FOR THOSE QUESTIONING HAIDT’S MORAL FOUNDATIONS (@JonHaidt)
Unfortunately life’s experience, the study of philosophy and history – as well as the questionable social sciences, are insufficient to understand Haidt is correct. We need genetics, neuroscience, cognitive science, behavioral economics, and evolutionary development.
🙁 And thats a lot of ‘need’, at too high a cost, for most people to satisfy.
Sex differences are unfortunately one of the specializations I’ve had to develop in my research on the institutionalization of lying and group differences in their strategies of ‘lying’. And sex differences in lying is a terrifying nietzchean void that exposes too much of human nature for most of us to willingly tolerate.
Explanation
Here is the outline of the relationship between genetics, moral bias, and resulting political bias.
1) The sex differences are:
– Feminine vs Masculine
– Lateral (more) vs longitudinal Brain Organization (fast)
– In Time (now) vs Over Time (then)
– Direct (perceptible) vs Abstract (predicted) Causality
– Empathizing vs Systematizing
– Experience vs Consequence
– HyperConsuming vs Capitalizing
– Devotion in time vs Loyalty over time
– Special Pleading/asymmetry vs Consistency/symmetry Status by Consumption w/o responsibility vs Status by Capitalizing with responsibility for capital
– Irresponsibility vs Responsibility for Commons
– One/Few vs Populations/Many Small
– Scale vs Large Scale
– Prey(Submission) vs Preditor(Dominance)
– Herd vs Packs Global vs National
– Dysgenic vs Eugenic
– Devolutionary vs Evolutionary
See: https://t.co/YkDHuL6Pgt
2) Moral Foundations As Sex Differences in Resource Dependence (Capital): The moral foundations explain the capital that the sexes evolved to guarantee status and reproduction given the asymmetry of the sexes.
See: https://t.co/1vHb48UoNs
3) Political Bias is the Result of those same differnces: The left is biased to the feminine cognitive emotional bias and the right to the masculine cognitive emotional bias.
See: https://t.co/BmCeTKZjTd
4) Sex Differences We Observe in Demonstrated Behavior In Moral and Political Bias:
– The feminine left seeks as the feminine does to maximize consumption especially of attention and signalling as a reproductive and consumption maximization strategy by parasitically extracting surpluses they cannot produce, from males who can, without exchange, or exchange at the lowest cost, with the most devotion in time, with the least ingroup loyalty over time, reflecting the female reproductive and evolutionary strategy.
– The masculine right seeks as the masculine does to accumulate capital for the purpose of attracting the feminine at the least cost, the most loyalty AND the most ingroup loyalty over time, reflecting the male reproductive and evolutionary strategy.
Its Universal
This is precisely what we see. Everywhere. Throughout all of time. Across all civilizations.
Even if, as in a popular topic of the current year, because of fragility of sexual development, whether in-utero, early development, later trauma, or dysphoria, when we test those whose sexual preference reverses from their genetic sex, their brain is visibly operating (fMRI) in the mode of their genetic sex, and so is their cognition even though their valence and expression varies to suit their preference.
Closing
Now that does NOT mean that haidt fully explains such matters as I have outlined here. He doesn’t. And it doesn’t mean he doesn’t instead communicate a normal bias. But it means not only isn’t he wrong, but it’s effectively that he CAN’T be wrong.
My suspicion is that it’s common to interpret his work as if the BIASES are absolutes rather than bias in distribution between the feminine(progressive), ascendant male (libertarian), and dominant male (conservative)
Feel free to ask any questions.
Cheers
Curt Doolittle
The Natural Law Institute.
