THE SCOPE OF PROPERTARIAN LAW ON TRUTHFUL SPEECH
—“One of the counter currents arguments was that in a Proprietarian system of law. privacy would be wrecked, because everyone would be suing each other for insufficient warranty of speech. So you would constantly have to justify that your speech was as good as it could have been according to your knowledge at the time. It does seem like a high bar no?”— Michael Churchill
The bar is science, politics, economics, law, education, religion – in other words we avoid it anyway when speaking to one another. the SCOPE is advocacy of HARM.
What would you want to sue intellectuals, public officials, news media, political activists for when making public speech?
Both sides of the discourse want the other to stop. My argument is that once they stop they can only negotiate trades, and truthfully so.
Which as far as I know solves the problem of politics: extension of market demand to all speech.
In real life people adapt to laws that promote cooperation because its in their interests.
Law that is enforceable under tort creates good people without state monitoring, interference, or monopoly out of individual and group self interest.
Tort law is the via negativa market that mirrors the exchange via positiva market. we need both remunerative and restitutionary markets.
Asymmetries permit abuses. and neutrality remains possible at all times.
How this affronts privacy when public speech is by definition public not private, is beyond me.
My understanding is that humans with interest in public affairs will seek education sufficient for truthful discourse, and that the education system will adapt to provide it.
P-Law does not ask you to produce public speech and be right, only TRUTHFUL AND MORAL by practicing due dilligence sufficient for the demands, claims, or criticisms you are making.
P teaches us that t is fairly easy to perform such due diligence if we are taught it like grammar and ethics as we were in the past.
The socialists removed these from education in order to undermine our civlization – by design. We can not only restore these skills to the common people out of their own self defense, but state them in scientific terms and operational logic rather, than religious, traditional, normative and moral .. and in doing so restoring truth, sacredness of the commons, and good citizens ship to our people.
I think things trough. 😉
It’s my job. 😉
-curt