do not in fact practice law, but legislation.
This is the central problem of all law.
Man can make contracts.
He can only discover law.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 07:02:00 UTC
The plasticity of resources and the subjective value of property and the first-user problem all made social science harder to discover than physical science despite our ability to subjectively test human actions and inability to subjectively test the physical universe at other than human scale.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 06:26:00 UTC
CORRECT ANSWER
These rights we can observe humans demonstrate:
Constituo (homesteading / creation)
Transitus (crossing)
Observo (observation)
Usus (use of 3d space)
Fructus (consume the fruits of)
Mancipio (sale and transfer)
Abusus (destruction / conversion)
When we say ‘ownership’ we mean some subset of these properties. The limit on ownership is externalities. In other words, your use of a thing cannot harm another.
In almost no cases to we grant Abusus to land, water, air, knowledge, art, monument, norm and tradition. Even under slavery you can rarely kill a slave. Why? Because these things create externalities that affect others.
So most of the time when people say their ownership is limited, it is not the property that is limited but the consequences of use of that property.
All creatures that can move and remember tend to create and defend property: that which they have expended effort to acquire.
Property rights however are a product of organized cooperation. The purpose of property RIGHTS is this:
To reduce transaction costs in determining use. (reduce conflict)
To eliminate rent seeking from efforts at creating productivity.
To provide incentives to those who have local knowledge to make use of it in the service of others, through production and trade.
To provide constant punishment to free riders who are ever-present.
In other words, to create cooperation at scale in a division of labor in which none can seek rents and all must earn returns.
In order to accelerate consumption we borrow. In order to borrow others retain an interest. You are generally prohibited from Abusus, and your Mancipio is limited. And if you fail to pay off the lender you will gain back your rights of Mancipio. But rarely Abusus.
At all times you possess some subset of rights. in very few cases do you posssess all rights.
The current intellectual debate is whether it makes any sense at all to charge interest on home loans since this seems to be one of the the primary causes of inflation. Worse, it is such an important part of the american economy that most economists feel terror at the thought of interfering with it.
To say that the american economy is a house of cards, for this reason, is not too far off. Our primary source of wealth and our primary industry for two hundred years has been selling off the continent that we conquered to new generations and new immigrants.
This is our dirty little secret of how the american way of life is really funded.
https://www.quora.com/Do-we-really-own-anything-in-a-capitalist-society
CORRECT ANSWER
These rights we can observe humans demonstrate:
Constituo (homesteading / creation)
Transitus (crossing)
Observo (observation)
Usus (use of 3d space)
Fructus (consume the fruits of)
Mancipio (sale and transfer)
Abusus (destruction / conversion)
When we say ‘ownership’ we mean some subset of these properties. The limit on ownership is externalities. In other words, your use of a thing cannot harm another.
In almost no cases to we grant Abusus to land, water, air, knowledge, art, monument, norm and tradition. Even under slavery you can rarely kill a slave. Why? Because these things create externalities that affect others.
So most of the time when people say their ownership is limited, it is not the property that is limited but the consequences of use of that property.
All creatures that can move and remember tend to create and defend property: that which they have expended effort to acquire.
Property rights however are a product of organized cooperation. The purpose of property RIGHTS is this:
To reduce transaction costs in determining use. (reduce conflict)
To eliminate rent seeking from efforts at creating productivity.
To provide incentives to those who have local knowledge to make use of it in the service of others, through production and trade.
To provide constant punishment to free riders who are ever-present.
In other words, to create cooperation at scale in a division of labor in which none can seek rents and all must earn returns.
In order to accelerate consumption we borrow. In order to borrow others retain an interest. You are generally prohibited from Abusus, and your Mancipio is limited. And if you fail to pay off the lender you will gain back your rights of Mancipio. But rarely Abusus.
At all times you possess some subset of rights. in very few cases do you posssess all rights.
The current intellectual debate is whether it makes any sense at all to charge interest on home loans since this seems to be one of the the primary causes of inflation. Worse, it is such an important part of the american economy that most economists feel terror at the thought of interfering with it.
To say that the american economy is a house of cards, for this reason, is not too far off. Our primary source of wealth and our primary industry for two hundred years has been selling off the continent that we conquered to new generations and new immigrants.
This is our dirty little secret of how the american way of life is really funded.
https://www.quora.com/Do-we-really-own-anything-in-a-capitalist-society
Women were more difficult to domesticate than men. We did it through property rights and marriage. Voting=Pandora.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 09:59:19 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710405143523622913
Reply addressees: @DemsRRealRacist
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488
IN REPLY TO:
@JBurtonXP
I can cite no more conclusive proof of Trump being a liberal than that my colleagues and I seem completely powerless to thwart his agenda.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/709961829116735488
No interest on consumer purchases (consumption) for the duration of the warranty.
Esp. no interest on home and land loans for principle residence.
Linear interest / Principle payments.
All liquidity distributed directly to consumers by debit card.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-17 02:05:00 UTC
We allowed people to profit from degeneracy rather than prohibiting profit by other’s labors.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 08:03:51 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710013698509807616
Reply addressees: @CanadaNRx @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992
Yep. We financed perversion and our own ridicule by the grant of copyright, rather than creative commons
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 08:03:20 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710013568134070272
Reply addressees: @CanadaNRx @ne0colonial
Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992
IN REPLY TO:
Original post on X
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710012868985556992
Patents as off-book investment in high risk invention are a discreet tool in those cases where the market won’t do. Not a general strategy.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:53:09 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710011005586313216
Copyright protection has financed immorality. Creative commons protects creativity enough. Copyright must end. And with it decadent arts.
Source date (UTC): 2016-03-16 07:44:14 UTC
Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/710008762157961216