Curt Doolittle

Theme: Property

  • Libertarians talk about money and property as a proxy for limiting social and po

    Libertarians talk about money and property as a proxy for limiting social and political power over them. It’s fundamentally jewish separatism and nothing more. The right talks about morality as a proxy for rule of law. We just can’t accept that fascism won the 20th century.

    Source date (UTC): 2019-04-23 16:11:55 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1120721975721250817

    Reply addressees: @Lord_Keynes2

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/946085379349757952

    IN REPLY TO:

    Original post on X

    Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/946085379349757952

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542050487 Timestamp) (humor, truism, irony) —“The oppression of libertarians is just the free market in action. Violence is a service. Their tax dollars are a good.”—John Edward lolz

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542651949 Timestamp) INHERENT RIGHTS (IDEALS) VS INHERENT DEMAND AND ASSOCIATED COSTS (REALS) by Luke Weinhagen (important concept) —“Commons: Every single thing you pay for by either action, inaction,or forgone opportunity for discount or gain”— This is another area where much of the west is operating with a categorization error in place. We have been categorizing the concept “natural rights” as an INHERENT quality of each individual, not something that has a COST. We should be categorizing it as an available property, with a cost to gain interest in. A commons. Because of its relationship to reciprocity. natural rights is the root commons. All other commons extend from the foundation that natural rights creates and are limited by the breadth of those rights. One must, and can only, purchase interest in that commons through the demonstration of reciprocity and sovereignty. Failure to police this root commons, and extending it to everyone (categorization error – natural/available to all, not inherent/granted to all), creates a vulnerability (extends agency status to parasites) and exposes every derivative commons to parasitism. No correction downstream can remove this vulnerability, they are become attempts at compensation for that original flaw, just more imposed costs. (if I am understanding [Curt] correctly, this one is going to make heads explode when the correction is put in place – though the only other outcome is system collapse)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1542651949 Timestamp) INHERENT RIGHTS (IDEALS) VS INHERENT DEMAND AND ASSOCIATED COSTS (REALS) by Luke Weinhagen (important concept) —“Commons: Every single thing you pay for by either action, inaction,or forgone opportunity for discount or gain”— This is another area where much of the west is operating with a categorization error in place. We have been categorizing the concept “natural rights” as an INHERENT quality of each individual, not something that has a COST. We should be categorizing it as an available property, with a cost to gain interest in. A commons. Because of its relationship to reciprocity. natural rights is the root commons. All other commons extend from the foundation that natural rights creates and are limited by the breadth of those rights. One must, and can only, purchase interest in that commons through the demonstration of reciprocity and sovereignty. Failure to police this root commons, and extending it to everyone (categorization error – natural/available to all, not inherent/granted to all), creates a vulnerability (extends agency status to parasites) and exposes every derivative commons to parasitism. No correction downstream can remove this vulnerability, they are become attempts at compensation for that original flaw, just more imposed costs. (if I am understanding [Curt] correctly, this one is going to make heads explode when the correction is put in place – though the only other outcome is system collapse)

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543422155 Timestamp) WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? THE NATURAL LAW: “THE WHITE LAW” – THE LAW OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION Propertarianism refers only to the logic of Ethics. The propertarian project consists of the following FIVE collections of ideas:

    1. An explanation for the disproportionate success of the West in Bronze, Iron, and Steel Ages: We Invented Sovereignty, Truth, Rule of Law, and Complete Market Civilization which is the fastest possible means of adaptation to change – and the means by which we outpaced the rest. And explains the retaliation against western civilization by the middle peoples in those same ages – explaining the cause of the cycles of history.

    2. The completion of the scientific method, it’s restatement as the Law of Testimony, and its extension and application from the physical sciences to the social sciences, public speech, argument, and thought – thereby producing a value neutral, universal, fully commensurable, and fully decidable language of testimony (speech) – including language, logic, science, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, as well as the hard sciences and logics.

    3. A body of arguments answering the many and possibly majority of ethical, moral, and political questions, under that law. In practical effect, a body of universal law: The Natural Law of Sovereign Peoples.

    4. A Constitution that applies that completion of the scientific method, and:

    (a) Extends the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, coercion, and deceit from the market for goods and services, to the market for information (speech: display word and deed). Thereby eliminating the freedom to engage in the continuous recitation of falsehoods and the industrialization of lying that plagued the twentieth century. (b) De-Financializes, De-Politicizes, and De-Propagandizes our political orders and media, De-pseudosciences the Academy, and restores our education system and our group competitive abilities, including our unique truth telling regardless of the consequences to ourselves, the status hierarchy or the competence hierarchy. (c) Restores individual sovereignty and as a consequence, restores voluntary markets in all walks of life: association/disassociation, cooperation/non-cooperation, reproduction, production/competition, commons, and politics. (d) Restores the intergenerational family as the object of policy while retaining the individual as the object of law. As a consequence restores civil society. (e) Facilitates the development of regional differences in the production of commons by removing the federal government from all via-positiva activities, in particular the legislation of norms, and reduces it to it’s only desirable function as the insurer of last resort: Military, Judiciary of Conflicts between states, Insurer of natural disaster, and Treasury of Clearance of Currencies.

    1. The Course and Conduct of a Revolution to bring about this Reformation of the Constitution, and the saving of western civilization.

    THE LAW OF NATURE De Lege Naturae : The Law of Nature De Arte Testimonii : The Science of Testimony De Philosophia Aristocratiae : The Philosophy of Aristocracy De Scriptura Nobilitatis : The Scripture of Nobility De Professione Regum: The Art of Kings Viridis Bibliis Homines Europeii : The Green European Bible The Talmud to deceive The Bible to enslave The Koran to conquer The Manifesto to steal The General-Theory to impoverish The Critique to exterminate The Truth to make us free The Law to keep us free “THE WHITE LAW” ————————–CONTENTS————————– Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.) Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends. Ethics and Morality:..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment. Epistemology: …………Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality. Law: …………………………Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity. Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott. Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.) Strategy:………………….. Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism. Aesthetics:……………….,Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty). Constitution …………….A Second American Constitution Revolution………………..The Course and Conduct of a Revolution Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543422155 Timestamp) WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM? THE NATURAL LAW: “THE WHITE LAW” – THE LAW OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION Propertarianism refers only to the logic of Ethics. The propertarian project consists of the following FIVE collections of ideas:

    1. An explanation for the disproportionate success of the West in Bronze, Iron, and Steel Ages: We Invented Sovereignty, Truth, Rule of Law, and Complete Market Civilization which is the fastest possible means of adaptation to change – and the means by which we outpaced the rest. And explains the retaliation against western civilization by the middle peoples in those same ages – explaining the cause of the cycles of history.

    2. The completion of the scientific method, it’s restatement as the Law of Testimony, and its extension and application from the physical sciences to the social sciences, public speech, argument, and thought – thereby producing a value neutral, universal, fully commensurable, and fully decidable language of testimony (speech) – including language, logic, science, psychology, sociology, ethics, law, politics, and group evolutionary strategy, as well as the hard sciences and logics.

    3. A body of arguments answering the many and possibly majority of ethical, moral, and political questions, under that law. In practical effect, a body of universal law: The Natural Law of Sovereign Peoples.

    4. A Constitution that applies that completion of the scientific method, and:

    (a) Extends the demand for involuntary warranty of due diligence against ignorance, error, bias, coercion, and deceit from the market for goods and services, to the market for information (speech: display word and deed). Thereby eliminating the freedom to engage in the continuous recitation of falsehoods and the industrialization of lying that plagued the twentieth century. (b) De-Financializes, De-Politicizes, and De-Propagandizes our political orders and media, De-pseudosciences the Academy, and restores our education system and our group competitive abilities, including our unique truth telling regardless of the consequences to ourselves, the status hierarchy or the competence hierarchy. (c) Restores individual sovereignty and as a consequence, restores voluntary markets in all walks of life: association/disassociation, cooperation/non-cooperation, reproduction, production/competition, commons, and politics. (d) Restores the intergenerational family as the object of policy while retaining the individual as the object of law. As a consequence restores civil society. (e) Facilitates the development of regional differences in the production of commons by removing the federal government from all via-positiva activities, in particular the legislation of norms, and reduces it to it’s only desirable function as the insurer of last resort: Military, Judiciary of Conflicts between states, Insurer of natural disaster, and Treasury of Clearance of Currencies.

    1. The Course and Conduct of a Revolution to bring about this Reformation of the Constitution, and the saving of western civilization.

    THE LAW OF NATURE De Lege Naturae : The Law of Nature De Arte Testimonii : The Science of Testimony De Philosophia Aristocratiae : The Philosophy of Aristocracy De Scriptura Nobilitatis : The Scripture of Nobility De Professione Regum: The Art of Kings Viridis Bibliis Homines Europeii : The Green European Bible The Talmud to deceive The Bible to enslave The Koran to conquer The Manifesto to steal The General-Theory to impoverish The Critique to exterminate The Truth to make us free The Law to keep us free “THE WHITE LAW” ————————–CONTENTS————————– Metaphysics:…………….Vitruvianism: Man is the measure of all things man (cog. sci.) Psychology: ……………..Acquisitionism: Man acquires and defends. Ethics and Morality:..Propertarianism. (Reciprocity) The Ethics of Non Imposition, production, and investment. Epistemology: …………Testimonialism. The competition between imaginary associations and existential measurements in all dimensions of actionable reality. Law: …………………………Algorithmic Natural Law. The Natural Law of Reciprocity. Strictly constructed from the test of reciprocity. Sociology: ………………..Compatibilism: Intertemporal division of perception, cognition, knowledge, labor, and advocacy wherein we combine information and calculate compatible means to the achievement of different ends through voluntary conflict, competition, cooperation, and boycott. Politics: ……………………Markets in Everything. (Which I call “Market Fascism” with tongue in cheek.) Strategy:………………….. Agency: Maximization of agency through Transcendence, Sovereignty, and Heroism Spirituality:………………Transcendence: Masculine Stoicism, Feminine Epicureanism, Ritual Familialism, Feast Naturalism,…….Festival Nationalism. Aesthetics:……………….,Truth(Testimonial), Excellence(Density), Goodness(Morality[‘the commons’]) and Beauty(Bounty). Constitution …………….A Second American Constitution Revolution………………..The Course and Conduct of a Revolution Curt Doolittle The Propertarian Institute Kiev, Ukraine

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543425047 Timestamp) MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM” (required reading)

    1. Trade has always existed (generating exchange)

    2. Markets have almost always existed (generating prices).

    3. Capitalists have existed as long as there have been markets (generating means of production).

    4. Northern Europeans (Venetians less so. Saxons largely, the Hansa in particular, the English systematically, the Dutch first at political scale), developed rule of law – which is why they escaped the church with the reformation.)

    5. Capitalism consists of rule of law consisting nearly entirely of markets, and socialism of rule of men eliminating or vastly reducing markets – but all polities have some mixed economy and must do so. The problem is that the state is superior at investing in some commons, but the private sector is far better at allocating and maximizing the returns on capital.

    6. So capitalism and socialism only evolved once the industrial revolution came into play – and the socialists demanded control over production. Capitalism then was the name they used for ‘market bias under rule of law’ , and socialism ‘state bias under rule of men’.

    So any statement about when was capitalism invented, is rater ‘stupid’ really. The answer is very simple: capitalism was the ‘jewish’ view of markets, and socialism the ‘jewish’ view of the state. And suckers bought into this false dichotomy. The question is and always will be the utilities of the state monopoly vs the private sector market. And as it stands, the lesson is quite clear: when it is simple and you know how to do it, but it’s risky and expensive, the state can provide startup capital and market protections. Once that investment is running, it can be ‘sold’ to the private sector who can then maximize its potential. The USA has mastered the art of moving this high risk investment into the private sector, but this has had the effect of hollowing out predictable sectors of the economy. So it appears that once again, there are those things it is better for the state to produce (labor-consuming and strategic companies, that are less speculative and produce slower longer returns), and things that it is better for the private sector to produce (IQ consuming and highly speculative things with shorter higher returns.) CONVERSELY The flood river and irrigation valleys of the fertile, crescent, pakistan-india, and china, could produce state-capital easily, just as the west could produce private-capital easily. The west and east homogenous peoples higher trust. The center tribal heterogenous people lower trust. It’s not complicated. You do what you can with the people and geography you have.

  • Curt Doolittle shared a link.

    (FB 1543427188 Timestamp) THE PIRATE CODE IS VERY CLOSE TO OUR ANCIENT LAW https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_code

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543425047 Timestamp) MORE ON DE-PROPAGANDIZING “CAPITALISM” (required reading)

    1. Trade has always existed (generating exchange)

    2. Markets have almost always existed (generating prices).

    3. Capitalists have existed as long as there have been markets (generating means of production).

    4. Northern Europeans (Venetians less so. Saxons largely, the Hansa in particular, the English systematically, the Dutch first at political scale), developed rule of law – which is why they escaped the church with the reformation.)

    5. Capitalism consists of rule of law consisting nearly entirely of markets, and socialism of rule of men eliminating or vastly reducing markets – but all polities have some mixed economy and must do so. The problem is that the state is superior at investing in some commons, but the private sector is far better at allocating and maximizing the returns on capital.

    6. So capitalism and socialism only evolved once the industrial revolution came into play – and the socialists demanded control over production. Capitalism then was the name they used for ‘market bias under rule of law’ , and socialism ‘state bias under rule of men’.

    So any statement about when was capitalism invented, is rater ‘stupid’ really. The answer is very simple: capitalism was the ‘jewish’ view of markets, and socialism the ‘jewish’ view of the state. And suckers bought into this false dichotomy. The question is and always will be the utilities of the state monopoly vs the private sector market. And as it stands, the lesson is quite clear: when it is simple and you know how to do it, but it’s risky and expensive, the state can provide startup capital and market protections. Once that investment is running, it can be ‘sold’ to the private sector who can then maximize its potential. The USA has mastered the art of moving this high risk investment into the private sector, but this has had the effect of hollowing out predictable sectors of the economy. So it appears that once again, there are those things it is better for the state to produce (labor-consuming and strategic companies, that are less speculative and produce slower longer returns), and things that it is better for the private sector to produce (IQ consuming and highly speculative things with shorter higher returns.) CONVERSELY The flood river and irrigation valleys of the fertile, crescent, pakistan-india, and china, could produce state-capital easily, just as the west could produce private-capital easily. The west and east homogenous peoples higher trust. The center tribal heterogenous people lower trust. It’s not complicated. You do what you can with the people and geography you have.

  • Curt Doolittle updated his status.

    (FB 1543759047 Timestamp) ART ISN”T THAT HARD TO PRICE – IT’S HARD TO LIQUIDATE QUICKLY —“…Value of art varies….”— Hmmmm…. One can objectively compare art, particularly by triangulation. One can, with some skill, estimate its current market value by RANGE – dealers are relatively good at it. But doing so requires a rather great deal of knowledge of the pieces in the inventory whether on market or not. When talking of rarities (culturally, technically, or aesthetically significant pieces, or pieces from an artist), one has to understand the liquidity of customers and their incentives. Houses are less ridiculous, and more likely to take a loss, but follow the same general rules. Fashion less ridiculous than houses, but following the same general rules. Ergo, “All Stereotypes Are True”, “Class Stereotypes Are True”, “Taste Stereotypes Are True”, and one need only understand the relationship between Stereotype, Available Inventory, and Current Economic Conditions within that Stereotype. As in all economic questions, the more predictable the price range the lower the value of the service, commodity, product, item. Signal Value is Costly Regardless of Class.