Theme: Property

  • You cannot experience the economic benefits of Natural Law, Common Law, Universa

    You cannot experience the economic benefits of Natural Law, Common Law, Universal Standing, Rule of Law (Universal applicability), Testimonial Truth, Testimony, Jury, Property, Money, Credit, Interest, the Sacred Natural Commons(public behavior), The Sacred Grove (park), the Militia and Chivalry, high trust, and the nuclear family, without having all of them.

    This is the cult of our people: Natural Law: truth in all things. Testimony.

    Sharia Law, Jewish Law, Byzantine and Asiatic Decree, are incompatible with Natural Law (science) from which our western “goods” are created.

    There is but one law of man, just as there is but one law of physical science.

    All else is error, bias, wishful thinking, obscurantism, suggestion, and deceit: FRAUD.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-25 04:47:00 UTC

  • Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud

    Otherwise it’s just an excuse for theft by elaborate fraud.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 10:46:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953853780615169

    Reply addressees: @mattyglesias

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712953313889751040

  • Every involuntary transfer is a lost opportunity for mutually beneficial trade

    Every involuntary transfer is a lost opportunity for mutually beneficial trade.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-24 07:14:58 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712900499566108672

    Reply addressees: @pmarca @subyroy

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968


    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/712850980971347968

  • To join the partnership, you must take the ancient oath in its modern form: I sh

    To join the partnership, you must take the ancient oath in its modern form:

    I shall not steal from mind, body, property or the commons.

    I shall impose no cost upon the mind, body, property, or commons of others.

    I shall take only that which is paid for by productive, fully informed, voluntary exchange, and that imposes no cost upon others.

    I shall defend, prosecute and war against all who lie, cheat, steal or harm.

    I shall safeguard the commons, poor, the weak and the helpless, as I judge I am able.

    I shall teach right and wrong as I am able.

    I shall improve beauty when and where I am able.

    I shall speak the truth even if it means my death.

    This is my oath.

    I pray you kill me if I break it.

    I warn you that I shall kill you if you break yours.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-22 05:42:00 UTC

  • bitcoin is and can only be a fractional share of stock in a network that has onl

    …bitcoin is and can only be a fractional share of stock in a network that has only momentum value.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:59 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711533998447726592

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608


    IN REPLY TO:

    @bierlingm

    @curtdoolittle why not? I agree it’s not the panacea some take it to be.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608

  • false positioning. While the invention of a blockchain produces a method of a pu

    false positioning. While the invention of a blockchain produces a method of a public ledger for the record of titles….


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 12:44:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711533891232931840

    Reply addressees: @bierlingm

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608


    IN REPLY TO:

    @bierlingm

    @curtdoolittle why not? I agree it’s not the panacea some take it to be.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/711532797941444608

  • Men have been domesticating each other since we first cooperated to take down an

    Men have been domesticating each other since we first cooperated to take down an alpha.

    It took a second great leap: property, to domesticate women.

    And in one century they have undone ten thousand years of our labor.

    Women are unconscious pandoras. A threat to civilization.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-20 11:15:00 UTC

  • The Corrected History Of Civilization: Paternalism as Domestication

    (by Eli Harman) [A]dvanced civilization, with production and division of labor, is necessarily founded on property, which is a masculine innovation, the more private, the more masculine. Property is that which you obtain and maintain at personal cost, and that which you are willing and able to defend. Property rights are a subset of that property that your peers are willing to ensure, just as law is a subset of morality. Males evolved to specialize in the production of violence which sustains all property claims (and supply even the violence necessary to sustain communal forms of property in pre-civilized, matriarchal, societies.) Patriarchy and private property originate in bands of men organized for aggressive conquest, and the subsequent necessity of dividing the spoils of conquest (land, goods, and women) between them, organizing them for production, and defending them henceforth. Once unleashed on the world, patriarchal civilization proved unstoppable. And its advantages, in productivity, including but not limited to the production of violence, have only snowballed over time with the accumulation of capital and eugenic reproduction (made possible by restraining females’ dysgenic, egalitarian, tendencies.) Recent innovations to the contrary, which are really just regressive throwbacks to the paleolithic, were only made possible because one patriarchal society, Western civilization, attained such a commanding lead over adversaries and antagonists, that our forefathers thought they could afford to indulge their women without limit. And for a while, we could. But the madness has gone exponential, and a century and a half of unchecked consumption and decay wrought by faulty egalitarian premises have brought our enemies, once more, near enough to parity that they may begin punishing us for our folly. We will learn. Or we will die. But things will not continue as they were. Eli Harman.

  • The Corrected History Of Civilization: Paternalism as Domestication

    (by Eli Harman) [A]dvanced civilization, with production and division of labor, is necessarily founded on property, which is a masculine innovation, the more private, the more masculine. Property is that which you obtain and maintain at personal cost, and that which you are willing and able to defend. Property rights are a subset of that property that your peers are willing to ensure, just as law is a subset of morality. Males evolved to specialize in the production of violence which sustains all property claims (and supply even the violence necessary to sustain communal forms of property in pre-civilized, matriarchal, societies.) Patriarchy and private property originate in bands of men organized for aggressive conquest, and the subsequent necessity of dividing the spoils of conquest (land, goods, and women) between them, organizing them for production, and defending them henceforth. Once unleashed on the world, patriarchal civilization proved unstoppable. And its advantages, in productivity, including but not limited to the production of violence, have only snowballed over time with the accumulation of capital and eugenic reproduction (made possible by restraining females’ dysgenic, egalitarian, tendencies.) Recent innovations to the contrary, which are really just regressive throwbacks to the paleolithic, were only made possible because one patriarchal society, Western civilization, attained such a commanding lead over adversaries and antagonists, that our forefathers thought they could afford to indulge their women without limit. And for a while, we could. But the madness has gone exponential, and a century and a half of unchecked consumption and decay wrought by faulty egalitarian premises have brought our enemies, once more, near enough to parity that they may begin punishing us for our folly. We will learn. Or we will die. But things will not continue as they were. Eli Harman.

  • NONSENSE: “WHAT IS LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM?” Like “meritocratic communism” it is e

    https://www.quora.com/What-is-libertarian-communism/answer/Curt-Doolittle?share=086db11fQUORA NONSENSE: “WHAT IS LIBERTARIAN COMMUNISM?”

    Like “meritocratic communism” it is either an impossibility, **o****r**** a lie**.

    Most likely **a lie** to cover an impossibility. Most such lies are created in order to perpetuate fraud by political means by making false moral appeals in an effort to avoid exchanging behavioral limitations for material rewards.

    **Libertarianism:** universal individual ownership of property, and voluntarily constructed commons.

    **Socialism:** Universal state ownership of property, and the involuntarily constructed commons, where bureaucratic or authoritarian leaders determine the assignments of work and the distribution of proceeds from the work – (which usually don’t end up existing) Socialism is a failed experiment.

    **Mixed economy:** Involuntary organization of the production of commons using representatives who appropriate the proceeds of production. Plus the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds that are later redistributed as commons. This is in practice the western model since voters demonstrably do not vote for policy but ideology.

    **Direct Economic/market Democracy: ** The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting for desired commons with the contributions that one has produced. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services which generates the proceeds some portion of which are used to produce commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. But competitive commons are class-weighted. This is an unlikely experiment except in small, very wealthy communities.

    **Direct Redistributive/Shareholder Democracy:** The voluntary organization of the production of commons by voting a SHARE of the proceeds from a mixed economy. Combined with the voluntary organization of production of goods and services, which generates the proceeds some portino of which are used to produce commons. This means meritocratic contribution to commons but egalitarian decision of commons. In this model competitive commons are possible, and no monopoly commons are necessary. This is a likely next generation of Government since it eliminates the unnecessary conflcit of monopoly commons and eliminates the existence of politicians who engage in corruption.

    We must organize cooperation (morality)

    We must organize reproduction (family)

    We must organize production (market)

    We must organize commons (government)

    We must organize a monopoly with which to hold our territory (military)

    If you aren’t using these terms then you’re probably engaged in error or lie.


    Source date (UTC): 2016-03-18 12:03:00 UTC