Theme: Productivity

  • REFRAMING 1) Very few people in any company ‘matter’ so to speak – they just nee

    REFRAMING
    1) Very few people in any company ‘matter’ so to speak – they just need to do their jobs well enough not to ‘badly matter’.
    2) Most of those jobs that are clerical (Don’t require physical activity) can be operated remotely.
    3) Many Many clerical jobs can be replaced by automation cheaply – more cheaply than physical jobs that require capital equipment investment.
    4) There is a culture-of-thought-leadership, culture-of-information, and culture-of-loyalty aspect to the people who DO matter in a company. It’s absolutely true that management teams do the most valuable work in after-work chats, over dinner, or at breakfast in the morning.
    5) That said we should expect the emergence of home-clerical, on site-mechanical, on-site and mobile transportation and delivery to reduce pressure on office space just as we have seen technology gut retail space.
    6) We should expect not only re-shoring of production due to the decline of american financed globalization. But we should expect policy that re-shores nearly all service and clerical work for the same reason: simple economics of needing the jobs.

    (I designed software a long time ago, in the 80s that was very good at measuring productivity that preveiously required middle management – today’s software is much better than in the past, and will only get better. The problem is … most of us aren’t very productive. ๐Ÿ˜‰ The result might (pray it will) end up with shorter work days or weeks. Because most of us rae good for 4 to 6 hours a day at most. There are some of us who are workaholics that can work three times that easily, and happily. But it’s not ‘normal’ human behavior. And it’s bad for family formation.)

    Reply addressees: @BankerWeimar


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-26 15:07:20 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1662113193924108290

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661903233462284288

  • “Q: Whats a sure thing in investment? all ventures are speculative to a certain

    –“Q: Whats a sure thing in investment? all ventures are speculative to a certain degree.”–

    All costs are opportunity costs. The very high chance you can get a 14-16%, or even 18% return, unless something catastrophic happens, because you’re buying into a quality biz at a good price, vs. losing 3-6% in inflation and fees? It’s an easy choice.

    Now a sure thing is a biz you fully understand and understand the risks and recognize the only problem is capital availability because the banks (smaller) and investors (larger) only want bigger deals with bigger returns. And they save these ‘sure’ deals for working with companies already in their network. Now, then you get the warren buffet strategy of sure things at a good price, and you accumulate enough investment over time to buy really, really, good assets at good prices.

    There is a wonderful investment space between the traditional banking biz and the lower-end venture capitalists, for angels to make money all day long in perpetuity. The problem is that every deal costs the same time and effort to vet. So your returns are limited to the number of deals you can vet and invest in without entering the VC market profile of risk. Every fish eats one smaller than he, up the hierarchy of fish. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    As an angel, you only need to convince yourself or maybe a friend and partner. As a member of an angel network you can work to get a piece of nearly every deal in the network – because it’s best to invest in what you understand, and everyone understands something a bit different from everyone else.

    As a low-end VC you’ve taken other people’s money with the promise of some rate of return. So you have to convince your partners to invest that money, and sometimes the people you’ve taken the money from. And because of multiple fingers in the pie you have to seek higher returns.

    Some of us just like learning about and investing businesses. And some angels basically enjoy helping young companies make money. And some others are trying to get multiples on their or other’s cash. And some of those people have a mission good or bad as well.

    Reply addressees: @jonathanmizero


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 18:51:34 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661444848518397966

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661441729667498008

  • PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS Every once in a while I burn

    PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS
    Every once in a while I burn out on the formal work for one reason or another. Either I’m just tired, or I lose patience with the social media space, or something internal to the organization makes me question why I concern myself with it at all.

    And when that happens, I usually return to my other ‘hobbies’, which are business, economics, technology, and war. And for some reason, I’m interested in the changes in the business world I’ve seen over the past ten years, or maybe just since 2016. And I’ve realized it’s the inclusion of GenZ into the already weak half of the Millennial cohort. And let’s say I’m as afraid of what I see there, as much as I’m afraid of dating, marriage, and reproduction rates, immigration rates, the Marxist-to-woke march through the institutions, and the restoration of american, or at least anglosphere, isolationism.

    Talking with a friend who I respect yesterday, and I’m kind of awed at times by what respectably educated and sophisticated people do not comprehend about the hard work of running businesses at scale. Meaning outside the SMB market.

    Conversely, at the top of the market with public companies you have such a luxury of available capital and financing that private companies don’t – even if it comes at the cost of regulatory burden, board burden, and shareholder burden – none of which convey the value they purport to any more than an insurance company and an auditor. I mean, some of the largest public companies are really just financial firms managing their investments and distribution channels.

    So while small businesses may be hard to start (usually I get to 5m the first year), the hard part of running a business begins as soon as you exit the SMB market and enter the middle market, because if your company is exceptional, profitable, and growing, you are always constrained by a shortage of nothing more than float, developing operational excellence, and building a managment team that lets you focus on the next three years, rather than the present one.

    We have been in an era of extraordinary capital avilability. The first money I was a part of raising was 5M in the early 80s. But the time we hit the 90s it was trivial. And even after 2008, at least in my sectors (technology) it’s been a frat party.

    But that capital was made possible by the boomer generation coinciding with (a) the postwar advantage of the USA as the only remaining industrial civilization, (b) the reagan era economics of defeating the soviets (c) the windfall from the 30 year tech boom (my lifetime), (d) and the integration of foreign markets, (e) the absurd tolerance for accumulating debt especially consumer debt, (f) altogether allowing the boomers to stick money into every crack and crevice of opportunity in the economy, and then some.

    But (a) the boomers are gone, they are now living on those investments, they will not be adding but subracting from capital and expecting hard returns on it (b) present generations have burned the debt of their first home ownership on education that has not and will not produce previous generations of returns. (c) The USA will remain for all predictiable futures, and the dollar will remain, the haven for foreign investment – simply because we’re just the least bad of the major currencies, and have the most stable rule of law – but that investment will be conservative (d) the cheap cost of good created by the American postwar order (and previous british order), that was intended to create federations of peaceful people, isn’t survivalbe with the return of agrarian empires that federalism was designed to replace, in China (if the CCP survives), Iran_vs_Turkey-MENA, Russia (if she survives), and the many south american countries that have a long way to go before they exit the corruption of socialist countries, even if they ever can evolve into advanced rule-of-law economies.

    So, I see naivety in the population, ignorance in the population, demographic decline in aggregate IQ forcing us into second world norms traditions values and institutions. I see a broken governmen torn between a failing postwar ambition and the left’s postwar neo-marxist ambitions including the replacement of the founding population, their institutions, history, traditions, values, norms, habits, and metaphysical presumptions.

    And I don’t see any way out of it other than the traditional one all civilizations rely upon: the use of the military industrial complex to restore incentives, education, capital organization, and discipline that washes away the old economy and forces a new one.

    Now there are alternatives. But that’s the most likely one that I can see – despite the military-state-intel complex’s rather competent understanding of the world context, in competition with a set of leftist institutions of that same postwar era assuming institutional capture is within reach at precisely the time the capital they w ant to redistribute and control is evaporating like a shallow puddle on the DC airport tarmac in July.

    We do not have the human capital to do other than suffer the next decade without a re-concentration of human capital away from rent seeking (financialism, government, academy, media, entertainment) into knowledge capital, institutional capital, behavioral capital, and assets that can compensate for the set of declines. Declines made possible because libertarians and conservaties are too full of christian tolerance, forgiveness, and foolish optimism as well as ‘leave me alone’ to have stopped it.

    It’s going to take 2M to show up in DC for 90 days to fix this mess, with demand for policy reforms, and thus avoiding either crisis, collapse, or civil war.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 18:40:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661442136171053056

  • PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS Every once in a while I burn

    PHILOSOPHY VACATION WEEK, AND THOUGHTS ON BUSINESS
    Every once in a while I burn out on the formal work for one reason or another. Either I’m just tired, or I lose patience with the social media space, or something internal to the organization makes me question why I concern myself with it at all.

    And when that happens I usually return to my other ‘hobbies’ that are business, economics, technolgy, and war. And for some reason, I’m interested in the changes in the business world I’ve seen over the past ten years, or maybe just since 2016. And I’ve realized it’s the incusion of GenZ into the already weak half of the Milennial cohort. And lets say I’m as afraid of what I see there, as much as I’m afraid of dating, marriage, and reproduction rates, immigration rates, the marxist-to-woke march through the institutions, and the restoration of american, or at least anglosphere, isolationism.

    Talking with a friend who I respect yesterday, and I’m kind of awed at times by what respectably educated and sophisticated people do not comprend about the hard work of running businesses at scale. Meaning outside the SMB market.

    Conversely, at the top of the market with public companies you have such a luxury of available capital and financing that private companies don’t – even if it comes at the cost of regulatory burden, board burden, and shareholder burden – none of which convey the value they purport to any more than an insurance company and an auditor. I mean, some of the largest public companies are really just financial firms managing their investments and distribution channels.

    So while small businesses may be hard to start (usually I get to 5m the first year), the hard part of running a business begins as soon as you exit the SMB market and enter the middle market, because if your company is exceptional, profitable, and growing, you are always constrained by a shortage of nothing more than float, developing operational excellence, and building a managment team that lets you focus on the next three years, rather than the present one.

    We have been in an era of extraordinary capital avilability. The first money I was a part of raising was 5M in the early 80s. But the time we hit the 90s it was trivial. And even after 2008, at least in my sectors (technology) it’s been a frat party.

    But that capital was made possible by the boomer generation coinciding with (a) the postwar advantage of the USA as the only remaining industrial civilization, (b) the reagan era economics of defeating the soviets (c) the windfall from the 30 year tech boom (my lifetime), (d) and the integration of foreign markets, (e) the absurd tolerance for accumulating debt especially consumer debt, (f) altogether allowing the boomers to stick money into every crack and crevice of opportunity in the economy, and then some.

    But (a) the boomers are gone, they are now living on those investments, they will not be adding but subracting from capital and expecting hard returns on it (b) present generations have burned the debt of their first home ownership on education that has not and will not produce previous generations of returns. (c) The USA will remain for all predictiable futures, and the dollar will remain, the haven for foreign investment – simply because we’re just the least bad of the major currencies, and have the most stable rule of law – but that investment will be conservative (d) the cheap cost of good created by the American postwar order (and previous british order), that was intended to create federations of peaceful people, isn’t survivalbe with the return of agrarian empires that federalism was designed to replace, in China (if the CCP survives), Iran_vs_Turkey-MENA, Russia (if she survives), and the many south american countries that have a long way to go before they exit the corruption of socialist countries, even if they ever can evolve into advanced rule-of-law economies.

    So, I see naivety in the population, ignorance in the population, demographic decline in aggregate IQ forcing us into second world norms traditions values and institutions. I see a broken governmen torn between a failing postwar ambition and the left’s postwar neo-marxist ambitions including the replacement of the founding population, their institutions, history, traditions, values, norms, habits, and metaphysical presumptions.

    And I don’t see any way out of it other than the traditional one all civilizations rely upon: the use of the military industrial complex to restore incentives, education, capital organization, and discipline that washes away the old economy and forces a new one.

    Now there are alternatives. But that’s the most likely one that I can see – despite the military-state-intel complex’s rather competent understanding of the world context, in competition with a set of leftist institutions of that same postwar era assuming institutional capture is within reach at precisely the time the capital theyw anted to redistribution and control is evaporating like a shallow puddle on the DC airport tarmac in July.

    We do not have the human capital to do other than suffer the next decade without a re-concentration of human capital away from rent seeking (financialism, government, academy, media, entertainment) into human capital, institutional capital, behavioral capital, and assets that can compensate for the set of declines. Declines made possible because libertarians and conservaties are too full of christian forgivness and foolish optimism as well as ‘leave me alone’ to have stopped it.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 18:40:48 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661439242625581062

  • As an angel investor and lender, I only put money behind what I considered sure

    As an angel investor and lender, I only put money behind what I considered sure things. Only larger firms can put money into speculatives where only one in ten or twenty survive. I can still help ‘friends’ with pitches but otherwise there is something very wrong with the comprenension of the world in Gen Z that historically is only corrected with pain. And that pain is coming fast. About on schedule.


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-24 17:53:54 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1661430336423690251

  • THE JEWISH STEREOTYPE OF HARD WORK IS LARGELY TRUE, BUT COMES WITH A CAVEAT… 1

    THE JEWISH STEREOTYPE OF HARD WORK IS LARGELY TRUE, BUT COMES WITH A CAVEAT…

    1) Women can work harder on clerical work than men. Men can work harder of physical work than women.

    2) Jewish verbal and clerical capacity has been selectd for since at least the Egyptian selectionโ€ฆ


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 17:55:39 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660705998015700999

    Reply addressees: @DwightExMachina

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660699559729741826

  • THE JEWISH STEREOTYPE OF HARD WORK IS LARGELY TRUE, BUT COMES WITH A CAVEAT… 1

    THE JEWISH STEREOTYPE OF HARD WORK IS LARGELY TRUE, BUT COMES WITH A CAVEAT…

    1) Women can work harder on clerical work than men. Men can work harder of physical work than women.

    2) Jewish verbal and clerical capacity has been selectd for since at least the Egyptian selection of jews as their local servants because they were outcasts from the other tribes of the region.

    3) Ashenazi IQ appears a result of male jewish inbreeding with italian women, then restoration of separatism, and the aggressive selection and outcasting, combined with bottlenecks that favored Rabbis with large families.

    4) Ashkenazi intelligence and cculture appers to mirror female intelligence and culture.

    5) HOWEVER

    (a) Ashkenazi jews still specialize in asymmetric industries that favor verbalism, attention seeking, baiting into hazard, evasion of warranty and liabilty, hiding behind plausiable deniability, rent seeking, especially in credentialism, then nepotism, and organized undermining responsibility for the commons, and organize wearfare and lawfare against the host populations – and they still avoid productive industries that favor reciprocity. (I’m not the only person who has done the reserach on this subject.)

    (b) If we look at the Hasidim they are effectively parasites both here and in Israel and evade all responsibility for the commons – especially defense.

    (c) in summary the ashkeanzim and the europeans both started with the institutional premise of law, which created a demand for proper intellectuals. The difference is that jewish people sought the female parasitic strategy among hosts so that they could avoid responsibility for commons,m and europeans sought the male productive strategy of collective sovereignty, by the mass production of commons, by the maximization of individual soverignty.

    (d) There is a reason these ‘hostiles’ sold christianity to women in the ancient world, and neo-marxistm, feminism, pc, and woke to women in the modern world.

    So, you can blame a human or an animal or even a bug for doing what’s in it’s nature. Or you can assume things have a nature, and defend against it. We have failed to defend against the feminine means of warfare, treason, sedition parasitism, and criminality, for reasons I”ve explained elsewhere.

    As such all that remains is equally outlawing female parasitic behavior as we have male predatory behavior.

    We’re the people that create responsibility. We must continue to. Or fail AGAIN as we did in Rome because of our ‘tolerance’: optimistic thinking that others are as equally virtuous despte the overwhelming evidence.

    This is just a matter of taking responsiblity for expanading our law to prohibit parasitism, rent seeking, and baiting into hazard.

    I’ve done – my organization has done – the work

    Y’all just have to ‘show up’. ๐Ÿ˜‰

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-22 17:55:38 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1660705997764042770

  • The economic question is whether savers have a right to appreciation of currency

    The economic question is whether savers have a right to appreciation of currency at expense of those not yet able to save. The answer has been ‘no’ because it’s self defeating. Conversely do savers have a right to preservation of purchasing power. The answer has been ‘no’ because there are other assets to invest in. And finally, those who construct long term agreements (contracts) have a right to stable purchasing power. The answer has been no, and they can accomodate for it. Of these reasons only the last has meaningful economic merit. The stability of purchasing power must not interfere with the production cycle.

    Reply addressees: @tryanph


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-18 11:50:33 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659164567388184576

    Replying to: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1659125678862729216

  • WHY ARE RETAILERS CLOSING? Is it cyclical (a little)? Is it technological (a lit

    WHY ARE RETAILERS CLOSING?
    Is it cyclical (a little)? Is it technological (a little)? Is it geoeconomic (a little)? But what is it mostly? Well, that’s simple:

    1. Decapitalization of human knowledge by failure of education by capture of education by hostiles to individual responsibility, competition, and tolerance for adversity and need for adaptabiilty.
    2. Decapitalization of Individual productivity by unnecessary education costs for entry into the jobmarket.
    3. Decapitalization of marriage capital by decline in dating, mating, marriage
    4. Decapitalization of physical human capital by decline in reproduction
    5. Decapitalization of family capital and decline in per household income in the family and increase in single parenting.
    6. Decapitalization of potential for human capital by urbanization and density under which all productivity increases from density are captured by housing and taxation costs.
    7. Decapitalization of economic potential by asymmetric reproduction and immigration causing US IQ to drop to second world levels.
    8. Resulting decapitalization of strategic advantage, reducing US incomes to those of europe, and europe to those of eastern europe.

    The purpose of existence is reproduction not self satisfaction, and without reproduction we cannot have self satisfaction., People that do not produce replacement level reproduction or more, are a dead weight that consumes human, social, economic, institutional, and strategic capital.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-18 00:32:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658993924306812928

  • WHY ARE RETAILERS CLOSING? Is it cyclical (a little). Is it technological (a lit

    WHY ARE RETAILERS CLOSING?
    Is it cyclical (a little). Is it technological (a little), is it geoeconomic (a little). But what is it mostly? Well, that’s simple:

    1. Decapitalization of human knowledge by failure of education by capture of education by hostiles to individual responsibility, competition, and tolerance for adversity and need for adaptabiilty.
    2. Decapitalization of Individual productivity by unnecessary education costs for entry into the jobmarket.
    3. Decapitalization of marriage capital by decline in dating, mating, marriage
    4. Decapitalization of physical human capital by decline in reproduction
    5. Decapitalization of family capital and decline in per household income in the family and increase in single parenting.
    6. Decapitalization of potential for human capital by urbanization and density under which all productivity increases from density are captured by housing and taxation costs.
    7. Decapitalization of economic potential by asymmetric reproduction and immigration causing US IQ to drop to second world levels.
    8. Resulting decapitalization of strategic advantage, reducing US incomes to those of europe, and europe to those of eastern europe.

    The purpose of existence is reproduction not self satisfaction, and without reproduction we cannot have self satisfaction., People that do not produce replacement level reproduction or more, are a dead weight that consumes human, social, economic, institutional, and strategic capital.

    Cheers
    Curt Doolittle
    The Natural Law Institute


    Source date (UTC): 2023-05-18 00:32:28 UTC

    Original post: https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1658992867753308168