2) But if it’s for practical necessity, do you have the right to deny say, a subway, monorail, highway, if you are ‘highly compensated’ for it? What about the ranchers on the texas-mexico border? 3) For developer profits? No. Not unless you also get a share of the appreciation.
@probiotical 1) I don’t think this is the tough subject that it appears to be if you work with a spectrum of cases (If you test the theory). As if is it a question of practical necessity or political or private profit, or your extortion? Dunno if I have the patience to write it in tweets…
@probiotical 1) I don’t think this is the tough subject that it appears to be if you work with a spectrum of cases (If you test the theory). As if is it a question of practical necessity or political or private profit, or your extortion? Dunno if I have the patience to write it in tweets…
1) I don’t think this is the tough subject that it appears to be if you work with a spectrum of cases (If you test the theory). As if is it a question of practical necessity or political or private profit, or your extortion? Dunno if I have the patience to write it in tweets…
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
So it’s not narcissism unless you are in some way or other demanding attention from others (Theft). If you’re just autistic that’s part of the division of labor between solipsistic to balanced to autistic so that we sense, pursue, and falsify the world calculating w the spectrum
@ivanlawhg @EMichaelJones1 @NickJFuentes @SocraticNEET Narcissism and Analytic borderline of the spectrum only means that you don’t rely on information from others, and only on information you can test.This is the analytic version of female solipsism,where the female mind cannot insulate itself from others so personalizes everything.
@ivanlawhg @EMichaelJones1 @NickJFuentes @SocraticNEET Narcissism and Analytic borderline of the spectrum only means that you don’t rely on information from others, and only on information you can test.This is the analytic version of female solipsism,where the female mind cannot insulate itself from others so personalizes everything.
This is not a bad tactic, but it’s not going to win anything/. There is no easy way out. They invaded and stole it, we conquered and stole it, there is not alternative.
Stop trying to escape reality. There is only one way out.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Liberal islands in a sea of red. Forcible conversion of blue cities to city states. Return of control over all but inter-state property conflicts to the states.
@DailyCaller We need to divide the country. Let the liberals have their own country with all the insane laws and divisions they love and demand that the rest of us abide by and love.
photos_and_videos/TimelinePhotos_kg5QueHwVw/81041691_173436870721141_8715498446229864448_o_173436867387808.jpg EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.EXPANDING THE BULLET LIST: WHAT IS PROPERTARIANISM?
LETS USE MINIMUM DETAIL
“Propertarianism is the completion of (the complete) scientific method.”
That’s it. Period. But it’s a profound thing. Very.
Now what do we do with that completed scientific method?
This scientific method is value neutral, and commensurable regardless of discipline, and universal in application.
We use that scientific method to produce a value neutral fully commensurable language across all disciplines.
We use that logic and language to produce a universally commensurable value neutral system of law.
We used that value neutral system of law to produce a constitution.
That constitution’s principle innovation is to incrementally suppress the means by which western civlization in the ancient and modern world was undermined by crimes of plausible deniability (which I won’t explain right here), but that’s what you think of when you think of leftism.
One can create an infinite number of constitutions of infinite variety using that law, as long as one constructs them truthfully and reciprocally – which is a problem for the left.
The constitution we propose restores the american constitution to its original intent as military and treasury that allows for the concentration of military power sufficient for defense of the continent, devolves all other powers to the states, makes everyone liable for the truth and reciprocity of speech in public to the public about matters public (outlaws leftism), and reforms every single aspect of life so that we restore our civilization from the ((())) harms done to it this past century.
That constitution is on line and in progress and is a lot to swallow, but then so are the Declaration, Articles of Confederation, Federalist Papers, Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Amendements, History of Supreme Court Rulings, Federal Code, and Individual State constitutions and codes.
Propertarianism is the completion of the scientific method, it’s application to the totality of human knowledge, creating a universally commensurable value neutral language; its embodiment in the natural common law of tort; and as a consequence the eradication of [all deceit] from the informational commons.
See?
LETS ADD A LITTLE MORE DETAIL.
Propertarianism completes the scientific method. The culmination of the philosophical program of the 20th century was that there is no via positiva scientific method.
Instead, The scientific method is a via negativa method: falsificationary. There are only so many dimensions humans can cognitively imagine and cognitively falsify by tests of consistency: categorical, logical, operational, empirical, rational, reciprocal, complete in scope with defined limits, and consistent and therefore coherent across those dimensions, where one warranties such due diligence, and is liable for the consequence of his displays words and deeds resulting from such statements.
By using this method we can create a universally commensurable, value neutral, operational language and as such a universally commensurable logic, across all fields: a system of measurement for the truthfulness of speech.
We can then use this language and this method to restate the constitution, and our law, in scientific, and operational language, closed to interpretation (legislation from the bench).
Moreover we can use this law to outlaw the primary innovation in organized crime that was used to undermine western civilization: false promise; baiting into hazard, using pilpul (sophism) and critique(undermining, straw manning) under cover of plausible deniability to profit from the imposition of harms upon others by financialization (innumeracy), pseudoscience, sophism, supernaturalism, denialism, including the false promises, pseudo-mathematics, pseudoscience, sophistry, and denial of marx, boas, freud, Cantor, Adorno et al, Gramsci et al, Derrida et al, Friedan et al, rand/rothbard, and the neocons.
And yes, we can even use it to reform and obtain insight into the failures of Bohr ad Einstein that hilbert predicted, and we can explain the 20th century of mysticism and deceit that hayek warned us of.
In other words we can end the jewish-muslim, marxist-postmodernis-feminist program of lying by false promise, and explain why it’s a crime.
So, hopefully you can understand why this brief passage here is not something I would stick on the front page for marketing purposes
WHAT IS A SYSTEM OF THOUGHT? (A GRAMMAR)
What’s the difference between aristotelianism, platonism, and abrahamism?
What’s the difference between reason, logic, rationalism?
What’s the difference between Aristotelian, enlightenment(empirical) and scientific, revolutions?
Whats the difference between math, logic, programming, recipes, and protocols?
So what is the difference between aristotelianism, empiricism, science, and testimonialism (propertarianism)?
Well, the difference is from the rational to the empirical to the operational.
What does operational mean? It means the difference between logic (Sets) and programming (operations).
It means the difference between logic (language), empiricism (observation), and operations (actions).
And if you can’t comprehend it – it doesn’t matter. You probably don’t know calculus, analysis, algebraic geometry, relativity, quantum mechanics, or the difference between hierarchical, relational, functional, object oriented, and bayesian programming, or the design patterns in each. Or the fundamental problems of mathematical economics, categories, use of symmetries as intermediary systems of economic measurement. Or even the problem of protein folding or why all of those questions are related by the problem a lack of an operational logic of geometries that replaces the operational logic of lines and curves using positional names that we call mathematics.
Original tweet unavailable — we could not load the text of the post this reply is addressing on X. That usually means the tweet was deleted, the account is protected, or X does not expose it to the account used for archiving. The Original post link below may still open if you view it in X while signed in.
Emotions are measures of changes in state of property.
by Martin Štěpán ( Brandon Hayes)
Emotions are measures of changes in state of property. When they tell you hate or any other emotion is a crime, they’re trying to convince you your measurements are erroneous and to get you to stop measuring so that they can change the state of your property without obstacle.
Intentions don’t matter. It won’t happen. It’s not possible, and it’s easy to stop. At worst they will shut it down. Likely case someone solves the usability and theft problems and it will function as token money. Best case it serves as a temporary store of cash.
@curtdoolittle @PeterSchiff The point of bitcoin is to free ourselves of one government. We won’t just go to Bitcoin USA centralized edition because it’s backed by the USA.
Why wouldn’t the government just create a monolithic distributed property registry and transaction ledger that like the banking system provided instantaneous transactions, zero interest consumer loans, and redistribution of money supply directly to citizens and outlaw all others?
@curtdoolittle @PeterSchiff I’m only 18 so I have a naive mind when it comes to how the world works, but bitcoin in my eyes is the future of money and government. I haven’t seen a good argument against it yet. It really solves the problems of traditional money and government.
