Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • It’s a Bit Like Studying for A STEM+L Degree

    October 21st, 2018 12:35 PM UNDERSTANDING PROPERTARIANISM IS A BIT LIKE STUDYING FOR A STEM+L DEGREE. THAT’S WHY IT TAKES TIME. IT’S NON-TRIVIAL.

    —“I’m having a hard time understanding propertarianism tbh. I’m reading your articles on the website but still….what should I do?:— Ayham Nedal

    [O]ur Reading List helps with general knowledge so that you can tell we know what we’re talking about. Propertarianism consists of a broad set of concepts that produce a logic and science of social science in all its uses. We draw terms and ideas from math to logic to philosophy to law to economics to the sciences. And it’s because we do so, that we were able to UNITE THE SCIENCES into a SINGLE LANGUAGE consistent across all of them, thereby eliminating the silos, and allowing us to identify the falsehoods or imprecisions in each of them. So we include books on every major subject in social science. The Introductions to Propertarianism are very helpful. They are: The CONCEPTS: 1) https://propertarianinstitute.com/basic-concepts/ (Which I should fill out a bit more if I get some time) AND THE CORE 2) https://propertarianinstitute.com/2016/01/05/an-overview-of-propertarianism-for-serious-newbies/ Libertarianism (Mises, Hayek, Haslitt, Rothbard, Hoppe), tried very hard to unite social science, economics, law, and politics but they were not successful. However, if you understand libertarianism, Ely Harman’s introduction is very helpful in helping with the transition. We probably should write a transition document for the Dark Enlightenment folk (Moldbug), and for Classical Liberals, and for Fascists. But we have only so much time…. HISTORY The cycles of history, and the competition between the Western (Science/Law), Asian (military/political), and Semitic (Religion,Mythology), is something almost anyone can understand. The secret to the west is easy to understand (computational velocity by sovereignty, reciprocity, natural law, markets in everything).. MANKIND The Acquisitionism (psychology), Propertarianism (ethics), and the Class System, and Perfect Government, are not difficult. but require learning some precise terms. This is harder than it should be in my opinion and I don’t know why it’s difficult. It’s just training yourself to categorize by property rather than moral norms. LOGIC Testimonialism (grammars, logic, scientific speech, and the geometry of meaning) is extremely challenging if you do not have experience in philosophy of science, math, and logic. and writing arguments in natural law (balanced transactions) takes quite a bit of practice. This is hard. But, it’s the entire basis of the program. Because it is the completion of the scientifc method that’s based upon testimonialism, and our ability to suppress fraud and deceit in the commons (political speech) is dependent upon encoding Testimonialism (a checklist of due diligences) into the law. IT’S BIG This is a bigger scope of work than Marxism. So we cover the entire spectrum of metaphysics, psychology, testimony (truth), ethics, sociology, politics, law, group evolutionary strategy, and war. Lastly, just ASK US. if I don’t answer, someone else will. We KNOW that we have to make a course for it. The course outline is already on the site. But without the book(s) it is not going to be easily taught. So everyone (me included) is waiting on me to finish – and it’s killing me…. lol.

  • Hoppe’s Getting Libertarianism Right

    October 21st, 2018 2:38 PM HOPPE’S GETTING LIBERTARIANISM RIGHT (Free Download from Mises) Please read the section starting page 75 on the Alt-Right as continuation of the Paleo-Conservative movement. mises.org/system/tdf/Getting%20Libertarianism%20Right%20August%2027.pdf

  • Hoppe’s Getting Libertarianism Right

    October 21st, 2018 2:38 PM HOPPE’S GETTING LIBERTARIANISM RIGHT (Free Download from Mises) Please read the section starting page 75 on the Alt-Right as continuation of the Paleo-Conservative movement. mises.org/system/tdf/Getting%20Libertarianism%20Right%20August%2027.pdf

  • GETTING LIBERTARIANISM RIGHT (Free Download from Mises) Please read the section

    https://mises.org/system/tdf/Getting%20Libertarianism%20Right%20August%2027.pdf?file=1&type=documentHOPPE’S GETTING LIBERTARIANISM RIGHT

    (Free Download from Mises)

    Please read the section starting page 75 on the Alt-Right as continuation of the Paleo-Conservative movement.

    https://mises.org/system/tdf/Getting%20Libertarianism%20Right%20August%2027.pdf?file=1&type=document

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-21 14:38:00 UTC

  • Property May Be Intangible but The Costs of It Are Not

    October 20th, 2018 9:49 AM

    PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT —“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott

  • Property May Be Intangible but The Costs of It Are Not

    October 20th, 2018 9:49 AM

    PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT —“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott

  • PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT —“Intangible property e

    PROPERTY MAY BE INTANGIBLE BUT THE COSTS OF IT ARE NOT

    —“Intangible property exists inside the realms of both personal and group property. Intangible property exists in ideas or information which men are willing to defend, such as a man’s reputation, or the reputation of a man’s family or ancestors. These things may not be tangible in such that you can point at or identify them, but they exist as property because men are willing to defend them with violence, often times even more so than the more tangible types of property.”— Allen Freeman via Oliver Westcott

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-20 09:49:00 UTC

  • Agency Must Be Trained

    October 16th, 2018 5:41 PM AGENCY MUST BE TRAINED by Brandon Hayes

    [A]gency has to be fostered and trained. We can develop systems to promote it. Having an agency based (propertarian) framework is a great first step. Teach people to view the world in a reciprocal fashion. We teach dogs to be helpful; I can teach even an objectively bad dog to not be a burden.

  • PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianis

    PROPERTARIANISM ISN’T AN IDEOLOGY. IT’S THE LOGIC OF RECIPROCITY (Propertarianism) AND THE SCIENCE OF TESTIMONY, COMBINED INTO A FORMAL RATIO-EMPIRICAL SYSTEM OF LAW (Decidability) FOR ETHICS, AND POLITICS.

    In other words, it’s the solution to social science.

    —“This is crucial for people that want to claim they don’t adhere to the “propertarian ideology”. It is not an ideology. It is a methodology and much like science it focuses on empirical evidence and the falsification of proposed truth claims. Most people that say they don’t agree with “propertarian ideology” have an ideology of their own that has been found to be based on lies via propertarian methods and that’s the real objection.”– Curtus Maximus (A Sock/Alias of Someone Else)

    You cannot defeat it. Sorry. You can however, state that despite your ideology being parasitic, predatory(immoral) and dishonest (fraudulent) that you cannot compete by meritocratic (market, evolutionary, eugenic) means, (meaning you’re inferior) and therefore must resort to parasitism, predation, and deceit (fraud), to survive by parasitism, predation, and fraud.

    It’s ok to do that. It’s just the truth. But you can’t make any kind of moral argument to support it.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 16:22:00 UTC

  • Honor and Decency are antithetical to the left. They mean ‘don’t steal’. The lef

    Honor and Decency are antithetical to the left. They mean ‘don’t steal’. The left HAS to be kleptocratic. They’re dysgenic.

    Source date (UTC): 2018-10-16 07:58:00 UTC