Theme: Property

  • You say self consistent but you mean circular. instead, any exchange of rights m

    You say self consistent but you mean circular. instead, any exchange of rights must be reciprocal – including possible. This is why only negative rights can exist.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:27:57 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263627624938602496

    Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263624685599592448

  • I made a necessary inescapable argument: You can invent whatever imaginary causa

    I made a necessary inescapable argument: You can invent whatever imaginary causality you want, but as I said, rights must be brought into existence and envorced. And in response to your nonsense statement. Law has greater force than religion. Religions are resistance movements.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:26:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263627270566088704

    Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263626584260374529

  • Platonism: fairy tales for young adults. Fact: Rights must be brought into exist

    Platonism: fairy tales for young adults. Fact: Rights must be brought into existence by applied violence. Property rights exists because men make them. Might makes all rights. As such rights are established and maintained only by those able to use organized violence to do so.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-22 00:06:12 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263622150172352513

    Reply addressees: @PaulDesmoParker @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263619133586862081

  • Strictly Constructed Natural Law Jurisprudence.

    When you go to law school you do not learn what we teach here: strictly constructed natural law jurisprudence. Most of what you learn is procedure, statute (legislation), and case law (examples). Or “How to work the process”. That’s why P makes sense to you. Because its internally consistent. Now, once you learn ENOUGH case law, you realize that the court does a pretty good job most of the time. The problem is the lack of jurisprudence (rules of law) in the constitution, and the ‘legislation’ that violates the natural law on top of it. Most of the ‘bad stuff’ is procedural manipulation somewhere between the police, the prosecution, the court staff. There are very good lawyers and not so good lawyers. And you can tell when reading the arguments put before the court which one you’re dealing with. Mostly there are waaaaaaayyyyy too many lawyers. And that’s why I prefer the british two stage system. So that a lawyer(customer service representative) and a barrister(presents to the court) are separated. This allows you to get customer service from a lawyer, but a barrister may refuse your case. This savse the judge and jury from legal clown world. That’s the ONLY thing I really prefer about the british system other than the wigs. I really like the wigs.

  • Strictly Constructed Natural Law Jurisprudence.

    When you go to law school you do not learn what we teach here: strictly constructed natural law jurisprudence. Most of what you learn is procedure, statute (legislation), and case law (examples). Or “How to work the process”. That’s why P makes sense to you. Because its internally consistent. Now, once you learn ENOUGH case law, you realize that the court does a pretty good job most of the time. The problem is the lack of jurisprudence (rules of law) in the constitution, and the ‘legislation’ that violates the natural law on top of it. Most of the ‘bad stuff’ is procedural manipulation somewhere between the police, the prosecution, the court staff. There are very good lawyers and not so good lawyers. And you can tell when reading the arguments put before the court which one you’re dealing with. Mostly there are waaaaaaayyyyy too many lawyers. And that’s why I prefer the british two stage system. So that a lawyer(customer service representative) and a barrister(presents to the court) are separated. This allows you to get customer service from a lawyer, but a barrister may refuse your case. This savse the judge and jury from legal clown world. That’s the ONLY thing I really prefer about the british system other than the wigs. I really like the wigs.

  • You own what others permit you to own. And men who give that permission create i

    You own what others permit you to own. And men who give that permission create institutions that insure that ownership with the threat of organized violence we call ‘the law’. So demonstrably no,you don’t ‘own’ your fetus,baby, or children. The law just no longer enforces murder.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 22:08:07 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263592436636413955

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263570844166602778

  • I never err on matters of law. everything including right to life is traded

    I never err on matters of law. everything including right to life is traded.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 20:10:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263562851261779969

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263562375459999744

  • Actually, it’s the most difficult question of law. Rights are exchanged. So no i

    Actually, it’s the most difficult question of law. Rights are exchanged. So no it’s not a property right. Its irreciproal. So no it’s not a right. It’s decided by consequences.And because we coddle women. We don’t hold them responsible for their actions. We allow them to murder.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-21 19:58:29 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263559811867848704

    Reply addressees: @TheRealFMCH @Maroeladalx10DB @laurenboebert @austere1717

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263520322118135809

  • As with anything by the Undermine Tribe, it’s a half truth, but yes P would put

    As with anything by the Undermine Tribe, it’s a half truth, but yes P would put these companies out of the business of selling our data.

    Also, P-constitution nationalizes the major players.


    Source date (UTC): 2020-05-20 13:47:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263104162159460352

    Reply addressees: @KurtKurtking

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1263100859962933248

  • Man – Mind

    Man – Mind

    Action

    “Man Must Act” (dark forces of  need, time, and ignorance)

    |BEHAVIOR| property(acquisition/defense) > prey drive > gender drive >
     cooperation drive > personality > intuition > reason > calculation >
     computation > markets > symmetries.

    Minds

    ( … )

    Brain

    HUMAN FACULTIES 1. sense (neurons-nerves) 2. disambiguation (constant relations – cortex), 3. perception(integration-prediction – cortex), 4. intuition (auto-association-prediction) (hippocampus-cortex + valuation(emotion)) 5. attention (attention-prediction) (thalamus-hippoampus-cortex), 6. will (recursion-prediction) (prefrontal, thalamus, hippocampus, cortex) 7. and release of actions;

    Consciousness

    THE RULES OF CONSCIOUSNESS WHEREAS 1. Our attention rotates in a competition between sensation(observation and construction by prediction and reward identification), imagination (possibility by association), holding attention on a goal (possibility by continuous opportunity seizure), and releasing predicted actions (in pursuit of the goal). WHEREAS 2. We rotate between sensation (observation and construction by prediction), anticipating (goal prediction), and storing (remembering by stimulating and rehearsing), on a 1/10th of a second rotation (Theta) creating competition and choice. AND WHEREAS 3. There is no observer, other than the memory of an observation. 4. There are no observations other than sequences. 5. There is no comparison of observations other than to previous sequences. 6. There is no order in sequences other than that created by sequences. 7. There are no sequences other than those of sensations. 8. There is no existence sensed, other than those changes in time. 9. Without change we cannot sense time. THEREFORE Existence is a verb Experience is a verb Imagination is a verb Consciousness is a verb. Because Acting is a verb – and we can only act in time. AND THEREFORE Without action, we produce no existence, no experience, no sequence, no memory, no consciousness. AND THEREFORE There is no observer other than the observations (hierarchy of increasing of sequences of memories in time. AND THEREFORE We see what the camera sees. We do not record images, but sequences of related stimuli. “I AM, MEANING, I EXIST AS, THE HIERARCHY OF MY MEMORY IN MOTION”

    Arousal is not Consciousness

    Confusing Arousal with Consciousness is like confusing the light switch with the light. Just ’cause we can turn off the switch doesn’t tell us how the light is created. We can interfere with any number of parts (Colostrum) and shut down experience. That doesn’t tell us anything. The question is, how does that mushy wetware synthesize past memory present experience, and future prediction, from millions of nerves (measurements) into our rather amazing conflated experiences of past, present, and future? (cortical hierarchy, parahippocampal, perirhinal, entorhinal cortices, and subiculum.) How do we shift between narrow focus, near perception, environmental perception, self-perception, and deep introspection and imagination? (thalamus) Why is it we can react so quickly that we can hit a curveball with a bat? (basal ganglia, cerebellum, and cortical prediction) How do we Assemble memories and experience them? (Hippocampus) What is that feeling of me? (mostly, hippocampus) Why can’t we pin it down. “Cause it’s a verb not a noun”. The continuous change in state in a hierarchy of ever smaller cycles of time….

    Attention

    Neural Economy

    ( … ) Hayek’s knowledge, tradition, habits…. limiting burden of reason.

    The Will To Act

    (necessary  … preservation of the will to act … dunning kruger confidence )